My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-10-17 City Council Agenda Packet
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2017
>
05-10-2017
>
05-10-17 City Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2017 4:21:10 PM
Creation date
5/12/2017 4:21:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/10/2017
CMO_Effective_Date
5/10/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2!),2/!$ 15)%4 :/.% 05",)# 3526%9 !.!,93)3ȴ <br />(Appendix D) <br /> <br />The survey asked six questions: how close do you live or work to the downtown rail line; would you <br />like to have a quiet zone established in Eugene; how do you think a quiet zone should be funded; <br />what do you like about the proposal to create a quiet zone in Eugene; what changes would you like <br />to see in the proposal; and do you have any other comments about a railroad quiet zone. Name and <br />email information was optional for respondents. <br /> <br />Question Count Percentage <br />3´¯¯®±³ ¥®± 1´¨¤³ :®¤Ȉ <br /> <br /> Yes 124 53% <br /> No 103 45% <br /> No answer 4 2% <br />0±®·¨¬¨³¸ ³® °´¨¤³ ¹®¤ ¨ ¶®±ª ®± ±¤²¨£¤¢¤Ȉ <br /> <br /> Within ¼ mile 100 43% <br /> ¼ to 1 mile 53 23% <br /> 1 mile or more 77 33% <br /> 45 46% of ¼ mile respondents <br />±¤²¯®£¤³² ² ¨£ ¸¤²Ȉ <br />ȬΘΓω ®¥ <br /> 51 53% of ¼ mile respondents <br />±¤²¯®£¤³² ² ¨£ ®Ȉ ³®³ « o ²´±µ¤¸ ±¤²¯®²¤²ȭ <br /> <br />ȴ 4§¤ ®«¨¤ ²´±µ¤¸ ¶ ² ®³ ²¢¨¤³¨¥¨¢ £ ³§¤ ´³§¤³¨¢¨³¸ ®¥ ³§®²¤ ±¤²¯®£¨¦ ¢ ®³ ¡¤ <br />µ¤±¨¥¨¤£ȁ <br /> <br />In addition to quantitative analysis (counting and comparing the numbers of certain responses) a <br />qualitative analysis was done to identify key themes in the responses. <br /> <br /> <br />Noise pollution relief, improved quality of life, and or improved sleep <br />o <br />35 mentions <br />Funding options, combination of sources, spread out over time <br />o <br />10 mentions <br />Other themes: <br />o <br />Improves safety <br />o <br />Public outreach and engagement <br />o <br />Helps businesses <br />o <br />Crossing improvements, quad gates <br />o <br />Look at Salem and other cities with quiet zones <br /> <br /> <br />Expand quiet zone <br />o <br />11 mentions \[majority mention including Irvington area\] <br />Identify other funding sources, lower cost <br />o <br />17 mentions <br />Concerns over street closures, Lawrence vs. Lincoln, Jefferson as a one way, prefer gates and <br />signage over closures <br />o <br />16 mentions <br /> 18 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.