Laserfiche WebLink
FNA East Campus Committee Comments <br /> East Campus Lands Land Use Applications Amendments (MA 03-7, RA 03-5, CA 03-5) <br /> February 23, 2004 <br /> <br />Investment in Traffic Calming Saves Money: <br />Allocation of funds for Waffle calming in response to increased density actually saves money by: <br />1) Stabilizing property tax revenues: traffic calming mitigates helps prevent the deterioration of <br /> residential neighborhoods. This, in mm, maintains property values and property tax revenues <br /> for the city. <br />2) Avoided capital and maintenance costs associated with sprawl: In a growing city like <br /> Eugene, the alternative to densification is sprawl. Sprawl reiults in increased capital funding <br /> to expand the transportation system and associated long-term maintenance costs. Eugene's <br /> low System Development Charges result in new development not adequately contributing <br /> toward capital expenses associated with increasing size of the transportation system. <br />3) Increased Efficiency of city services: Traffic calming promotes livability. Livability attracts <br /> residents. More residents mean more property tax revenue per acre and more efficient use of <br /> city services such as fire and police protection. <br /> <br />Traffic Mitigation is Pro-Development: <br />Numerous MetroPlan policies address the importance of mitigating the impact of increased <br />density and preserving existing neighborhoods. Without traffic mitigation the city cannot <br />promote development and in-fill without conflicting with MetroPlan policies. Therefore, traffic <br />mitigation goes hand-in-hand with enhancing Eugene's "open for business" outlook to support <br />commercial activity, create jobs, and improve the community as a whole. <br /> <br />Traffic Mitigation is Needed for the Fairmount Neighborhood: <br />While traffic mitigation is a city-wide issue, the Fairmount Neighborhood specifically needs <br />traffic mitigation due to its close proximity to the University of Oregon. The University of <br />Oregon generates a substantial mount of vehicular and pedestrian that which places a strain in <br />surrounding infrastructure. Like the neighborhood near the Lane County Fairgrounds, traffic <br />mitigation is needed near large institutions. <br /> <br />The University is a Blessing and a Burden: <br />The City of Fairmount (now the Fairmount Neighborhood) was formed when the University held <br />a few acres near Agate street. As the University has grown, the single-family neighborhood has <br />embraced the cultural offerings the University provides while dealing with the burden of <br />increased traffic and development. The University is an economic powerhouse and stimulates <br />other aspects of Eugene's economy. However, unlike other residents, the University does not <br />pay property taxes or pay for fire coverage which provide for the long term preservation and <br />maintenance of the City's infrastructure and services. As the City embraces all the University <br />has to offer, so to must the City step in and promote a long-term, harmonious relationship <br />between the University and the Neighborhood through infxastmcmre improvements that promote <br />University development while protecting the single-family neighborhood. <br /> <br />Traffic Policies: <br />Because of the importance of traffic mitigation, the FNA East Campus Committee proposes <br />changes to traffic policies #6 and #7. Traffic policy #6 deals with addressing Agate Street which <br />is characterized as "nearly dysfunctional" by city staff. In particular, the intersection of Franklin <br />Boulevard and Agate Street is approaching failure according to state criteria. Traffic policy #7 <br />deals with an area-wide traffic analysis on or before December 2008. These policies have <br />consistently been of concern to the Committee and all parties involved in the process have been <br /> <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> City Council Agenda page 258 <br /> <br /> <br />