My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCAgenda-3/08/04Mtg
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-03/08/04Mtg
>
CCAgenda-3/08/04Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:12:46 PM
Creation date
3/5/2004 11:50:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/8/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Poling felt the County was not likely to share the property as it seemed to be moving out more toward <br />the periphery of the City. He supported the motion. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asserted the property was contaminated. She felt she could not support the financing or the <br />acquisition. She remarked that this was a demonstration of fiscal discipline and that, as the purchase was <br />not a city-wide priority, she would do as staff often urged the council to do and exercise this discipline. <br />She repeated her concern regarding the size of the property and her assertion that data projecting a staff <br />increase of 40 people was erroneous. <br /> <br />Ms. Solomon informed the council that an environmental report had been published on the site and it was <br />determined to be clean. Mr. Taylor corroborated this. <br /> <br />Ms. Solomon supported the motion. She opined the City should not own too much property, however. <br />She asked how much property the City currently owned and if excess property was being sold. <br /> <br />Mr. Carlson responded, stating the City had been successful in selling such properties, having recently sold <br />three fire stations, the parking lot across from the library, and a large portion of City-owned land in the <br />Danebo area. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor called it "misplaced priorities and land speculation." She opined there was too much money at <br />stake and continued rent income was not a certainty. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner reiterated that he regarded it as an investment. He expected the City to make the property a <br />revenue-producer. He concurred with Ms. Bettman that it was more land than needed and suggested the <br />City sell a portion of it. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson said it was an investment and "an important way of avoiding potential cost in the future." <br /> <br /> Mayor Torrey called for the vote. The motion passed, 5:3 (Mr. Kelly, Ms. Bettman, <br /> and Ms. Taylor voting in opposition). <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey adjourned the meeting at 1:20 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />Dennis M. Taylor <br />City Manager <br /> <br />(Recorded by Ruth Atcherson) <br />M: 120041Central Services DepartmentlCity Councillcc04021 lml. wpd <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 11, 2004 Page 7 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.