My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Alternative Mobility Standards
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 10/23/06 Work Session
>
Item B: Alternative Mobility Standards
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:11:48 PM
Creation date
10/19/2006 10:11:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/23/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Attachment A - Corridor Congestion Summary <br /> <br />McVay Hiahway <br /> <br />This roadway carries a minor percentage of the mobility dependent trips of the TMA. <br />The OHP mobility standard for this highway is 0.9. <br /> <br />2002: <br />This corridor is composed of only one sub-corridor in each direction. Both of the sub- <br />corridors meet the standard based on the peak period VMT weighted average V/C <br />within each sub-corridor and have no segments exceeding the standard. <br /> <br />2025: <br />In the RTP- Financially Constrained scenario, each direction is within the existing <br />standard, though there are segments of each sub-corridor that exceed the standard. In <br />particular, these segments are at this corridor's junction with Franklin Avenue, and on <br />the southbound 1-5 to 30th Ave segment in the AM, and on the southbound Franklin to 1- <br />5 section in the PM. <br /> <br />The table below summarizes the V/C results for the AM and PM periods of the 2025 <br />RTP- Financially Constrained scenario, noting where the sub-corridor meets the <br />performance standard (~) and also where a segment within that passing corridor may fail <br />(*) . <br /> <br />Sub-corridor <br /> <br />AM <br /> <br /> <br />Northbound <br />Southbound <br /> <br />~ <br />~ (*) <br /> <br />Sprinafield-Creswell Hiahway <br /> <br />This roadway carries a very minor percentage of the mobility dependent trips of the <br />TMA. The OHP mobility standard for this highway is 0.9. <br /> <br />2002: <br />All of the sub-corridors meet the standard based on the peak period VMT weighted <br />average V/C within each sub-corridor. No segments fail the standard. <br /> <br />2025: <br />In the RTP- Financially Constrained scenario, all the sub-corridors continue to meet the <br />existing standards. There are no segments of sub-corridors that do not meet the <br />existing standard. <br /> <br />Page 13 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.