Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Greg See, 2746 Taito Street, showed his property on an overhead projector. He. urged the commissions to <br />deny the application because citizens had not had the opportunity to study and refute the scientific <br />evidence presented by the applicant. He asked for a 90 day extension of the record to complete that work. <br />He said the expansion would cause significant harm to the surrounding areas and added that no noise <br />studies had been done for the residential areas further away from the quarry. He added that the poople in <br />the area needed proof that the underground dam would not affect the local water table. He acknowledged <br />that Delta had been a good neighbor and provided good jobs but said the question was not about jobs but <br />about a rezone that would affect the community. <br /> <br />Scott Landgreen, 296 Hunsaker Lane, said there was dust problem almost a half a mile from the existing <br />quarry and his property would have a worse problem if the quarry were to expand. He also raised concern <br />over flooding of his property. He added that he had received no notice of the planned expansion. <br /> <br />Russ Fish, 2795 Summer Lane, maintained that dust did blow to the south of the quarry. He said the land <br />should stay zoned as agricultural and urged the commissions to deny the application. <br /> <br />Tyler Trumball, 445 Salty Way, raised concern over impacts to a very nice area if the quarry were to <br />expand. He said expansion might force people out of the neighborhood if their property values decreased <br />because of the quarry operation. . . <br /> <br />Seeing no one else wishing to, testify, Mr. Dignam called for options from Planning Director Howe on how <br />to proceed. <br /> <br />Mr. Howe recommended leaving the written record open for two weeks, two additional weeks for new <br />information to be submitted and an additional week for applicant rebuttal. He said if commissioners had <br />questions they could e-mail them to him. <br /> <br />Eugene Planning Commissioner Jon Belcher questioned whether there were any statutory requirements <br />that would disallow extending the hearing for more than two weeks. <br /> <br />Mr. .Howe said there were no such requirements. <br /> <br />Eugene Planning Commissioner John Lawless suggested leaving the record open for 90 days. He said two <br />weeks seemed inadequate for research time. <br /> <br />Lane County Planning Commissioner Steve Carmichael agreed and suggested a longer 'period than two <br />weeks. <br /> <br />Lane County Planning Commissioner Jozef Zdzienicki suggested leaving the record open for 90 days. He <br />noted that some of the people.who testified had said they received no notice. <br /> <br />Lane County Planning Commissioner Lisa Arkin supported the suggestionto leave the record open for 90 <br />days. She stresse~ the need' for the commissions to make an informed decision. <br /> <br />Planning Director Howe stated that the county met all legal requirements for public notice of the hearing. <br /> <br />MINUTES~Lane County Planni~g Commission. <br />Eugene Planning Commission <br /> <br />No'v'ember 15,2005 <br /> <br />Page 9 <br />