Laserfiche WebLink
University of Oregon East Campus Lands Land Use Applications <br /> February 23, 2004 City Council Public Hearing <br /> Public Testimony #5 <br /> <br />Submitted by: <br /> Terri Harding, Satre Assodates <br /> 132 East BrOadway, Suite 536 <br /> <br /> Carefully Thought Out PropOsal; Restricted to University-owned ! Ands <br /> <br /> The proposal before you was submitted by the U of O and is purposefully <br /> restricted to lands within the approved campus boundary. However, because this <br /> process is legislative rather than quasi-judicial, we don't have a lot of time to <br /> present the proposals to you. With that in mind, I encourage you to review the <br /> Planning Commission record for a full history of the evolution of the proposal. <br /> There is a carefully thought out reason for every.proposal in the applications, and <br /> as the staff report points out, many of the proposals are the result of compromises <br /> reached during the mediation process. <br /> <br />The Fairmount Neighbors Association (FNA) and the University of Oregon are in <br />agreement on all of the major aspects of these land-use applications. We agree on <br />.the proposed land use designation maps. That is significant. We agree on the <br />three main policy changes to the Fah=mount/U of O Special Area Study. That is <br />very significant. And we agree that, while outside the scope of these applications, <br />it would be beneficial for the city to fund transportation studies in the Fairmount <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br /> Conditional Uses in the R-1 Buffer <br /> <br /> It is important that the Council understand the university's position on <br /> conditional uses in the low-density residential area. This buffer was established as <br /> a compromise in response to the neighborhood's early concerns over <br /> intensification of use on university lands. Rather than allowing institutional use <br /> all the way to the campus boundary along Villard, a gradual transition was <br /> established within the university boundary. Elsewhere around campus, land uses <br /> transition from institutional on-campus to commercial or high-density residential <br /> off campus. <br /> <br /> During the 18-month process to establish an updated university policy, it was <br /> decided that a low-density buffer could be accommodated on university lands.. <br /> However, the university must retain the ability to apply for a restricted number of <br /> a limited type of conditional use permits; only 5 university office and similar <br /> support function uses could potentially be applied for along Villard Street, and <br /> these uses would have to comply with additional compatibility policies. The <br /> proposal requires preservation of the existing residential character even if a <br /> conditional use is requested. The factors of compatibility to be considered include <br /> building mass, building scale, historic architectural style, setbacks, building and <br /> <br /> City council Agenda page 265 <br /> <br /> <br />