Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Summary <br />Several options are available to consider nonresidential development in the parks SDC <br />methodology and rates. Key findings of the review of available options include: <br />Nonresidential parks SDCs are assessed by other communities; however, assessment <br /> <br />? <br />methods often rely on an inferred relationship and indirect measurement of capacity <br />demand. <br />A nexus between nonresidential development and park capacity demand, and a method <br /> <br />? <br />distributing capacity demand between residential and nonresidential, can be established <br />using the results of the City of Eugene parks and recreation facilities’ user survey. <br />Inclusion of a non-residential SDC is a methodological choice which is revenue neutral. <br /> <br />? <br />A nonresidential SDC expands the user base (i.e., equivalent population), across which <br />park capacity costs are divided; it does not increase the system-wide capacity need or <br />costs, nor provide additional SDC revenue. <br />A key challenge in developing a nonresidential SDC is determining assessment methods <br /> <br />? <br />which provide equity amongst various types and sizes of development. <br />These options and findings will be reviewed with City Council to establish policy direction for <br />treatment of nonresidential development in the proposed modification of the parks SDC. <br /> <br />PSDCNOA P1010 <br />ARKS ONRESIDENTIAL PTIONS ATTACHMENT AGE OF <br />