My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 4740
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2002 No. 4697-4745
>
Resolution No. 4740
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:48:24 PM
Creation date
7/13/2006 1:16:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
9/23/2002
Document_Number
4740
CMO_Effective_Date
9/23/2002
Repeal_Date
5/7/2007
Author
Kathleen A. Fieland
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />}> Street Light Costs <br /> <br />}> Bridge and Other Structure Construction Costs <br /> <br />Cost basis assumptions and related factors are listed in Table 4. Specific <br />system valuation calculations for these cost components are reflected in <br />Table 5. Because new development trips will be served by a combination <br />of existing and new facilities, and because the costs of new and existing <br />facilities vary according to prevailing design standards and policies, the <br />average cost per lane mile is calculated based on a weighted average of <br />existing and projected new lane mile costs. The weighting between the <br />existing system average cost and the new system cost is based on new <br />development's projected utilization of existing system capacity versus new <br />capacity-oriented improvements. <br /> <br />This weighted average cost basis approach also supports the development of <br />separate Reimbursement and Improvement SDCs. Oregon SDC law allows local <br />governments to charge an improvement SDC, a reimbursement SDC, or a <br />combination of the two. The Improvement fee is intended to recover the costs of <br />future capacity improvements needed to serve new development, while the <br />Reimbursement fee relates to the costs of existing facilities that provide capacity <br />for growth. <br /> <br />In determining the appropriate weighting of the existing system and future <br />system costs to be used in the development of the cost basis, projected vehicle <br />trips generated by growth were modeled and separated into 2 categories: <br /> <br />Trips that conduct their travel entirely on the existina Eugene arterial and <br />collector network (existing system); and <br /> <br />Trips that rely on projected SDC-funded future improvement during their <br />travel on the Eugene arterial and collector network (future system). <br /> <br />Modeling and analysis of the future trips using this approach results in a split of <br />40 percent existing system trips and 60 percent future system trips. These <br />percentages are applied to the average costs per lane mile of the existing and <br />future systems respectively to determine the weighted average cost per lane mile <br />of the street system (see Table 5). <br /> <br />The formula for developing the street component cost basis is as follows: <br /> <br />SDC Cost Basis = <br /> <br />Avg. Cost Per Lane Mile (existing system) X Capacity % (existing system) + <br /> <br />Avg. Cost per Lane Mile (future system) X Capacity % (future system) <br /> <br />Table 5 details the calculation of the average cost per lane mile by component <br />for the existing and future systems. The development of separate costs for <br />existing and new capacity allows for changes in building standards, system <br />configuration, assessable construction costs, and other assumptions between <br /> <br />City of Eugene sDC Methodology <br /> <br />Transportation, Page B- 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.