|
<br />~70'
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />AFTER CONS I DERABLE STUDI ES BY GRAHAM SMI TH, ARCHI.TECTS' AND C.A.A. AND UNI TED,
<br />AIRLINES ARCHfTECTS, PRELIMINARY PLANS AND ESTIMATES WERE SUBMITTED RECENTLY FOR THE
<br />_PURCHASE AND REMODELING OF UNITED AIRLINES TERMINAL BUILDING WHICH WOULD TOTAL
<br />$121,360. IT WAS FELT THIS COST WAS TOO GRE~T TO GO AHEAD WITH THIS PROJECT UNDER
<br />PRESENT ALLOCATED CITY fUNDS AS BUDGETED FOR 1952, TOTALING $24,6~0.
<br />
<br />~T A RECENT MEETI NG WITH C.A.A. AND UNITED AIRLINES OfFICIALS, IT' WAS SUGGES~ED
<br />T HAT A N A L T ERN ATE ,P L A,N" ;B E S U BM I T T ED TO CON S T R U C T A NEW A OM I N 1ST R A TI 0 N B U I L 0,1 N G 0 NTH E
<br />EAST' SI DE Of MAHL:ON SWEET AI RPORT AS OR I GI NALLY PLANNED-. 'uNDER THI S PLAN, THE CI TY
<br />WOULD 'NOT 'PURCHiASE UNITED AIRLINES TERMINAL BUILDING BUT WOULD MATCH C.A.A. fUNDS
<br />UPON A 56/44% (44% CITY) BASIS. SPACE REQUIREMENTS, PRELIMINARY PLANS AND E.5TI.MATES
<br />~ERE SUBMITTED TO THE COMM1TTEE UNDER THIS NEW PROGRAM WH,ICH ARt AS fOLLOWS: .
<br />
<br />BASIC BID:
<br /> WEA THER: BUREAU - , 1150 SQ. FT. @ $15 $ 17,250
<br /> .. .... .......... ............
<br /> C..A'-A. (FIRST & SECOND FL OOR ) . . '. . . . . . . . . . . . 1344 SQ. FTo @ $1_5 '- $ 20,160
<br /> TOILETS, UTILITIES, STAIRS & CORR I DORS. .. '.. .1815 SQ. fT. @ $15 - $ 27,225 '
<br /> TOTAL BASIC BID. . ... . . . .' . . ... . . . . . . . . . . '. 4309 SQ. fT. @ $15 - $ 64,635
<br /> -
<br />AL TERNATE NO. I:
<br /> LOBBY & WAITING SPACE.'~~...'...~..........'.. 1525 SQ. fT. @ $15 - $ 22,875
<br />AL TERNf1.TE NO. 2-':
<br /> AIRLINE No. & CONCOURSE................. . ' 855 SQ. fT. @ $15 - $ 12,825
<br />ALTERNATE NO. 3:
<br /> AIRLI NE No. 2 '& 'C 0 N"C O'U R 5 E . . . .'~ . . . .... . . . . . . . .. 1440 SQ. f'T'. @ $15 - $ 21,600
<br />ALTERNATE NO. 4:
<br /> CONTROL TOWER, EQUIPMENT ROOM & Of F ICE. . . . . 1044 SQ. fT. @ $15 - $ 6,660
<br /> TOTAL ENTIRE Bu I L 0 I NG. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9173 SQ. fT. @ $15 - $128,595
<br /> -
<br />
<br />IN STUDYING THIS SUGGESTED ALTERNATE fOR THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AT MAHLON
<br />SWEET AIRPORT IT WAS BROUGHT OUT, T~AT THIS WAS THE BEST LOC_TION FOR TH€SE FACILITIES
<br />AS I! WOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SIDE Of THE fiELD OPPOSITE THE CENTER Of THE MAIN RUN-
<br />WAYS AffORDI NG BETTER FACI LrTI ES fOR CONTRO'L TOWER' OPERATIONS'. THE NEED fOR A CONTROL
<br />TOWER ~AS BROUGHT OUT WITH THE POSSIBILITY THAT ALL LIGHT AIRCRAfT OPERATIONS AS WELL
<br />AS SCHEDULED OPERATIONS COULD BE OPERATED AT MAHLON SWEET AIRPORT If THEY WERE PROPERLY
<br />CONT!WLLED.
<br />
<br />UNDER THE ABOVE PRELIMINARY COSTS IT IS ESTIMATED THAT THE BASIC BID fURNISHING
<br />fAClllTl'ES fOR WEAT~ER BUREAU, C.A.A., WlTH UTILITIES, RtST ROOMS, ETC. WOULD COST
<br />$64,635. UNDER THE 56~44% BASIS TH~ CITY OF EUGENE'S SHARE OF THIS WOULD BE $28,439.40.
<br />If ALTERNATE #4 INCLUDING CONTROL TOWER, EQUIPMENT ROOM AND OffICE:~WERE ADDED, TOTAL
<br />ESTIMATE~ COSTS WOULD BE $71,295 WITH THE CITY'S SHARE, $31,413.80.
<br />
<br />IT WAS RECOMMENDED BY THE COMMITTEE THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE' THIS PROPOSED
<br />, - ,
<br />A,IR-TERMINAL BUILDING TO BE LOCATED UPON THE EAST SlOE OF THE fiELD AND AUTHORIZE THE
<br />ARCHITECT TO PREPARE DETAILED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS fOR BID CALLS EARLY IN JUNE,
<br />1952. THE INITI,AL BID CALL UNDER THIS RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE FOR THE BASIC BID
<br />AFfORD1NG 1150 SQUARE fEET fOR WEATHER BUREA~; 1~44 SQUARE FEET-fOR C.A.A.i AND 1850
<br />SQUARE fEET FOR REST ROOMS, UTILITIES, STAIRS AND CORRIDORS TOTALING 4,309 SQUARE
<br />fEET AT AN ESTIMATED COST OF $64,635 WITH AN ALTERNATE BID REQUIRED TO I~CLUDE
<br />CONTROL TOWER, EQUIPMENT ROOM AND OffiCE, TOTALING 1,044 SQUARE fEET ESTIMATED AT
<br />$6,660,TOTALING $71,295. THIS RECOMMENDATION WAS MADE WITH THE HOPE THAT THE CITY
<br />WILL BE ABLE TO MATCH FEDERAL FUNDS IN THE NECESSARY AMOUNT TO INCLUDE THE CONTROL TOWER
<br />, I "
<br />AS WELL AS fACILITIES AS OUTLINED ABOVE."
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY GODLOVE, SECONDED BY WATSON THAT THE REPORT Of THE COMMITTEE BE
<br />ADO~TED.RoLLCALL 'VOTE. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
<br />
<br />9
<br />
<br />A REPORT Of THE BOARD OF ApPEALS WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: RE: REQUESTS Of
<br />RAY HAWK; E. VAN TASSEL; REV. WALTER L. Huss, AND D. DION.
<br />
<br />"THE BOARD OF ApPEALS HELD A MEETI NG AT THE CI TY HALL, APRI L 10, 1952 TO
<br />CONSIDER THE fO~LQWING REQUESTS FOR VARIANCES fROM THE ZONING ORDINANCE. MEMBERS
<br />PRESENT WERE MR~ J~HN LUVAAS, MR. SAM MORRIS, MR. CHARLES GILLILAN AND MR. ADRIAN
<br />VA.ALER~
<br />
<br />.,
<br />
<br />,:'1',
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />i
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />'I
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />I!
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />i
<br />)
<br />I
<br />I
<br />,
<br />,
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
|