Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT E <br /> <br />Questions Regarding the Railyards Property <br /> <br />The Council considered issues related to making application for an enterprise zone <br />designation at the March 7, 2005 work session. At that meeting, the Council directed that <br />property contained within the railyards be excluded from the proposed enterprise zone <br />boundary. Staff subsequently published an amended map that excluded the railyards <br />property. <br /> <br />In making these adjustments to the proposed enterprise zone boundaries, City staff relied <br />on map information provided by the State Department of Environmental Quality to <br />determine the location and dimensions of the railyards property. The DEQ map was <br />drawn in the early 1990's as part of initial environmental investigations completed on the <br />site. As was pointed out in public testimony at the April 11, 2005 Council meeting, there <br />are seven parcels of property at the north end of the railyards property that are adjacent or <br />proximate to the railroad right of way, and yet continue to be included within the <br />proposed enterprise zone. It was suggested in public testimony that these properties were <br />either part of the current railyards, or part of the historic railyards property; and, as such, <br />should also be excluded from the proposed enterprise zone. <br /> <br />Councilor Polling has asked several questions regarding these properties, as follows: <br /> <br />1. How or why did the seven tax lots identified by citizens get included in the <br />proposed EZ boundary when the wording and intent of the motion was to remove <br />railroad property? <br /> <br /> As stated above, the staff relied on railyards boundary information provided by <br /> the DEQ when amending the map as directed by Council to remove the railyards. <br /> The seven tax lots are not within the railyards as depicted in the map data <br /> provided by DEQ. However, the DEQ study area encompasses additional <br /> properties owned by various private parties, including industrial and residential <br /> properties outside of the railyards boundary, but within the area of environmental <br /> concern. The seven parcels in questions are part of the area outside of the <br /> railyards that was included in the DEQ study area. These parcels are different in <br /> character from the railyards in that they are parceled, zoned, and include a mix of <br /> ownership and uses. The area eliminated from the proposed boundary is un- <br /> parceled, un-zoned property in sole ownership of the railroad. <br /> <br />2. Is the railroad the sole owner of the seven tax lots? <br /> <br /> No. Southern Pacific Co. (the railroad) is listed as the owner of two of the <br /> parcels, which total 25.7 acres. Four of the parcels are owned by Santa Fe <br /> Pacific Pipeline Partner's, LP. These four parcels total 24.1 acres. Pick and Pull <br /> LLC owns one parcel totaling 49.3 acres. <br /> <br /> <br />