Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~O8 <br /> - " .+ ". - ~ - . <br /> . +-- .. .. ,- - - ,- - - --- - - ''f' - - .... - - <br /> ~t <br /> r <br /> "A ME~TING OF THE. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE WAS HE L DON JUNE 3, 1949 AT THE OSaURN HOTEL II <br /> , ~ <br /> WITH COUNCILMEN CRU~BAKER, WELLS, AND GODLOVE; CITY MANAGER, CITY ENGINEER AND THE CITY RECORDERI <br /> PRESENT~ I: <br /> . " I <br /> , <br />~ ' . <br />.,,~'" THE COMMITTEE REPORTS THAT IT HAS RECEIVED A REQUEST F"ROM INTERESTED PARTIES THAT THE <br />,-'-' <br />..:7) COUNC I L CONSIDER AGAIN THE PROPOSAL TO WIDEN WILLAMETTE STREET. ACTING ON THIS REQUEST THIS <br />, '1::.3-. COMMITTEE HAS SET THE TIME TUESDAY, JUNE 7, 1949 AT 3:30 P.M. AT THE CITY HALL FOR A MEETING " <br /> OF" PERSONS BOTH FOR AND AGAINST THE PROPOSAL. , <br /> :' <br /> . <br /> THE 'PROPOSED PROJECT TO IMPROVE THE STREETS SOUTH OF 18TH AND WEST OF CHAMBERS BY GRADING, <br /> GRAVELING AND OILING AS THE FI RS T STAGE OF" CONSTRUCTION FOR PERMANENT STREET IMPROVEMENTS. WAS <br /> DISCUSSED. IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMM I TTEE THAT THE PROJECT PROCEED UNDER SUCH I <br /> Sf;lECIF"lCATIONS' ~ITH THE COST TO BE BORNE BY ABUTTING PROPERTY,AND WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT <br /> SUCH STRE~TS SO IMPROVED WILL BE SUBJECT TO SUCH COUNCIL POLICY ESTABLISHED REGARDING MA~NTE- <br /> NANCE OF NON-PAVED SURF"ACES. . <br /> IT IS THE ~ECOMMENDATION OF" THE COMM I TTEE THAT THE FOLLOWING SPECiF"ICATIONS ON ASPHAL TIC <br /> CONCRET~ BE ADOPTED I F" THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY ENGINEER SO RECOMMEND. . " <br /> 3-1/2" ASPHA':-TIC CONCRETE TO~ <br /> . <br /> 5," (OR MORE) CRUSHED ROCK BASE , <br /> THIS IS TO BE IN LIEU OF THE 1_1/2" ASPHALTIC TOP AND 4_1/2" ASPHA:T BA,SE ON I" (I" MINUS) <br /> CRUSHED ROCK. <br /> , <br /> DISCUSSION \VAS GIVEN TO WIDENING HILYARD, PATTERSON AND ALDER STREETS BETWEEN BROADWAY <br /> RECOMMENDATION ,OF" THE " <br /> AND I I TH AVENUE. NO DEFINITE (lOMMITTEE IS GIVEN E~CEPT THAT, THE MATTER <br /> BE REF"ERRED TO THE COUNCIL F"OR CONSIDERATION. . <br /> 1! <br /> , I <br /> A LETTER F"ROM THE UNIVERSITY OF" QREGON ADDRESSED TO THE C I T Y MAN A GE R CONCERN I NG THE <br /> PAVING OF" ,EMERALD, ON YX , AND BEECH STREETS ,WAS CONSIDERED AND IT IS RECOMMEN OED THAT THE WORK <br /> , <br /> ON THESE STREETS BE UNDERTAKEN UNDER THE REGULAR PROCEDURE WHEN PETITIONS HAVE BEEN PROP.ERL Y <br /> F"ILED AND APPROVED. " : <br /> , <br /> "A MEET~NG OF" THE MAYOR AND PUBLIC; WORKS COMMITTEE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS O~ WILLAMETTE <br /> STREET BETWEEN 11TH AVEII!UE AND 13TH AVENUE WAS HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON JUNE 7, 1949 <br /> WITH QO~NCILME~ CRUMBAKER, SM I,TH AND GODLOVE PRESENT. I. <br /> I <br /> THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER BY MAYOR JOHNSON. <br /> T~E CI~V ~ANAGER BROUGHT ON F"OR CONSIDERATION THE MATTER OF" WIDENING WILLAMETTE STREET <br /> BETWEEN I I THAN 0 13TH AVENUES AND READ ,TWO PETITIONS ON THE MATTER ADDRESSED ~O THE ,COUNC I L <br /> WITH NAMES OF" PROPERTY OWNERS WHO SIGNED THE PETITIONQ rOR AND AGAINST ;WIDENING. <br /> THE \IIIDTH OF" THE STREET WAS DISCUSSED AND IT WAS BROUGHT OUT THAT BY WIDENING THE STREET <br /> TO 52 FEE T I,T WOULD L.EAVE A ~ERY NARROW SIDEWALK. THE ORIGINAL ,ORDINANCE SETTING UP A 7- <br /> F"OOT SET-BACK WAS DISCUSSED AND EXPLAINED BY COUNCtL~AN CRUMBA'KE'R. <br /> MR. ANDE RSON AS KE 0 IF" THE C I T Y HA S ANY OTHER PLANS THAN TO WIDEN THE STREET TO .56 F"EET. " <br /> HE STATED THAT AT THE TIME THE HOSPITAL WAS REMODELED, THEY ASKED THE ENGI~EERING DEPARTMENT <br /> AND WERE TOLD THAT THE STREET WOULD BE REMqVED ,TO A 49 F"OOT STREETa HE ASKED THAT THE <br /> COUNCI~ REqONSIDER THE GR~D S~StEM AND ,THA~ T~E WHOLE OF" WILLAMETTE STREET BE MADE A TWO-WAY <br /> STREET. THE CLINIC IS WI L L IN G TO HAVE THE ,STREET WIDENED TO 49 F"EET ONLY. , . <br /> , <br /> MR'. STEVENSEN PROTESTED A 7-F"00T 6IDE~ALK ,AND REF"USED TO DONATE THE SIDEWALK TO THE ,C I TY. <br /> HE STATED THAT PROPERTY OWNERS WOULD HAVE -':0 MOVE THEIR BUILDINGS BACK AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE. <br /> , <br /> , <br /> M~s.. HASSELROOTHREAD A LETTER WHICH HAS ~EEN PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL, EXPLAINING HOW <br /> . -. . . <br /> THE WIDENING OF" WILLAMETTE STREET WOULD AF"F"ECT HER PROPERTY, THE WILLAMETTE STREET MARKET. <br /> . ' , <br /> MRS. RUSSELL, CO-OWNER OF" THE ,FLORENCE APARTMEN,TS ;STATEDTHAT THEY WERE NOT GOING TO <br /> CUT OF"F" THEIR BUILDING THE ONE F"OOT THAT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO WIDEN WILLAMETTE STREET AND i I <br /> THAT THEY WERE NOT GO I N G TO DONATE ANY PROPERTY TO THE C I T Y. SHE ASKED I F" AN YONE HAD MADE <br /> I . <br /> AN ESTIMATE OF" HOlV MUCH IT WOULD COST TO CUT 0F"f" ONE F"OOT WHICH WOULD TAKE AWAY PART OF" THEIR <br /> ENT RAN~E,.' . r <br /> THE CITY MANAGER EXPLAINED TO THE PETITIONERS THAT F"OUR LANES ARE DESIRED ON A HI GHWAY. <br /> HE STATED THAT THE DESIRED RESULT IN A BUSINESS DISTRICT IS EASE Or TRAFFIC IN GIVING PEOPLE <br /> A CHANCE TO PARK AND THAT PERHAPS THEY COULD COMPROM I SE ON ,A STREET NOT QU I T,E S,O WI DE. <br /> IT WAS BROUGHT OUT BY COUNCILMAN CRUMBAKER THAT ON A TWO-LANE OR EVEN THREE LANE STREET, I <br /> THE ONE-WAY GRID SYSTEM WOULD BE IN EFF"ECT, AND THAT UNLESS A STREET IS WIDENED TO 56-F"EET, A <br /> T-WO-WA VS TRE_E T II,OULD NOT BE C,ONS I DERED. <br /> MR. EDMONDS STATED HIS VIEWS IN F"AVOR OF" WIDENING THE STREET TO 52 OR EVEN .56 F"EET TO <br /> THE ADVANTAGE OF" THE CITY AND MERCHANTS, AND LOOKING TO THE F"UTURE. <br /> COUNCILMAN GODLOVE DISCUSSED THE WIDENING AND STATED THAT UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT THE CITY <br /> CAN AF"rORD TO CUT OFF THE BU ILDI NGS AND MAKE THE FRONTAGE UNIFORM, THE MATTER SHOULD NOT BE <br /> TAKEN UP. <br /> ;".' <br />~ <br />