Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ATTACHMENT B <br /> <br /> <br />Public Works <br /> <br /> <br />Engineering <br /> <br /> <br />City of Eugene <br />MEMORANDUMMEMORANDUM <br />858 Pearl Street <br />Eugene, Oregon 97401 <br />(541) 682-5291 <br />(541) 682-5032 FAX <br />Date: <br />October 19, 2006 <br /> <br />To: <br />Mayor Piercy and City Council <br /> <br />From: <br />Fred McVey, 682-5216 <br /> Engineering Data Services Manager <br /> <br />Subject: <br />Neighborhood Park Growth Allocation Methods <br />This memorandum presents information to the City Council related to methodological options <br />for determination of the growth allocation percentage for the neighborhood parks element of the <br />proposed parks system development charges (SDCs). In particular, two growth allocation <br />methods associated with neighborhood park projects are presented for the Council’s <br />consideration: the first considers allocation of capacity-related project costs based on a system- <br />wide level of service analysis, and the second develops a growth allocation based on analysis of <br />estimated future population served within localized neighborhood park service areas. <br />Background <br />The preliminary SDC methodology as reviewed by the Public Works Rates Advisory Committee <br />(RAC) uses a system-wide capacity analysis as the basis for allocating costs associated with the <br />Parks Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Project and Priorities Plan (project list). Under this <br />1 <br />approach, the planned system-wide level of service (LOS) by park type is used to determine the <br />capacity needs of existing park users and growth. The capacity needs of existing park users are <br />then compared to the existing parks inventory in relation to the planned LOS to determine if <br />there are existing system deficiencies that would warrant an allocation of future park <br />improvements to existing users. <br />Based on the adopted project list, the planned LOS for neighborhood park acquisition is slightly <br />lower than the current LOS, meaning there is no existing deficiency from an overall or system- <br />wide perspective. In this case, 100% of new neighborhood park land acquisition cost in the <br />project list is allocated to future development, since the existing inventory is assumed to satisfy <br />the needs of existing park users. <br />The use of a system-wide capacity analysis for purposes of cost allocation was endorsed by a <br />majority of the RAC for a number of reasons including consistency with the City’s other SDC <br />methodologies (i.e., stormwater, local wastewater, and transportation), technical and <br />administrative feasibility, and equity. However, during City Council and RAC deliberations, the <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> The planned level of service is equal to the planned total future acres divided by the total future population served. <br />B,NPGA P16 <br />ATTACHMENT EIGHBORHOOD ARK ROWTH LLOCATION AGE OF <br /> <br />