My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda - 04/19/05 JEO Mtg.
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 04/19/05 JEO
>
Agenda - 04/19/05 JEO Mtg.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 11:20:13 AM
Creation date
4/14/2005 4:45:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/19/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment C <br /> <br />C. Growth Management Goals, Findings, and Policies <br /> <br />To effectively control the potential for urban sprawl and scattered urbanization, compact growth <br />and the urban growth boundary (UGB) are, and will remain, the primary growth management <br />techniques for directing geographic patterns of urbanization in the community. In general, this <br />means the filling in of vacant and underutilized lands, as well as redevelopment inside the UGB. <br /> <br />Outward expansion of the UGB will occur only when it is proven necessary according to the <br />policies set forth in this Metro Plan, particularly in this element. <br /> <br /> Goals <br /> <br />1. Use urban, urbanizable, and rural lands efficiently. <br /> <br />2. Encourage orderly and efficient conversion of land from rural to urban uses in response <br /> to urban needs, taking into account metropolitan and statewide goals. <br /> <br />3. Protect rural lands best suited for non-urban uses from incompatible urban encroachment. <br /> <br />Findings and Policies <br /> <br />F~d~gs <br /> <br />1. Many metropolitan areas within the United States that have not implemented geographic <br /> growth management techniques suffer from scattered or leapfrog urban growth that <br /> leaves vacant and underutilized land in its path and encourages isolated residential <br /> developments far from metropolitan centers. Until adoption of the 1990 Plan's urban <br /> service area concept, portions of this metropolitan area were characterized by these <br /> phenomena. <br /> <br />2. Beneficial results of compact urban growth include: <br /> <br /> a. Use of most vacant let~over parcels where utilities assessed to abutting property <br /> owners are already in place. <br /> <br /> b. Protection of productive forest lands, agricultural lands, and open space from <br /> premature urban development. <br /> <br /> c. More efficient use of limited fuel energy resources and greater use of bicycle and <br /> pedestrian facilities due to less miles of streets and less auto dependence than <br /> otherwise would be required. <br /> <br /> d. Decreased acreage of leapfrogged vacant land, thus resulting in more efficient and <br /> less costly provision and uSe of utilities, roads, and public services such as fire <br /> protection. <br /> <br /> II-C-1 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.