My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Proposed Modifications to the Parks Systems Development Charge Methodology and Rates
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 10/25/06 Work Session
>
Item B: Proposed Modifications to the Parks Systems Development Charge Methodology and Rates
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:15:47 PM
Creation date
10/19/2006 10:45:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/25/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />growth costs by the growth in resident population and hotel/motel guests. As presented in <br />Table 2, the projected number of new guests in tourist accommodation rooms is estimated to be <br />979 through the study period. Therefore the system-wide unit cost is calculated as follows: <br />Total Growth cost /Resident Population Growth + New Hotel/Motel Guests <br />$57.8 million /(43,442 + 979)= $1,290 per person <br />The SDC per unit is the product of the persons per unit and the system-wide unit cost of $1,290 <br />per person. Table 4 provides information on the average persons per unit for residential and <br />tourist accommodation development, along with the resulting SDCs . <br />Table 4 also presents the projected revenue recovery by class. As the table indicates, SDCs per <br />unit range from $2,154 for multifamily to $3,406 for single-family dwellings. Under this <br />approach, 2.2 percent of total revenue would be recovered from nonresidential (tourist <br />accommodation) development. <br /> <br />Table 4 <br />Preliminary SDC Schedule and Estimated Revenue Generation – Tourist Accommodation Dev. Only <br />Equiv. <br />Persons Dwelling Projected Projected <br />Categoryper UnitSDC per UnitUnits/ UnitUnitsRevenue <br />per Dwelling UnitDwelling Units <br />Single-family 2.64$3,406 1.0010,548$35,921,292 <br />Duplex/TH/MH 2.14$2,761 0.813,063$8,456,107 <br />Multifamily 1.67$2,154 0.635,633$12,136,239 <br />Tourist Accommodation <br />per RoomRooms <br />(Nonresidential cat. A) 1.93$2,490 0.73507$1,262,278 <br />Total Revenue$57,775,916 <br /> <br />Sample SDCs <br />Table 5 presents SDCs under the two methods described above for sample developments <br />(consistent with sample developments used in the City’s SDC survey of Oregon communities) <br />and for a methodology which would assess only residential development. These sample SDCs <br />represent estimated SDCs to illustrate the potential relative differences of the SDCs for various <br />development types. <br />As shown in Table 5, the SDC for residential development (single-family and apartments) is <br />highest in the approach and lowest in the approach – which <br />no nonresidentialall nonresidential <br />has the largest equivalent population across which growth costs are shared. The hotel/motel <br />SDC is lower in the approach. As the table indicates, in the <br />all nonresidentialall nonresidential <br />approach, SDCs would range from a low of $2,693 for a lower turnover restaurant, to a high of <br />$191,395 for a 104 unit apartment building – among the development types presented. <br /> <br />Table 5 <br />Calculations of SDCs for Sample Developments <br />Type of Development Units No Hotel/Motel All <br />Nonresidential Only Nonresidential <br />Single - Family Dwelling 1 DU $3,481 $3,406 $2,909 <br />PSDCNOA P810 <br />ARKS ONRESIDENTIAL PTIONS ATTACHMENT AGE OF <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.