Laserfiche WebLink
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
<br />ra12 <br /> <br />1- <br />- <br /> <br />THE THIRD PLAN WAS THAT OF' AF'F'ORDING THE SAME F'ACULITIES AS OUTLTNED UNDER THE <br />SECOND 'PLAN IN TRE. OLD C.I'TY SHOP BU I LD I NG AT 5TH AND OL I VE TO ACCOMMODATE THE SAME <br />NUMBE~ OF' PRISONERS WITH ACCOMMODATIONS F'OR ~OTH MALE AND F'EMALE PRISDNERS, AND LIVING <br />QUARTERS F'OR JA I LER. I TWAS F'EL'T THAT SUCH A PROGRAM AS TH I S COULD BE ENTERED 'I NTO AND <br />AF'F'ORD PRESENTLY NEEDED JAIL F'ACILITIES AND MAINTAIN THE POLICE'DEPARTMENT AND MUNICIPAL <br />COURT' ACTIVITIES IN 'THEIR PRESENT' LOCATION AT THE CITY HALL WITH THE $70,000 AVAILABLE <br />F'OR THIS PROJECT. <br /> <br />THE CITY MANAGER WAS REQUESTED TO HAVE THE'ARCHITECT PREPARE TENTATIVE PLANS F'OR <br />THIS THIRD'ALTERNATIVE'~N~ ALSO TO CONF'ER WITH MEMBERS OF' THE PARKS AND RECREATION <br />COMMI S'SI ON' RELATIVE TO THEIR THOUGHTS 'F'OR F'UTURE UTILIZATION OF' THE OLD CONCRETE <br />RESERVOIR ON THE'BuTTE AND"'ALSO TO BRING IN FUTURE RECOMMENDATIONS PERTAINING TO'THE <br />ADMINISTRATION OF' THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WITH RELATION TO OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS AND <br />JAIL OPERATIONS. <br /> <br />.."THE'MAIN THOUGHTS IN STUDYING THESE ALTERNATIVES'F'OR FINAL APPROVAL OF THE CON- <br />STR0cTIONOF THE ~AIL WAS NOT TO IMPAIR THE CITY'S F'UTURE PLANNING F'OR PERMANtNT CITY <br />HALL DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING POLICE'.DEPARTMENT F'ACILITIES AND JAIL FACILITIES." <br />2: <br />IT WAS MOVED BY CRUMBAKER, 'SECDNDED'BY SMITH THAT THE REPORT OF THE FINANCE AND PUBLIC <br />WORKS COMMITTEE BE ADOPTED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />A'R~PORT OF' THE HEALTH AND RECREATION COMMITTEE - RE: PARK LIGHTING; PROPOSAL ~O <br />DEVELOP A RHODODENDRON, AZALEA AND CAMELLIA GARDEN AT HENDRICKS PARK WAS SUBMITTED AND READ <br />AS FOLLOWS:: <br />./ . -",-- <br />/ <br />. / "A MEET I NG OF' THE HEALTH AND RECREA T ION <br />(~195.1 WITH THE FOLLOWING PRESENT: COUNCILMAN <br />CIT~ ,MANAGER AND PARKS SUPE~INTENDENT. ' <br />+~_/ . . <br />,,'THE COMMITTEE DROVE AROUND TO REVIEW THE PROGRESS BEING MADE IN THE PARKS AND NOTED <br />JHE,NEW'PARKS AND RECREATION WAREHOUSE SHOPS AND STORAGE FACIL~TIES AT SKINNER'S BUTTE <br />PARK~ UPON THE RECOMMENDATION OF' THE CITY MANAGER THE COMMITT~E RECOMMENDS THAT THE <br />F'OLLOWING MATERIALS BE ORDEREDF'OR THE COMPLETION OF' THE PARK LIGHTING AS LISTED: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />COMMITTEE WAS HELD AT 3:00 P.M. JANUARY 15, <br />ALLEN, CHAIRMAN; COUNCILMEN WATSON AND SMITH; <br /> <br />SKINNER'S BUTTE PARK. <br />UNIVERSITY PARK' <br />SLADDEN PARK <br />WASHINGTON,PARK <br /> <br />22 LIGHTS <br />5 LIGHTS <br />7 1I GHTS <br />12 LIGHTS <br /> <br />THE GRAND TOTAL F'OR ELECTRICAL MATERIALS WILL BE $1,869.50 TO COMPLETE THE INSTALLA~ <br />TION OF' THE PARK LIGHTING WITH THE STANDARDS PREVIOUSLY PURCHASED F'ROM THE MOUNTAIN STATES <br />POWER COMPANY. THIS EXPENDITURE IS INCLUDED IN THE 1950-51 BUDGET. <br /> <br />~---.., <br />. \ <br />THE COMMI.TTEE ALSO REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL OF' THE RHODODENDRON SOCIETY TO DEVELOP A <br />POSSIBILITY OF HENDRICKS PARK F'OR A RHODODENDRON, AZALEA AND CAMELLIA GARDEN. THE <br />SOCI~TY W~LL 'ASSIST IN PROCURING PART OF THE WATER PIPE WHICH WILL BE REQUIRED AND THEY <br />WILL PROVIDE AND PLANT APPROXIMATELY 300 TO 500 PLANTS AT A VALUE OF' $2;500.00 WITHOUT <br />ANY COST TO THE CITY. IT IS ESTIMATED THE C,TY'S SHARE OF THE ENTIRE PROJECT COULD BE <br />DONE" F'OR $500 OR LESS I'NCLUD I NG 'FENC I NG' AND I NSTALL I NG WATER SYSTEM. I NASMUCH AS THERE <br />IS MONEY AVAILABLE IN THE 1950-51 PARKS AND RECREATION BUDGET, IT WAS RECOMMENDED BY THE <br />COMM I'TTEE THAT $500 BE AUTHOR I ZED FOR TH I S PURPOSE. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY SMITH, SECONDED BY BOOTH THAT THE REPORT OF' THE HEALTH AND RECREATION <br />" COMMI TTEE :BE 'ADOPTED. ROLLCALL VOTE.. MOT I ON CARR I ED. <br />. ", <br /> <br />'---~ <br /> <br />REPORTS OF.BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS <br /> <br />6 A REPORT OF THE BOARD OF' ApPEALS - RE: REQUESTS F'OR SETBACK VARIANCES WAS SUBMITTED AND <br />READ AS FOL'LOWS: <br /> <br />". "THE' BOARD OF' ApP~ALS HE LD <br />REQUESTS FOR SETBACK VARIANCES. <br />GILLILAN AND MR. VAALER. <br /> <br />A MEETING JANUARY 18,1951 TO CONSIDER THE F'OLLOWING <br />PRESENT WERE MR. LUVAAS, MR. STIEN, MR. WILMSEN,MR. <br /> <br />.I '. ~ REQUEST OF REV; JOSEPH GUNTHER F'OR WA I VER OF' THE 50-FOOT S I DE LINE SETBACK REQU I RED <br />FOR CHURCH S~RUCTURES I~ RESIDENTIAL ZONE. <br /> <br />REV. GUNTHER OWNS AND MAINTAINS A RESIDENCE AT 1905 ARTHUR STREET AND rs PURCHASING <br />THE ,LOT ADJO I N I NG TO THE SOU,TH F'OR PURPOSE OF ERECT I NG A CHURCH. THE LOTS ARE 75 X 150' <br />AND 134 X 150' IN SIZE. <br /> <br />.,';' <br /> <br />SINCE THE VARIANCE OF' SETBACK WILL NOT AF'FECT ANY PROPERTY OTHER THAN MR. GUNTHER'S <br />AND THERE WOULD,BE 50-FEET BETWEEN THE 'PARSONAGE AND' CHURCH THE BOARD GRANTED THE REQUEST. <br /> <br />2. REQUEST F'ROM MR. Roy ELLIOTT REPRESENTING THE CENTRAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH F'OR WAIVER <br />OF THE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS PERTAINING TO TYPE OF' CONSTRUCTION AND SETBACK REQUIRE- <br />MENTS. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~. <br />