Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Bettman commented that the Mayor often said he wished a broader range of people would testify at <br />public hearings. She asserted the CIC, when it was adequately funded, had the ability to bring more <br />citizens to speak to issues. She added that the CIC had been integral in the creation of the voter pool. She <br />felt feedback from the public had deteriorated without it and declared she would not be voting for the <br />ordinance. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Kelly, Mr. Taylor said the new advisory group of key employees with <br />public involvement experience had yet to be named, but the talent had been identified. He stated that he <br />would provide the list of who would be on this committee via e-mail to Mr. Kelly. <br /> <br /> Mayor Torrey called for the vote. The motion passed, 5:3; Ms. Taylor, Ms. <br /> Bettman, Mr. Kelly voting no. <br /> <br />C. ACTION: Roosevelt Yard Property Acquisition <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Poling, moved to authorize the City Manager to <br /> move forward with the purchase of the property as soon as possible using the <br /> financing plan described in the Agenda Item Summary and to include the inter-fund <br /> loan and other necessary appropriation changes for the purchase in the next <br /> supplemental budget. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner said he would support the ;;discreet motion" before the council, but felt the master plan <br />should have been brought before the council and not just passed administratively. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner conveyed his satisfaction with the response to his concerns regarding liability. He stressed <br />that the City was self-insured and should be vigilant in monitoring activity in the area of the proposed <br />purchase. Additionally, Mr. Meisner noted the property would remain on property tax roles so long as it <br />was leased to tenants. He recommended that it remain leased out until the City was ready to prepare the <br />property for Public Works uses. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly opposed the motion. He suggested potential efficiencies in Public Works that could come about <br />due to partnerships with the County could dramatically change the master plan and the need for the land. <br />He added that the interfund loan would take from the Road Capital Fund and the Stormwater Fund, which <br />were both in need of funding. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap6 remarked that the council should have been %rought into the loop earlier" due to the amount of <br />money involved. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Pap6, Mr. Taylor assured him that the approval of the financing plan <br />and the adoption of the supplemental budget would guarantee the way the interfund loans would be made <br />and that they would be repaid from the $160,000 in annualized revenues. He stressed this was one-time <br />money used as an investment to complete the land assemblage for the Roosevelt Master Plan. Mr. Pap6 <br />said he would support the motion because, should the property prove to be unneeded, it could be turned <br />over at a profit. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling agreed that staff should have brought the council into this property purchase earlier. He echoed <br />Mr. Meisner's comment that the property should remain rented until the City was ;;ready to turn dirt." <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 11, 2004 Page 6 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />