My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: Adoption of 2007 Legislative Policies
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 11/08/06 Work Session
>
Item A: Adoption of 2007 Legislative Policies
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:58:22 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 9:01:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/8/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />increased demands for services due to reductions in state programs. <br /> <br />An adequate "rainy-day fund" has been identified as a critical way for the State to offset sudden reduction <br />in revenues. It would not provide complete revenue replacement to the state during economic difficulties, <br />but would provide some cushion for existing general fund programs if funding were to drop precipitously. <br />State-shared revenues could also be protected <br />during an economic downturn if such a fund was in <br /> <br />place. The State’s current financial difficulties <br />would clearly have been lessened if, in more <br />Local Government Revenue <br /> <br />prosperous times, the legislature had set aside <br /> <br />surplus revenues in such a fund. <br />Support the adequate funding of a state “Rainy <br />P <br /> <br />Day Fund” to provide revenue stability in the <br /> Recommendation: <br />event of economic downturn. <br /> <br /> <br /> 1. Support the adequate <br />In stabilizing state revenue, the State should <br />P <br />funding of a state “rainy- <br />avoid destabilizing local revenue. <br />day fund” to provide <br /> <br />revenue stability in the <br />Any new exemptions, deferrals or forgiveness <br />event of economic P <br />of property taxes should be granted by local <br />downturn. However, in <br />governments rather than through Legislative <br />stabilizing state revenue, <br />action because of the direct impact that such <br />the State should avoid <br />exemptions have on local government revenue. <br />destabilizing local <br />revenue. <br /> <br /> <br />If the State grants an exemption that results in a <br />P <br />revenue loss to local governments, the <br /> <br />governments should be reimbursed for the <br /> <br /> 2. STATE TAX STRUCTURE <br />revenue loss. <br /> <br /> <br />Proposals to restructure or change <br />The Legislature should revisit all property tax <br />P <br />the State's tax system must allow <br />exemptions in light of the new revenue <br />local governments to finance the <br />environment for local government. <br />level of services demanded by <br /> <br />their citizens. Cities must <br />maintain local flexibility to initiate <br />Oppose any exemption from taxation for the <br />P <br />revenue sources with local voter <br />intangible personal property of centrally assessed <br />approval, and to retain local <br />companies. If such an exemption is granted, the state <br />should reimburse cities for lost revenue. <br />apportionment of revenue from <br />State gas, liquor, beer and wine <br />taxes, and other revenues. <br />City of Eugene Legislative Policies, 2007 Session <br />With IGR Mtg 10/17 and 10/26 Amendments C:\Documents and Settings\ceexelf\Local Settings\Temporary Internet <br />Files\OLK10B\LegPol2007Sesxx1.doc <br />Updated on: 11/6/2006 By: Last saved by ceexmfw <br /> 14 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.