My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 1: PH on Ordinance Amending Metro Plan (Delta Sand and Gravel)
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 11/01/06 JEO Meeting
>
Item 1: PH on Ordinance Amending Metro Plan (Delta Sand and Gravel)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:18:50 PM
Creation date
10/26/2006 8:42:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Staff Memo
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/1/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Kevin Jones, 4740 Wendover Street, opposed the expansion because it would interfere with farming. He <br />stressed that the expansion would affect farming in many ways. He said clean available well water was <br />essential to his fanning operation. He said Delta would not drill him a new well if his went dry because of <br />quarry operations. He said dust was an area of concern when raising healthy crops and raised concern over <br />dust.emanating'from the quarry. He said farmland had higher resource value than a quarry and noted that <br />Lane County had less than 10 percent of prime farmland left. <br /> <br />Jeff Ankeny, 3120 Admiral, said his property bordered the north side of Delta's property and had never. <br />impacted his farming operation. He strongly supported the application and stressed the need for gravel in <br />the community. <br /> <br />Kurt Eaton, 408 Salty Way, said his family lived in the 'significant impact area.' He said the area of <br />question was significantly different than other land being used by Delta. He noted that the expansion area <br />was bordered by residential areas on three sides and raised concern over dust emissions from the quarry. <br />He asked that the commissions deny the application. <br /> <br />Mark Reed, 719 East Beacon Drive, said he was geologist and specialized in resource geology. He said <br />he was concerned over supply of aggregate, supply of farmland, and high quality of scientific work in the <br />context of government decision making. He said sampling was a key part of his work. He said there were <br />excellent alternatives to sand and gravel in Oregon. As an example, he said basalt production could be <br />increased. Mr Reed submitted material into the record. <br /> <br />Steve HiD 2942 Windgate Street, supported the application. He said property owners should have the right <br />to do what they wanted with their own property. He urged the commissions to consider the need for gravel <br />in Lane County. He stressed that Delta would do all it could to mitigate impacts and live by the letter of <br />the law. <br /> <br />Clyde Reek, 55 Delay Drive, spoke as the owner of the tree nursery. adjacent to the quarry that leases <br />acreage on the subject property. He said he had lived on his property since 1945. He said his nursery <br />made more dust than Delta ever thought of making and no one complained. He noted that an adjacent <br />fanner made huge amounts of dust during his operations. <br /> <br />Regarding flooding, Mr. Beek said if Delta's pit had not been there in 1996 then there would have been <br />flooding along Admiral Street. He noted that the land in question had been farmed by him in the past and <br />he had lost 70 percent of his crop. . <br /> <br />Regarding moving the quarry, Mr. Beek stressed that a quarry had to go where the aggregate was located. <br /> <br />Randy Hledik, Wildish Sand and Gravel Company, urged the commissions to consider that the amount of <br />land designated in the Metropolitan Area General Plan for aggregate extraction had. not changed in 20 <br />years but during those 20 years millions of tons of aggregate had been mined and used in the local <br />community. .He said there was no substitute for rawaggregat~ for building material. . He said ,future <br />demand would further reduce supply. He stressed that aggregate was not a renewable resource. He <br />stres,sed that Sand and Gravel was a Goal 5 resource and deserved the same protection as other resources <br />with that designation. He said aggregate sources close to their point of use needed to be preserved for <br />future use. <br /> <br />MINUTES~Lane County Planning. Commission ' <br />Eugene Planning Commission <br /> <br />',:-November 15,.2005 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.