Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> r"" <br /> 54 <br /> - - - -- I <br /> - - <br /> THE EMPLO YER IS ALLOWED-THREE PE R CENT OF THE AMOUNT OF THE TAX WITHHELD TO C OV E R HIS <br /> HANDLING EXPENSE. LAST YEAR ST. LOUIS COLLECTED $8,000,000 FROM T HI S TAX ALONG WITH A <br /> TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE COST OF ONLY $40,000. THE CITY OF TOLEDO, OHIO, WHI CH HAS A SiMILAR <br /> TAX, WILL BY-THE END OF 1950 HAVE RETIRED EVERY CENT OF ITS BONDED INDEBTEDNESS AND WILL <br /> HAVE AN ACCUMI:JLATED SURPLUS OF OVER 8200,000, AND IT IS PLANNED'TO AT THAT TIME REDUCE THE <br /> TAX. ALL CITIES HAVING ADOPTED THIS FORM OF MUNICIPAL TAXATION WERE WELL SATISFIED AND <br /> RECOMMENDED IT-ENTHUSIASTICALLY. My PERSONAL OBSERVATION AT THE CONFERENCE WAS THAT <br /> EASTERN CITIES-ARE FAR ADVANCED IN TAPP I NG NEW SOURCES OF INCOME FOR MtJNICIPALITIESo <br /> PORTLAND HAS ENACTED SUCH AN ORDINANCE, BUT AS USUAL WHEN THERE IS NO'STATE ENABLI NG ACT, <br /> THE ORDINANCE HAS BEEN REFERRED TO THE PEOPLE FOR VOTE AND WIl:.l BE VDTED ON IN MAY; THE I R <br /> STOPGAP TAX ORDINANCE IS ALSO NOW I NVOL VED IN LITIGATION IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON. <br /> ~ - . <br /> 20' FEDERAL HOUSING ACT (}F 1949 IT WAS EXPLAINED TO US THAT THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THE <br /> HOUSING ACT WAS TO ASSIST IN SLUM CLEARANCE AND ON THAT BAS IS THE ACT WOULD BE OF GREAT <br /> VALUE TO MUNICIPALITIES. IT IS PROVIDED IN THE ACT THAT MUNICIPALITIES COLLECT PAYMENTS <br /> IN LIEU OF TAXES. T HI S PROVISiON WAS INCLUDED AFTER MUCH WORK BY THE NIMLO. THE BILL, <br /> AS ORIGINALLY DRAWN,.WOULD HAVE ENTIRELY EXEMPTED SUCH PROJECTS FROM MUNICIPAL TAXATIONo <br /> CITIES WILL NOW RECEIVE NOT TO EXCEED 10% OF ALL RENTALS COLLECTED. I HAVE A VERY DETAILED <br /> HANDBOOK EXPLAINING T'HE ACT FOR THE USE OF ANYONE INTERESTED IN THIS SUBJECT. THERE IS NO <br /> DOU BT BUT, THAT UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES MUNICIPALITIES WILL BENEF"IT AS A RESULT OF THIS <br /> FEDERAL ACT. <br /> 3. PUBLIC UTIUTlES FRANCHISES AND RATE CASES . APPAREN TL Y THIS SUBJECT IS AGAIN BECOM I NG I <br /> IMPORTANT, DUE TO THE FACT THA T M ,AN Y UTI LIT IE S ARE FREQUENTLY ASKING FOR RATE INCREASES. <br /> CONFIRMING THE S TAT EM EN T S MADE BY OUR OWN LOCAL TRANSIT LINE SEVERAL MONTHS AGO, I FINO <br /> T HA T VIRTUALLY AL L STREET CAR LINES AND CITY BUS.LINES ARE OPERATING WITHOUT PROFIT AT- - <br /> THE,PRESENT TIME. CITY ATTORNEYS FROM VIRTUALLY EVERY C I T Y REPRESENTED STATED THAT THE I R <br /> C I T-Y HAS PERMITTED AN INCREASE IN TRANSIT f."ARES. <br /> . . . <br /> IT WAS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED THAT MUNICIPALITIES DO NOT ENTER THE TRANSPORTATION <br /> FIELD. T HE S E CITIES REQUIRING THE TRANSIT LINES TO MODERNIZE THEIR EQUIPMENT AS A <br /> CONDITION ATTACHED TO THE RATE INCREASE REPORTED VERY GOOD RESUL TS. THE IMPROVEMENT"Of' <br /> SERVICE OFFSET THE LOSS OF BUSINESS WHICH OCCURS IN EVERY CASE WHERE A RATE INCREASE IS <br /> ALLOWED. .. <br /> . <br /> MR. JEROME JOiFFEE, Pu BLI C UTILITIES COUNSEL F"OR KANSAS CITY, POINTED OUT THAT 1:J1'ILITY <br /> CASES ARE HIGHLY SPECIALIZED AND STATED THAT IT WOULD BE NOT ONLY BENEFICIAL, BUT MORE <br /> ECONOMICAL TO EMPLOY AN EXPERT ON RATES WHEN CONFRONTED WITH A REQUEST FOR AN INCREASE. <br /> THE AVERAGE C IT Y ATTORNEY HAS NOT HAD THE TECHNICAL TRAINING NECESSARY TO PROPERLY ANALYZE <br /> THE PROBLEMS INVOLVED. UTILITIES ALWAYS EMPLOY EXPERTS TO REPRESENT THEM. <br /> ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES OVER WHICH THE CITY HAS ANY CONTROL SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO FURNISH <br /> ANNUAL REPORTS FOR ANALYSIS BY ACCOUNTANTS Of' OUR OWN CHOOSING. ALL RATE CASES ULTIMATELY <br /> BOIL DOWN TO THE ES TABL I SHMENT Of' THE PROPER "RATE Of' RETURN". THIS IS :r HE WHOLE CASE <br /> AND THE ONLY PERSON WHO CAN ACCURATELY ESTABLISH T HI S FACT IS AN EXPERT ACCOUNTANT. I <br /> RE COMMEN 0 THAT THE'CITY OF EUGENE URGE THE LEA GU E Of' ORE GON CITIES TO TAKE AN ACTIVE PART <br /> IN ALL RA TE CASES COMING ON BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF ORE GON <br /> OR ANY COMMON' COUNC Il IN THE STATE WHERE THE COS T OF THE UTILITIES TO THE C'T~~~~~~NY <br /> CITY MAY BE INCREASED. (JiNLY BY BE I NG CONSTANTLY ON THE ALERT CAN WE PROTECT/THE POCKET I <br /> BOO KS OF OUR CITIZENS. <br /> REQU I REMENTS <br /> 4. ZON IN G SETBACK AREA AND HEIGHT CASES ARE STILL BE IN G F I [E D AGAINST -- <br /> CITIES CLAIMING THAT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CERTAIN ZONING RESTRICTIONS IS TAKING PROPERTY <br /> WIT HOU T DUE PROCESS Of'-LAW, AND IS, THEREFORE, UNCONSTITUTIONAL. IT IS, HOWEVER, PRETTY <br /> WELL ESTABLISHED NOW THAT ZONING RESTRicTIONS ARE A VALID EXERCISE OF THE POLICE POWER. <br /> THE CITY MUST' BE ABLE TO SHOW THAT THE ZONING REQUIREMENT IS FOR THE BENEF I,T OF THE <br /> GENERAL HEALTH, SAFETY A NO WELFARE Of' THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND NOT f'0 R THE BENEFIT OF AN <br /> IN 0 I V I DU AL . IT APPEARS THAT ZONING WILL BE A MAJOR PRO BLEM OF CI TIE S FOR YEARS TO COME. <br /> 5. LIABILITY OF C'I T Y ON, TU,RT CtAIMS IT APPEARS THAT EUGENE IS ONE Of' THE VERY FEW <br /> CITIES NOT HAVING EITHER CHARTER OR STATUTORY LIMITATION OF LIABILITY ON TORT CLAIMS. IT <br /> WAS POINTED OUT THAT THERE SHOULD BE REQUIRED SOME NOTICE TO THE C I T Y BEFORE THE CLAIMANT <br /> HAS A RIGHT TO FILE LE GAL ACTION. THE USUAL PROVISION IS THAT WRITTEN NOTICE OF THE CLAIM <br /> MUST BE GIVEN TO THE C I T Y VI IT H I N THIRTY ORSIXTY DA YS FROM THE DATE Of' THE ACCIDENT. IF <br /> NOT GIVEN, THE CLAIM IS .BARRED. I RECOMMEND THAT OUR CHARTER BE AMENDED TO INCLUDE A <br /> NOTICE REQUIREMENT AN 0 A LIMIT TO THE AMOUNT OF OUR LIABILITY TO AN Y PARTICULAR PERSON. <br /> THIS CHARTER AMEN OMEN T COULD BE SUBMITTED TO THE PE OPLE f'OR VOTE AT THE NE XT REGULAR <br /> ELECTION TO BE HELD IN MA Y, 1950. SUCH A CHARTER AMENDMENT WOUl:D NOT HAVE THE EFFECT OF <br /> MAKING OUR OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES LESS VIGILANT BE CAUSE THE Y WOULD STILL BE PE RSONALL Y <br /> L I ABLE FOR ANY NEGLIGENCE ON THE I R PA R T. <br /> 60 MUNICIPAL REVENUES FROM FEDERAU Y OWNED PROPE RTY A VERY ACTIVE COMMITTEE Of' CITY <br /> ATTORNEYS ARE NOW WORKING ON THIS MATTER. A STRONGL Y WORDED RESOLUTION TO CONGRESS WAS <br /> ADOPTED BY THE CONFERENCE URGING THE IMMEDIATE PASSAGE OF FEDERAL L.EGISLATION PROVIDING <br /> FOR PA YMEN,T IN LIEU OF T AX ,OR TAXATION OF FEDERALLY OWNED PROPERTY BY LOCAL GOVERNMENTSo <br /> THE DEVELOPMENTS IN THE FIRST SESSION OF THE 81ST CONGRESS INDICATE THA T FAVORABLE ACTION I <br /> MIGHT WELL BE TAKEN BY THE CONGRESS, IF REIl,SONABl Y ACCURATE FIGURES ON 'T HE COST TO THE <br /> ~ <br />