My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-10-17 City Council Agenda Packet
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2017
>
05-10-2017
>
05-10-17 City Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2017 4:21:10 PM
Creation date
5/12/2017 4:21:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/10/2017
CMO_Effective_Date
5/10/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Postpone until other priorities are met, addressing homelessness <br />o <br />8 mentions <br />Other themes: <br />o <br />Include bicycle and pedestrian improvements, safety <br />o <br />Provide more specific around sounds and safety after implementation of proposed <br />quiet zone, and funding <br />o <br />Examine alternatives, such as fences, lighting, tunnel <br /> <br /> <br />o <br />Using the financial strategies memo, respondents indicated with approach they favored: <br />o <br />Proposal 1 (one large GO bond) 12 in favor <br />o <br />Proposal 2 (combine RURD and GO bond) 10 in favor <br />o <br />Proposal 3 (use existing and new revenue) 26 in favor <br />o <br />22 respondents described a combination of funding sources, this most closely resembles <br />option 3, and combining these results gives 46 for proposal 3. This is 24% of the total <br />response and 66% of those that selected a proposal (46/70). <br />o <br />192 responded to this question out of 229 total survey responses for an 84% participation <br />rate. <br /> <br /> <br />Would like quiet zone, in support of, as soon as possible, grateful for process, bothered by <br />the noise, long over due <br />o <br />58 mentions <br />Project not a priority for City, waste of money, cost too high <br />o <br />33 mentions <br />Affordable housing, equity, gentrification concerns <br />o <br />21 mentions <br />Proximity to railroad as choice <br />o <br />18 mentions <br />Enjoy listening to horns, not bothered by the sound or trains were here first mentions <br />o <br />18 mentions <br />Does not improve safety <br />o <br />16 mentions <br />Includes 2 comments on accessibility concerns <br />Whiteaker neighborhood <br />o <br />14 mentions <br />Benefits developers at expense of local community <br />o <br />8 mentions <br />Other themes: <br />o <br />Noise pollution, quality of life, improves safety <br />o <br />Street closures, Lincoln and other <br />o <br />Expanding quiet zone <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 19 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.