Laserfiche WebLink
In response to questions from Mr. Pap~, Chief Tallon said the survey of 17 fire departments addressed the <br />cost and structure of service provision. The City of Gresham, because of the vote on fire district annexa- <br />tion, had published a significant amount of data about the general fund and fire district rates. He added that <br />Springfield was not actively pursuing annexation into the Willakenzie Fire District and instead was looking <br />at points of cooperation and collaboration with the department. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor agreed with the staff recommendation and preferred to retain local control and accountability. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz said the department did a good job and she would continue to support its efforts. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman agreed that the department was excellent and the issue was not just about money and local <br />control, it was also about training and quality of services. She said at a recent LOC conference, experts had <br />indicated that public safety districts were economical for small jurisdictions but when the population was <br />above 20,000 to 30,000 the economy was lost. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Kelly, moved to authorize City staff to <br /> lobby against any proposed legislation that would weaken or eliminate any <br /> of the powers or responsibilities of the Lane County Local Government <br /> Boundary Commission. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said that the council would not meet again until April 2005 and a number of bills were likely to <br />be introduced prior to that time; it would be good to have definitive council direction on those issues that <br />could preempt local control. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ expressed concern about the process when the CCIGR existed to address legislative matters. He <br />recommended that the matter be referred to the CCIGR for consideration at its next meeting. He said the <br />committee had already been given policy direction on the subject of preemption of local authority. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly pointed out that the City's Intergovernmental Relations Manager Jason Heuser indicated the <br />motion was a good idea and provide some guidance while the council was on break. He said the issue could <br />be revisited by the council after its break and the CCIGR had a certain level of authority to act when there <br />were time constraints and could even modify the council's recommendations. He said the issue related to the <br />structure of government in the Metro Plan and the general structure had served the City well; he would <br />support the motion to direct lobbying during the break and trust that the CCIGR would address any specific <br />legislation that was introduced. <br /> <br />Ms. Solomon stated that she would not support the motion and was not prepared to discuss the matter. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling agreed with Ms. Solomon. He preferred to discuss the matter with Mr. Heuser present if the <br />motion was based on his request. City Manager Taylor said that Mr. Heuser would be present at the regular <br />meeting for the agenda item related to the CCIGR. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy suggested that the motion and discussion be deferred to the regular meeting following the <br />work session when Mr. Heuser would be available. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council March 7, 2005 Page 4 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />