My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 1: PH on Ordinance Amending Metro Plan (Delta Sand and Gravel)
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 11/01/06 JEO Meeting
>
Item 1: PH on Ordinance Amending Metro Plan (Delta Sand and Gravel)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:18:50 PM
Creation date
10/26/2006 8:42:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Staff Memo
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/1/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />stressed that there would be no change in existing operations. He noted that he was asking for a longer life for his <br />company. He stressed that additional resource did not mean increased production. He said things did not 'work that <br />way. He said economics and demand controlled what could be produced and sold. He stressed that Delta competed <br />for its contracts and customers. He said the amount of resource Delta had did not have anything to do with what <br />demand and the market allowed. He stressed that Delta had to earn its customers. He said he had never been <br />interested in growth for growth's sake. He acknowledged that Delta had grown some over the years and could <br />grow more in the future. He said the company would have to grow as its customers grew and demand increased. <br />He reiterated that Delta would have to grow to keep up with its customers and remarked that if a company like his <br />was out of supply then it was out of business. He reiterated that he was asking for a longer life forthe company. <br />The company's application stood on its own merits. He urged the commissions to remember when making their <br />decisions that Delta had given up 45 acres of resource land to protect a heron rookery near the site. He stressed that <br />his company provided more than family wage jobs and extraordinary benefits for his employees and added that he <br />would like to continue doing that for another 20 years. <br /> <br />Gordon Loeschen, 28700 Lake Side Drive in Corvallis, said he had worked for Delta Sand and Gravel for 20 <br />years. He showed an aerial map of the Delta property to illustrate the setback limits proposed by Delta. <br /> <br />Mr. Loeschen showed a graph of production rates since. 1964. He said there had been an average of one percent <br />growth per year since that 'time. <br /> <br />Dan Stotter, 627 Country Club Road, spoke as the attorney for the opposition. He spoke in opposition to the <br />application. He submitted exp~rt written testimony into the record on aggregate/geology, air pollution, natural <br />resources/wetlands, groundwater hydrogeology, and noise impacts. He said the frrst section of the packet contained <br />information on aggregate and geqlogic resource criteria required by the PAPA process in the Oregon <br />Administrative Rules. He said the information was supplied by Dr. Mark Reed who was an economic geologist at <br />the University of Oregon. 'He said the next section contained information on air pollution impacts of the proposal <br />and was presented by Camile Sears who had more than 25 years experience as an expert in air pollution and air <br />dispersion modeling as well as risk assessment. He said the health and medical impacts of particulate were <br />provided by Dr. Stephen Kimberly who specialized in internal medicine. He said the information on natural <br />resources and wetland issues was provided by Dr. Ethan Perkins who is a highly respected natural resources expert <br />and wetlands consultant. He stated that the ground water and hydrogeology was prepared by Malia Kupillas who <br />was an expert on ground water and hydrogeology issues. The section on noise and sound impacts was prepared for <br />. noise engineer Arthur Noxon. Regarding agricultural impacts, Mr. Stotter said the information was prepared by <br />Ross Penhallegon who was an agricultural expert working for the Oregon State University Extension Service. He <br />added that this section contained letters from nearby impacted farms that detailed the significant increased costs and <br />changing farm practices that would result from the application. <br /> <br />Mr. Stotter requested an extension of the hearing to address the new information submitted by the applicant. <br /> <br />Mr. Stotter presented written information on air pollution fro.m the report written by Camille Sears. He said the <br />report stated. that the Delta's air quality evaluation was based on flawed and inadequate information and was <br />unreliable. He said her conclusion was that the applicant's air quality conclusions were not supported by <br />appropriate evidence in the record. He said one of the most interesting sections.ofthe report was the section on <br />meteorological conditions including wind direction and velocity~ .He said she had indicated that if the proposed <br />expansion were approved the dust exposure problems to the west of the area would increase significantly. He said <br />the area would be impacted with inhalation particulate matter 60 percent of the time during the dryer months and 50 <br />percent of the time the entire year. He said one of her greatest concerns was that there was no air dispersion <br /> <br />. MINUTES-Lane County Plamring Commissiori. . <br />Eugene Planning Commission <br /> <br />January 17, 2006 <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.