My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda - 04/19/05 JEO Mtg.
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 04/19/05 JEO
>
Agenda - 04/19/05 JEO Mtg.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 11:20:13 AM
Creation date
4/14/2005 4:45:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/19/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
e. Greater urban public transit efficiency by providing a higher level of service for a <br /> given investment in transit equipment and the like. <br /> <br />3. The disadvantages of a too-compact UGB can be a disproportionately greater increase in <br /> the value of vacant land within the Eugene-Springfield area, which would contribute to <br /> higher housing prices. Factors other than size and location of the UGB and city limits <br /> affect land and housing costs. These include site characteristics, interest rates, state and <br /> federal tax laws, existing public service availability, and future public facility costs. <br /> <br />4. Periodic evaluation of land use needs compared to land supply provides a basis for <br /> orderly and non-excessive conversion of rural land to urbanizable land and provides a <br /> basis for public action to adjust the supply upward in response to the rate of consumption. <br /> <br />5. Prior to the late 1960s, Eugene and Springfield had no growth management policy and, <br /> therefore, growth pattems were generally dictated by natural physical characteristics. <br /> <br />6. Mandatory statewide planning goals adopted by the Land Conservation and Development <br /> Commission (LCDC) require that all communities in the state establish UGBs to identify <br /> and separate urbanizable land from rural land. <br /> <br />7. Between 1970 and 1983, Springfield's population increased about four percent and <br /> Eugene's about 2.5 percent a year, but unincorporated portions of the metropolitan area <br /> experienced a population decline. About 17 percent of the total increase in the <br /> population was related to annexations. This indicates that growth is occurring in cities, <br /> which is consistent with the compact urban growth concept and limitations on urban <br /> scatteration into unincorporated areas, as first embodied in the 1990 Plan. <br /> <br />8. In addition to Finding 7 above, evidence that the UGB is an effective growth <br /> management tool includes the following: <br /> <br /> a. Consistent reduction over time of vacant land within the UGB. <br /> <br /> b. Reduction of vacant residential zoned land in Springfield and Eugene. <br /> <br /> c. Greater value of vacant land within Springfield and Eugene than similar land <br /> outside incorporated areas but within the UGB. <br /> <br /> d. Increase since 1970 of the proportionate share of residential building permits <br /> issued within city limits. <br /> <br />9. Reduction in the use of zoning provisions 'and regulatory processes that favor single- <br /> family detached dwellings on standard size parcels would increase the opportunity to <br /> realize higher net residential densities than are presently occurring, particularly in newly <br /> developing areas. <br /> <br /> II-C-2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.