Laserfiche WebLink
for review were that the proposal was consistent with the relevant statewide planning goals and resulted in <br />internal consistency with the Metro Plan. He said staff had found that both of those criteria for amending <br />the Metro Plan were met and supported a recommendation for the amendment. He said that the planning <br />commissions could deliberate following the staff presentations and either act as a joint body or deliberate <br />and act separately. <br /> <br />Bill Van Vactor, Lane County Administrator, stated that when the Metro Plan was acknowledged in 1982 <br />funding of local government was significantly different and consisted of a tax base system that could <br />grow at six percent per year. He said that Lane County, Eugene, and Springfield all had a funding <br />mechanism that allowed for a reasonable amount of growth to occur each year; subsequently ballot <br />measures had capped property taxes at $15 per thousand, with $5 for education and $10 for general <br />government. He said that when voters approved measures that exceeded those limits compression <br />occurred, first of local option levies and then of permanent rates. He said that subsequently Ballot <br />Measure 50 had the effect of rolling back assessed values statewide by 17 percent and capping growth at <br />3 percent annually, creating permanent tax rates for which no legal mechanism existed for requesting a <br />permanent rate increase from the voters. He said that the service district was a permanent solution to <br />stabilize funding and preferable to a local option levy that would be limited to five years. He stated that <br />Lane County's current tax rate of $1.27 per thousi~nd was completely inadequate to provide the necessary <br />services for 325,000 county residents. He said that the addition of Secure Rural Schools revenue still left <br />Lane County with almost the lowest tax rate in the State and one more appropriate to a limited or special <br />purpose district than a unit of general purpose government charged with providing critical life, health, and <br />safety services. He indicated the public safety district would be established as an Oregon Revised <br />Statutes (ORS) 451 financing vehicle and the Board of County Commissioners would remain the <br />governing body with a five member citizen budget committee. He said the language was very narrowly <br />drafted to avoid raising policy issues with regard to urban growth or the creation of other districts. He <br />stated that the planning commissions' review was the first step in a lengthy process; when the proposal <br />went before the Boundary Commission it would focus on the compression issue and viability for <br />financing for the proposed district. He pointed out that in order for the district rate to apply inside the <br />corporate limits of a city, the city would have to provide a resolution of support for inclusion in the <br />petition formation application; a resolution of consent and approval would be required from all 12 cities <br />within Lane County and a collaborative process to set the rate and services was anticipated. <br /> <br />Commissioner Arkin asked if revenue from the district would be overseen by the county commissioners. <br />Mr. Van Vactor said that a budget committee composed of the five commissioners and five citizens <br />would provide oversight. <br /> <br />Russ Burger, Lane County Sheriff, stated that the public safety system included services ranging from <br />prevention, enforcement, arrest, incarceration, prosecution, treatment and transition, and supervision. He <br />said the system was broken and he and other County department heads were there to discuss degradation <br />of the system currently utilized to address public safety in Lane County. He said that there were 119 <br />empty beds at the jail, no burglary or property crime investigators, the domestic violence position was in <br />jeopardy each year, and the interagency narcotics enforcement team was closed last year due to budget <br />cuts. He said those were issues faced by the Sheriff's Office and similar problems existed throughout the <br />system. He stressed the importance of the fact that the system had degraded to the point that a permanent <br />solution was critical. He said the Metro Plan amendment to allow for a public safety district was the <br />opportunity for citizens to decide if they wanted dedicated funding for public safety in Lane County. <br /> <br />Lisa Smith, Lane County Department of Youth Services (DYS), declared that the public safety system in <br />Lane County faced persistent and significant financial and resource challenges. She pointed out that the <br />challenges did not occur in isolation within any department but were interconnected; what impacted one <br />part of the system impacted all other parts of the system and ultimately affected citizens and communities. <br />She said that DYS was the sole juvenile justice provider, by statute, for detention and probation services <br /> <br />MINUTES-Joint Planning Commission Public Hearing February 1, 2004 Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />