Laserfiche WebLink
vaccinated. She said her concerns regarding client confidentiality had been addressed in the County <br />codes. She averred that increasing licensure would help lost dogs be returned to their owners. She hoped <br />the information would not be used to enforce City and County limit laws unless it was shown that the <br />number of animals threatened the health and safety of the animals. <br /> <br />Scott Bartlett, 1445 East 21 st Avenue, asserted that every day, in thousands of communities, veterinarians <br />routinely sent for triplicate copies of rabies vaccine records. He stated that he had been chairman of the <br />task force. He noted that 30,000 dogs and cats had been euthanized over the previous 30 years. He said <br />83 percent of dogs in Lane County were not licensed as there was no systematic way to intersect with <br />them to ensure licensure. He calculated that enactment of this ordinance would bring in approximately <br />$257,000 in additional revenue. He suggested that some of this revenue be channeled into subsidies for <br />the spaying and neutering of animals belonging to people with low incomes. He explained that the bottom <br />tier of society was responsible for 60 percent of all euthanasia and impounds. He said while this issue did <br />not have the political power or "sex appeal" that some issues did, it was still very important to take action <br />to reduce animal euthanasia. <br /> <br />Jack Dresser, 38131 McKenzie Highway, Springfield, scientist for the Oregon Research Institute, said <br />there were 24 percent more pets in Lane County than there were households. He stated that humans had <br />invited these animals to share their lives for 14,000 years and were obligated to take care of them. He <br />related that his daughter had been attacked by dogs and it had been extremely beneficial to have <br />immediate access to the dogs' veterinary records. He echoed the recommendation that some of the <br />additional revenue generated by this ordinance should be used to subsidize spay and neuter services. He <br />thought people would be more willing to pay the fees if they thought they were going for the benefit of <br />animals and not just into the General Fund. He suggested that licenses be made more accessible, perhaps <br />sold at convenience stores. <br /> <br />Mary Ann Itolser, 2620 Cresta de Ruta Drive, called owning a pet a privilege and not a civil liberty. She <br />stated that a pet owner had a responsibility to keep that pet healthy and happy. She said one had a <br />community responsibility as well to prevent the spread of disease from one's pet to other animals and <br />people and that the government had a responsibility to protect the public health. She related that she had <br />witnessed a rabies outbreak in New York State in which there were many infected raccoons, some of <br />which had bitten dogs. She noted that Canada had complained because some of the rabid raccoons had <br />crossed the border. <br /> <br /> Tom Itolser, 2620 Cresta de Ruta Drive, related that he had recently visited an emergency room while in <br /> Los Angeles, California, because of a dog bite. He said California had strict laws about such reporting <br /> and it was determined immediately that the dog in question had not been vaccinated. He was forced to be <br /> vaccinated for rabies, a very unpleasant experience, but was pleased by how proactive the authorities were <br /> there. He expressed amazement that Lane County had an 80 percent failure rate for its licensing. <br /> <br /> Robert Itermann, 635 West 25th Avenue, supported the ordinance. He called it a "no-brainer" that the <br /> City would want to have accurate reporting. He noted that he and his wife, though not of great means, had <br /> a dog and licensed it as required by law. He was irked to hear that the majority of residents in Lane <br /> County did not do so. He related that he had produced several public service announcements for LCARA <br /> and had seen the pile of dead dogs and cats after routine euthanizations. He felt many of them could have <br /> been someone's pets. He said the ordinance would be a great first step in reuniting animals with their <br /> owners. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 28, 2005 Page 10 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />