My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda - 04/19/05 JEO Mtg.
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 04/19/05 JEO
>
Agenda - 04/19/05 JEO Mtg.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 11:20:13 AM
Creation date
4/14/2005 4:45:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/19/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
in Lane County. She used charts to illustrate referrals by area, with 42 percent of referrals from the <br />Eugene area, 27 percent from the Springfield area, and 31 percent from rural areas. She commented that <br />citizens' expectations of DYS were threefold: <br /> <br /> I. hold youth offenders accountable, <br /> 2. lock up youth offenders who posed the greatest risk to the community, and <br /> 3. provide appropriate and adequate treatment to juveniles so they left the system with more skills <br /> than when they entered. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith said the current system had incurred such significant reductions that those expectations were at <br />peril and reductions in beds and treatment options undermined DYS' ability to provide a balance of <br />correction and treatment services, with most facilities operating at less than 50 percent capacity. She <br />indicated that DYS had sustained major cuts in State funding and was facing significant reductions in <br />federal funding. She stated that while DYS had been successful in securing grant funding over the past <br />ten years, those grants were expiring and a permanent, stable funding source was essential in order to <br />provide a balance of correction and treatment services to ensure community safety. <br /> <br />Alex Gardner, Lane County Assistant District Attorney, said the County's proposal would not be before <br />the commissions if there was any other feasible way to establish permanent, stable funding for public <br />safety services. He said that County employees had been struggling with grossly inadequate staffing for a <br />long time and there had been some by-products of that disadvantage that would allow citizens and elected <br />officials to determine if they were getting "bang for the buck." He encouraged commissioners to compare <br />caseloads in the District Attorney's office and supervisor to line worker ratios; the organization was very <br />lean and had existed in starvation mode for some time - there was no place else to cut. He pointed out <br />that by Constitution the District Attorney (DA) was a State employee and the DA's duties could not be <br />assumed by the cities. He said that given current caseloads the DA provided services at about one-third <br />of the cost for a city to provide those services. He provided as an example of a collaborative effort in the <br />DA's office the "24 hour team" services for victims. He said that one employee was dedicated to <br />supervising the team's 30,000 vOlunteer hours and the office provided a car, telephone, and pager system. <br />He said the program had been eliminated because the paid employee position was cut from the budget. <br /> <br />Rob Rockstroh, Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), said that his department's role in the <br />public safety system was parole and probation, mental health, and alcohol and drug treatment. He <br />described the services provided by his department that could not be provided by other entities because it <br />required police power, including civil commitment holds, closure of restaurants because of unsafe <br />practices, and quarantine for communicable diseases. He said that DHHS services were funded primarily <br />by the County with state and federal matching grants. He noted that while parole and probation services <br />were countywide, in reality most offenders were from the cities. He said that a partnership between the <br />State and County resulted in provision of services throughout the County. He described the probation and <br />parole services that provided supervision of offenders in the community and had not been funded <br />adequately in many years. He discussed the impact to DHHS of cuts in the Oregon Health Plan, <br />including loss of methadone treatment. He emphasized the seriousness of problems related to <br />methamphetamine, which demanded services from across the system. <br /> <br />Jim Gangle, Lane County Assessor, provided a brief overview of the issue of compression that resulted <br />when passage of Measure 5 limited the maximum rate, based on the real market value, on which property <br />could be taxed. He said there was a $5 rate for education and a $10 rate for government and any time that <br />$10 rate was exceeded based on the real market value, the tax collected was compressed down to $10. He <br />said the vehicle proposed to fund the public safety district was property tax by creating a new permanent <br />rate for the district and as a consequence there would begin to be compression in other governmental <br />districts depending on the amount of rate established for the public safety district. He reminded the <br />commissions that local option levies would be compressed first, then the permanent rates. <br /> <br />MINUTES-Joint Planning Commission Public Hearing February 1, 2004 Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.