Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r"230 <br /> - .1: <br /> "T HE JOINT COMMITTEE APPOINTED BY YOUR ACTION TO STUDY THE FEASIBILITY OF A METRO- <br /> POLITAN SANITARY DISTRICT, COMPOSED OF THE C,TY OF EUGENE AND SPRINGFIELD AND THE AREAS <br /> .. CONSULTING <br /> SURROUNDING SAID CITIES HAS STUDIED THE ENGINEERING REPORT AS SUBMITTED BY THE <br /> ENGINEERS FOR THE PAST TWO MONTHS. Two ALTERNATIVE PLANS WERE COMPLETEL Y AND FULLY <br /> EXPLAINED IN THE ENGINEER'S REPORT, ONE BE IN G THE FORMATION OF A METROPOLITAN SEWAGE <br /> DISPOSAL DISTRICT, INCLUDING BOTH MUNICIPALITIES AND THE SURROUNDING RIJRAL AREAS, WHICH <br /> WOULD BE GOVE'RNED BY ONE INDEPENDENT BODY, PROBABL Y KNOWN AS A SEWAGE DISPOSAL AUTHORITY. <br /> THE SECOND ALTERNATIVE BE ING THE CONSTRUCTION OF ONE OR' MORE DISPOSAL PLAN T S TO BE CON- <br /> STRUCTED JOINTL'Y BY THE CITIES AND THE SURROUNDING AREAS WHICH WOULD BE FORMED INTO <br /> '1 NDEPENDENT SEWAGE DISPOSAL DISTRICTS, BASED UPON CONTRACTUAL RELATIONS. . <br /> THE- COMMI TTEE HAS HA 0 THE ASSISTANCE OFT HE STATE SANITARY AUTHORITY WHO o B T A IN E 0 <br /> AN OPINION FROM THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RELATIVE TO THE LEGALITY OF FORMING ONE METROPOLITAN <br /> SEWAGE 0'1 SPOSAL DISTRICT, INCLUDING'THE CITY OF EUGENE AND SPRINGFIELD AND SURROUNDING <br /> AREAS UNDER PRESENT STATE LAWS. THIS OPINION, IN BRIEF, STATED T HA T AREAS LOCATED WITHIN <br /> CITIES COULD NOT BE INCLUDED IN A METROPOLITAN SEW AGE DISPOSAL DISTRICT, BUT THE ALTERNA- <br /> TIVE ARRANGEMENT COULD BE MADE BY CONSTRUCTING ONE OR MORE SEWAGE DISPOSAL PLANTS W I~TH JOINT <br /> OUT'FALL L I iii E S' T 0 BE CONSTRUCTED AND OP'ERATED UNDER CONTRACTUAL AG RE EME N'T S BETWEEN C I TIES <br /> AND RURAL SANITARY DISTRICTS. THE ATTORNE Y GENERAL POINTED OUT- THAT IT WOULD BE POSS I BLE <br /> TO FORM A METROPOLITAN DISTRICT, INCLUDING CITIES, PR OV I DE D AN' ENABL I NG ACT WAS PASSED BY <br /> THE STATE LEGISLATURE. . THE COMMITTEE HAS ALSO OBTAINED A GRE A T DEAL OF MATERIAL FROM <br /> OT HE R C I'T I ES IN OREGON AND CITIES IN OTHER STATES WHI CH HA VE SET UP JO I N"T SEWAGE TREATMENT <br /> FACILITIES, EITHER UPON A CONTRACTUAL BASIS OR BY THE FORMATION OF A METROPOLITAN DISTRICT. I <br /> IT WAS INTERESTING TO NOTE THE VARIOUS METHODS OF BA S , N G PRO-RATED COS'T S OF THESE SEWAGE <br /> PLANTS AND OUTFALL LINES, AS SOME WE RE BASED UPON A POPULATION PERCENTAGE; o T HE R S UPON <br /> THE RATIO OF THE QUANTITY OF SEWAGE, TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION THE QUALITY' OF' INDUSTRIAL <br /> WASTES, AND ONE AREA USED A PERCENTAGE OF REGISTERED VOTERS AS A BASIS FOR PRO-RATI NG THE <br /> INITIAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT AND AL SO OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS. . <br /> THE COMMITTEE AT THE CONCLUSION OF ITS LAST MEE'TING ON TUESDAY, JUNE: 20-, 1950, <br /> A G RE EO TO RECOMMEN D THE FOLLOWING T HR E E AL TE RN ATI VE PLANS TO THE C I T Y COUNCILS OF <br /> SPRINGFIELD AND EUGENE: <br /> I . To REQUEST THE STATE lEGISLATURE TO PASS ENA,BL I NG LEGISLATION AT ITS NE XT SESSION <br /> TO PERMIT THE FORMATION OF ONE METROPOLITAN SEWAGE DISPOSAL DISTRICT TO INCLUDE BOT H' THE <br /> CITY OF E U GE NE AND THE CITY OF' SPRINGFIELD AND THE AREAS SURROUNDING SAID CITIES WHICH, <br /> BY REASON OF THE I R GEOGRAPHICAL LOCAT-ION,' COULD MOST FEASIBLY BE SERVED BY SUCH A DISTRICT. <br /> I F' SUCH ENABL ING LEGISL-ATION WAS PASSED TO IMMEDIATELY PROCEED TO FORM SUCH A METROPOLITAN <br /> DISPOSAL DISTRICT AND PROCEED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SEWAGE DISPOSAL PLANT, ,OUTFALL <br /> LINES AND ALL NECESSARY WORK IN CON NE.CT I ON T HE R E WIT H . <br /> 2. THAT THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD WOULD PROCEED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF SEWAGE TREATMENT <br /> FACILITIES TO SERVE THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD AND A~L-OUTLYING AREAS TO THE NORTH AND EAST <br /> OF' THE C I T Y OF SPR I NGF I EL D. <br /> THA T THE CITY OF EUGENE WOULD PROCEED WI TH THE CONSTRUCTION OF SEWAGE TREATMENT <br /> FACILITIES TO SERVE THE CITY OF EUGENE, AND THE OUTLYING AREAS TO THE NORTH AND WEST OF <br /> THE C IT y. OF EUGENE. <br /> 3. THAT THE C I TIES OF EUGENE AND SPRINGFIELD AND THE OUTLYING A RE AS SHOULD PROCEED I <br /> WITh! THE CONS-TRUCT I ON OF A JO I NT ,SEWAGE TREATMENT FACILITIES UNDER CON TRACTUAL AGREEMENTS <br /> TO SERVE THE TWO CITIES AND THE IR OUTh:YING AREAS. . . <br /> IT WAS T'HE CONSENSUS OF OPINION OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE THA T ALL POSSIBLE PLANS FOR <br /> SEWAGE DISPOSAL WERE INCLUDED IN THE CONSULTING ENGINEER'S REPORT AND THAT SUFFICIENT <br /> STUDY HAD BEEN MADE AND INFORMATION AND MATERIAL COLLECTED SO T HA T THE COMMON COUNCILS OF <br /> THE CITY OF EUGENE AND SPRINGFIELD COULD NOT ElCPRESS THE I R APPROVAL OF' ONE OR T HE OTHER <br /> OF THE ALTERNATIVE PL'AN S HEREIN SUBMITlI'EO. THE COMMITTEE WAS OF THE FU R T HER OPINION THAT <br /> AS SOON AS A DECISION WAS MA 0 E , THAT EFFORTS SHOULD BE CONTINUED TO CARRY OUT THE PLAN <br /> AND TO MAKE ALL NE CESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE ENGINEERING, CONSTRUCTION AND OPE RAT I,ON <br /> OF THE OUTFALL LINES AND SEW'A GE DISPOSAL PLANT AT AN EARLY DATE. n <br /> IT WAS MOV ED BY CRUMBAKER, SECONDED BY GODLOVE THAT THE REPORT OF THE METROPOLl TAN SEWAGE <br /> COMMITTEE BE ACCEPTED AND PLACED ON FILE: AND THAT THE MAYOR APPOINT A CITIZENS COMMITTEE OF" <br /> SIX TO WORK WITH THE PU BL I C W OR KS COMMITTEE IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY ON THE SEW AGE DISPOSAL <br /> PROJECT. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> REPORTS OF' BOAR OS AND COMMISSIONS <br /> . <br />8 A RE PO RT OF THE BOAR D OF ApPEALS - RE: VARIANCE TO ZONING ORDINANCE WAS SUBMITTED AND <br /> READ AS FOLLOWS: <br /> . . <br /> "THE BOAR 0 OF ApPEALS HELD A MEET ING JUNE 22, 1950, AT THE' CITY HALL TO CONSIDER <br /> THE F'OLLOWING RE QU EST FOR ZONING VARIANCE. <br /> MR. RICHABAUGH, WHO OWNS PROPERTY AT 939 EAST 20T H A VENUE, REQUESTS PE RM I S S ION TO I <br /> CONS TRue T A DUPLEX ON' THE REAR OF HIS LOT. <br />~ <br />