My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B - MWMC Agreement
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 04/11/05 WS
>
Item B - MWMC Agreement
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:11:31 PM
Creation date
4/7/2005 8:32:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/11/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
· Incorporate the regional wastewater 2004 Facilities Plan as the basis for planning and improving <br /> facilities, and specify that updates that will be submitted for review and approval by the governing <br /> bodies. <br />· Delete the user charge reference to federal regulations (40 CFR 35.929), because previous federal <br /> restrictions under the grants no longer apply, and replace it with language ensuring that sufficient <br /> user charges will be established to meet debt service requirements in addition to operations, <br /> maintenance, etc. <br />· Strengthen language about collection and remittance of revenues, in response to Financial Advisor <br /> concerns and the need to satisfy bond rating agencies. <br />· Remove 30-day notice of termination; leave one-year notice requirement; and further restrict Eugene <br /> and Springfield from terminating when there is outstanding debt requiring long-term commitment of <br /> revenues, unless a provision is made for debt repayment. <br />· Modify the dispute resolution process to provide that, after the Metropolitan Policy Committee <br /> makes its recommendation, the commission's action takes effect only after all the governing bodies <br /> agree, except that the objecting governing body's recourse is limited to submitting the matter to the <br /> commission for reconsideration when: 1) the objection is to the commission's adoption of sewer user <br /> charges and "such charges are needed to pay the expenses of the operation, maintenance, <br /> rehabilitation and capital improvements for the regional sewerage facilities and to meet the principal, <br /> interest, coverage requirements of all notes, bonds or other evidence of indebtedness issued by the <br /> commission;" and 2) the objection is to the "commission's adoption of systems development charges <br /> to provide funding for the commission' s CIP and associated eligible expenses consistent with state <br /> law." Note that the current IGA contains a comparable clause that committed the governing bodies <br /> to adopt rates and connection charges that were sufficient to comply with the wastewater grant <br /> requirements of the CFR. <br /> <br />Changes also are proposed to Appendix A of the intergovernmental agreement to reflect a revised <br />definition of"regional" wastewater facility. This revision shifts the current definition from an arbitrary <br />pipe size, to a consistently applied concept of"shared flows." The new language establishes a logical <br />ownership pattern whereby components of the overall wastewater collection and conveyance system that <br />serve only Eugene or Springfield are owned and maintained by the appropriate agency. Components <br />that transport or treat wastewater from both Eugene and Springfield are defined as part of the regional <br />MWMC system. This revision reflects the actual practices used by the cities' local sewer programs and <br />the Regional Wastewater Program for many years. <br /> <br />The City Council of Springfield held a work session on the proposed amendments to the IGA on March <br />21, 2005. The council approved continuance of the process and an additional meeting, scheduled for <br />April 18, 2005, for the first reading and public hearing on the ordinance related to the proposed <br />amendments to the IGA and the related issuance of the revenue bonds. Final action is scheduled for <br />May 2, 2005. <br /> <br />The Lane County Finance and Audit Committee discussed the proposed amendments to the IGA on <br />March 15, 2005. This committee is comprised of Commissioners Anna Morrison and Bill Dwyer, and <br />Jim Gangle, the County Tax Assessor. The County Administrator, who staffs the committee, was not <br />present for the meeting. Lane County legal counsel presented the general concepts of the proposed <br />amendments to the IGA, without a specific recommendation. A number of questions and concerns were <br />raised, but not resolved, pending further information and input from the County Administrator. A <br />follow-up meeting of the Finance and Audit Committee is planned for the week of April 11; however, <br />no meetings have been scheduled for the full Board of Commissioners on this topic. <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2005 Council Agendas\M050411\S050411B.doc <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.