Laserfiche WebLink
<br />comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />Goal 12 requires a determination of whether the proposed Post Acknowledgment Plan Amendment <br />(PAPA) will significantly impact an existing or planned transportation facility. The applicant prepared a <br />impacts of the proposed text amendment to allow transportation facilities. The analysis for the PAPA <br />compared the reasonable worst case scenario under the existing plan designations and zoning to a <br />reasonable worst case scenario under the proposed plan designation and zoning. City staff concurred <br />with the scope of the study, and the analysis is consistent with the agreed upon scope of work. <br /> <br />The analysis and technical findings set forth in showed a decline in the number <br />of PM peak hour trips associated with a development that includes a transit station. Overall, the <br />reasonable worst case scenario analysis found the existing zoning (C-2) could produce 67 PM peak <br />hour trips. The reasonable worst case scenario with inclusion of a transit station is 49 PM peak hour <br />trips (a reduction of 18 vehicle trips). found If the proposed Park and <br />Ride Transit Station use is developed consistent with the specific text amendment that allows the <br />use, it will reduce the intensity of the land use in terms of potential motor vehicle trips generated by <br />the site when compared to the potential for a retail commercial land use developed in place of as the <br />alternate.In summary, the Transportation Planning Rule is satisfied under Goal 12 criteria with the <br />proposed refinement plan amendment since the change in use permission does not represent an <br />increase in potential build-out development level trip generation. <br /> <br />Public Works staff also found that the proposed amendment neither changes the functional <br />classification of a transportation facility nor changes the standards implementing a functional <br />classification under subsections (a) or (b) of OAR 660-012-0060. Furthermore, the proposal will not <br />result in any of the impacts listed in subsection (c) of OAR 660-012-0060. <br /> <br />The cumulative result of the refinement plan amendment text change is no significant impact to the <br />proposed or planned transportation system, and the existing transportation system has adequate <br />capacity to serve the reasonable worst case development scenario (a transit station and commercial <br />development). Based on the above findings, the text amendment to allow transit facilities is <br />consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 12. <br />Goal 13 - Energy Conservation. To conserve energy. <br /> <br />The amendment does not impact energy conservation. Therefore, Statewide Planning Goal 13 does <br />not apply. The applicant also asserts that <br />policies and implementing provisions and does not state requirements with respect to other types of <br />land use decisions. To the extent that Goal 13 could be applied to the proposed amendment, the <br />amendment is consistent with Goal 13. The proposed site is located so that a future development can <br />make efficient use of energy with direct and efficient access. Therefore, the proposal is consistent <br /> <br /> <br />Goal 14 - Urbanization. To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use. <br /> <br />Findings - 6 <br /> <br />