My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3A - Minutes Approval
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 04/11/05 Mtg
>
Item 3A - Minutes Approval
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:07:31 PM
Creation date
4/7/2005 8:39:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/11/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Pomes provided an overview of the ordinance. She stated that the County board had approved a <br /> rabies vaccination reporting requirement and the ordinance under consideration would provide for <br /> enforcement of this requirement within the city limits of the City of Eugene. She said data would be used <br /> to increase dog licensing compliance and dog licensing revenue. <br /> <br /> Councilor Poling opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Deanna Diehl, 1343 Taft Street, volunteer with the Lane County Animal Regulation Authority (LCARA), <br />called the ordinance a good idea. She worked at the animal shelter and had attended several of the task <br />force meetings. She felt the task force had worked hard to come up with its report and recommendation. <br />She supported the ordinance because it increased the LCARA revenue and the ability to collect it. She <br />likened it to a user fee for parks. She felt a dog license was like an insurance policy that made sure a lost <br />dog would be returned. Additionally, she expressed appreciation for the cattery. She shared a story of the <br />rescue of a dying cat that was euthanized at the shelter rather than left to die on the street. She also <br />wished to commend Barbara and Kylie for their work at the shelter. <br /> <br />Cynthia Sinclair, 6825 F Street, Springfield, said she was a judge who heard dog bite cases in the Central <br />Lane Justice Court. She was very aware of the pain and fear that goes on in a dog bite case. Presently, <br />she explained, it was not possible to know for certain whether a dog had been vaccinated for rabies unless <br />one'called every veterinarian in the County. She stated that, with the ordinance, not only would this data <br />be available, it would contribute revenue to animal control, possibly freeing up some of the current <br />funding for other areas of the City that were in need. She also felt that some funding could be funneled <br />into the Low-Cost Spay/Neuter Clinic as well as into increasing kennel capacity so that dogs would not be <br />euthanized simply to make room for more dogs. She related that she had served on the task force and that <br />the group had worked through its contentiousness toward a result they could all agree upon. <br /> <br />Rita Castillo, 6825 F Street, Springfield, advocated for adoption of the ordinance. She did not want <br />people in Eugene to undergo the terror of not knowing whether a dog bite would cause rabies. She related <br />that the largest objection to the ordinance she had heard in the task force was that it would generate more <br />paper work. She did not think that a little paper work should stand in the way of public safety. She <br />underscored that no jurisdiction that adopted such an ordinance had ever rescinded it. She called adoption <br />of it "the right thing to do," adding that it would save money and lives. <br /> <br />Janetta Overholser, 30300 Cottage Grove-Lorane Road, Cottage Grove, said she had served on the task <br />force. She stated that rabies had been in Lane County, though only rarely. She related that several baby <br />bats had tested positive for it the previous summer. She thought there was a definite possibility that cats <br />and dogs could be bitten and the disease transmitted to them. She stressed that no one would want to wait <br />over a weekend to find out whether a biting animal had been inoculated against rabies. She echoed the <br />concern expressed about animals being euthanized because quarantined animals were taking up valuable <br />kennel space. She noted, too, that dogs do not understand boundaries, so it was important for the City and <br />County to have consistency in this regard. <br /> <br />Roberta Boyden, 1568 Fairmount Boulevard, stated that she had been a veterinarian in Eugene for seven <br />years and had served on the task force. She had worked in veterinary clinics in six states and this was the <br />first state she had been in that did not have such a reporting mechanism for rabies vaccinations. She <br />asserted that the ordinance under consideration was the norm and not the exception. She underscored that <br />the threat of a rabies outbreak should be avoided at all costs. She noted she had lived in Maine during a <br />rabies outbreak. She stated that it was beneficial to the community to know whether animals had been <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 28, 2005 Page 9 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.