Laserfiche WebLink
policing model in force. Dr. Caeti also referred to performance evaluations and opined that in order to make <br />evaluations effective, field supervisors need to be present in the field. He shared that input from the EPD <br />revealed that internal responsibilities along with commitments to community organizations curtail that key <br />element to effective policing. Consequently, Dr. Caeti announced that the report recommends a watch <br />commander position be reestablished for the late-night hours; additionally, the department should make a <br />concerted effort to put the sergeants back out in the field. <br /> <br />Dr. Caeti turned to human resource issues such as discipline, performance evaluations, promotions, <br />transfers, and internal affairs. He said the general recommendation crafted by the team spelled out the need <br />for ;;redefinition" and ;;refinement" of the relationship between the EPD and the human resource function. <br />Dr. Caeti noted that several steps had already been implemented to clarify the process; however, it must also <br />be well-defined prior to the recruitment, training, selection, and discipline processes. In addition, he stated <br />that the evaluation process needed to feed back into the promotional process and in general be utilized in a <br />more effective way. <br /> <br />In conclusion, Dr. Caeti turned once again to the complaint process and recognized the changes that have <br />occurred, i.e., all complaints were now tracked. He explained that tracking provides a paper trail which <br />reveals patterns of officer conduct. Dr. Caeti stated that the team recommended (1) that the Internal Affairs <br />Unit be led by a captain-level officer, (2) that all investigative staff receive comprehensive training on how <br />to conduct investigations, and (3) that the process be completely transparent to the EPD and the City. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy thanked the presenters for an excellent presentation and called on the council for questions and <br />comments. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly referred to the Action Plan and questioned the Police Commission's role in that plan. City <br />Manager Taylor explained that the commission was currently conducting a comprehensive analysis of <br />implementing an external review board and that report is due later in the year. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly questioned if the Police Commission and/or the Human Rights Commission will be involved in the <br />implementation of the recommendations. Leonard Matarese replied that policy must be driven by the City <br />Council and it was up to that body to determine what role the two commissions will play in this process. He <br />stressed that the council was the final decision-maker with regard to all City policies. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ referred to page 13 of the report, Issue No. 1, which stated the EPD was fundamentally sound and <br />that the current problems were easily correctable. Mr. Matarese indicated that the EPD was one of the best <br />departments in the United States, and the %risis" referred to was one of expectations. He went on to say <br />that the team was impressed that the council and the community have taken such a key interest in improving <br />the level of performance within the EPD. Mr. Pap~ remarked that the term %risis" may not have been the <br />best choice of words when writing this report. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ voiced his concern that the City's job descriptions may not be accurate and additionally that all <br />City employees may not be receiving annual performance reviews. He opined that if there was improvement <br />to be made in those areas, it should be done quickly to ensure this critical management practice was well- <br />instilled within all departments. Mayor Piercy spoke to the council's strategic goals, which listed this <br />particular goal as a priority. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council March 9, 2005 Page 5 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />