Laserfiche WebLink
<br />HUMAN RIGHTS PROGRAM <br />FY 2006 ACTIVITIES AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS <br /> <br />WORKING COOPERATIVELY WITH THE POLICE DEPARTMENT <br /> <br />contracting for professional mediation services and providing <br />compensation for those services to elevate perceptions that <br />the process is credible, neutral and safe; <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Human Rights Commission members and staff continue to <br />work with the Eugene Police Department (EPD) to aid the <br />department in its efforts to work with the community <br /> <br />proposing that case assignment, coordination, and program <br />evaluation occur through the Auditor's Office; and <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />recognizing that getting both parties to agree to mediation is <br />often a challenge, MATT recommended several incentives for <br />participation to incorporate into program design <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MATT also discussed the role of advocacy in the new complaint <br />process and developed several recommendations for how addi- <br />tional, outside support could be provided to complainants. Most <br />significantly, MATT emphasized that the Human Rights Program <br />will have a critical role in educating people about the new com- <br />plaint intake and review process and assuring them that their <br />concerns will be treated fairly and with due diligence. Future con- <br />versations between the Auditor's Office and the Human Rights <br />Program were encouraged to ensure a collaborative working rela- <br />tionship and to create mutually acceptable protocols for how ad- <br />vocates can assist in the new system. <br /> <br />Mediation and Advocacy Task Team (MATT): The <br />task team, consisting of members of both the Police and <br />Human Rights commissions and mediation practitioners, <br />was charged with evaluating the City's existing mediation <br />program and reviewing other programs in place nationally, <br />using this information to develop recommendations to opti- <br />mize the use of alternative methods of resolving com- <br />plaints against police employees, and developing a report <br />to both the Police and Human Rights commissions which, <br />if accepted, could be forwarded to the Police Auditor as a <br />framework for future program redesign <br /> <br />Some key recommendations included: <br />. retaining both mediation and facilitated conversations <br />as voluntary alternative complaint resolution options <br />and clarifying the distinction between the two proc- <br />esses; <br /> <br />Cooperation with EPD Internal Affairs staff: Human Rights <br />Program members continued to work with EPD staff on police- <br />related Human Rights Support System cases <br /> <br />establishing broader case eligibility standards so that <br />with the exception of a few categorical exclusions, com- <br />plaints would be reviewed on a case-by-case basis to <br />determine where mediation would offer the best chance <br />of a satisfactory resolution for both parties; <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Page 18 <br /> <br />FY 2007/2008 Work Plan <br /> <br />FY 2006 Annual Report and <br /> <br />Eugene Human Rights Commission <br />