My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: Adoption of 2007 Legislative Policies
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 11/08/06 Work Session
>
Item A: Adoption of 2007 Legislative Policies
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:58:22 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 9:01:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/8/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />III. Financing State and Local Government <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />A. TAX POLICY <br /> <br /> <br />The adoption and subsequent implementation of Ballot Measure 50 has substantially changed <br />cities' approach to certain financial issues. With control of property taxes slipping further from <br />local governments, it is imperative for cities to retain and expand both the revenue-raising <br />authority and the revenue sources that they presently have. State tax policy has direct and <br />indirect effects on the financial welfare of Oregon’s cities. <br /> <br /> <br />General Precepts <br /> <br />1. RAINY-DAY FUND <br /> <br /> <br />The State should not take action that (1) reduces cities’ <br />P <br />Oregon is one of only a few states in the <br />revenue, (2) increases costs to cities, or (3) preempts local <br />U.S. without an adequately funded <br />authority to raise revenue. If the State takes any of these <br />“rainy-day fund” to provide revenue <br />actions, cities should be reimbursed for lost revenues or <br />stability in the event of economic <br />increased costs. <br />downturn. The State's primary general- <br /> <br />fund revenue source is the income tax, <br />Decisions about local services should continue to be <br />P <br />which fluctuates with the economy. <br />made at the local level. <br />These income tax revenues were positive <br />during the years of a strong economy in <br /> <br />most of Oregon, but as of late proven <br />Support actions to sustain the stability and adequacy of <br />P <br />inadequate to support continuing levels <br />local revenue sources through positive and negative <br />of state services while the economy is in <br />economic cycles. <br />a slow period. <br /> <br /> <br />Support actions to maintain or improve the stability of <br />P <br /> <br />State revenue sources. <br />While stability of the state revenue <br /> <br />system does not have a dollar-for-dollar <br />impact on cities, in the current economic <br />The State should help cities to keep pace with the costs <br />P <br />downturn it is possible that state <br />of growth, particularly infrastructure needs associated <br />programs of importance to cities could <br />with growth. <br />falter. Cities as well as other local <br /> <br />governments will likely suffer reductions <br />Support the use of System Development Charges (SDCs) <br />P <br />in state shared revenue as well as <br />to fund capital improvements for police, fire, schools and <br />City of Eugene Legislative Policies, 2007 Session <br />other local government services affected by new <br />With IGR Mtg 10/17 and 10/development. 26 Amendments C:\Documents and Settings\ceexelf\Local Settings\Temporary Internet <br />Files\OLK10B\LegPol2007Sesxx1.doc <br />Updated on: 11/6/2006 By: Last saved by ceexmfw <br /> 13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.