10/13/1952 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~216 e I REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS I 6 A REPORT.'OF BOARD OF ApPEALS - RE: VARIANCES IRONSj DENBROEDERj PETERSON, SIMS I THE FOR WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: I "THE il BOARD OF ApPEALS HELD A MEETING AT THE CITY HALL, OCTOBER 9, 1952,.TO CONSIDER ! THE FOLLOWING REQUESTS FOR VARIANCES OF SETBACKS AND AREA REQUIREMENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE i ZONING ORDINANCE. MEMBERS PRESENT WERE JOHN LUVAAS, SAM MORRIS, ADRIAN VAALER, ROBERT I. WI LMSEN, AND CHARLES GILLILAN. I: . ' II DR. CHARLES IRONS 2810 ELINOR STREET I' I. OF STARTED A STRUCTURE WITHOUT BENEFIT OF ,: THIS :. PERMIT OR SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. STRUCTURE WAS CONSTRUCTED TO THE SIDEWALK LINE I AND CONSISTED OF A ROOF OVER A DRIVEWAY ACCESSIBLE FROM 28TH AVENUE. THIS STRUCTURE IS II PURPORTED TO BE A COMBINATION OF CARPORT AND SUN DECK. " I , As A CARPORT THE SETBACK REQUIREMENT IS 20 FEET AND,AS A SUN DECK THE STRUCTURE I WOULD BE REQUIRED TO SET BACK TEN FEET. THE BOARD GRANTED A WAIVER OF TEN FEET OF THE e REQUIRED TWENTY FEET, CONSIDERING THE STRUCTURE A CARPORT. THIS IS IN THE R-I, SINGLE Ii FAMILY ZONE. II Ii 2. MR. GEORGE DENBROEDER OF 815 EAST 28TH AVENUE REQUESTS A WAIVER OF THE TWENTY FOOT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING A CARPORT IN CONJUNCTION WITH HIS GARAGE AND BREEZEWAY. . I I SINCE TEN FOOT EXTENSION OF SAID CARPORT WOULD NOT PROJECT BEYOND THE HOUSE LINE, THE BOARD GRANTED A WAIVER OF TEN FEET OF THE REQUIRED SETBACK. THIS PROPERTY IS IN 'I THE R-I .SI NGLE FAMILY ZONE. I. . !I I 3. MR. MARIUS PETERSON WHO OWNS LOTS 9, 10 AND 20 FEET OF LOT I I , BLOCK 18 I N THE II FRASIER & HYLAND ADDITION 27TH AVENUE WEST AND OLIVE.STREETS, .1 LOCATED ON THE CORNER OF II REQUESTS.PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT TW 0 RES IDE NT I A. L UNITS BY DIVIDING THE LOTS TO GIVE jl FRONTAGE ON 27TH AVENUE. " THESE LOTS WERE SUBDIVIDED IN UNITS OF 25 FOOT FRONTAGE AND AS SUCH, THE ORDINANCE II WOULD PERt", I T A RESIDENCE TO.BE CONSTRUCTED ON EACH PARCEL. SI NCE THE RE-SUBDIVISION " OF 5,250.SQUARE ., WOULD CREATE TWO LOTS FEET EACH A.ND REMOVE THE POSSIBILITY OF CROWDING , THE PROPERTY, HiE BOARD GRANTED THE REQUEST. THIS PROPERTY IS IN THE R-I SINGLE.FAMILY II ZONE.. II . I II 4. MR. GLENN E. SIMS OF 742 JEFFERSON STREET REQUESTS A WAIVER OF THE SEVEN FOOT :i SETBACK FROM ALLEY FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING A CARPORT AT THE REAR OF HIS RE,SIDENCE. II 'I THIS LOT IS 45 BY 66-2/3.FEET 3,000 THE q FEET AND CONTAINS SQUARE FEET. EXISTI NG I. DUPLEX RESIDENCE ,IS 37 BY 42 FEET AND CONTAINS 1554 SQUARE FEET. THE CARPORT WILL HAVE I' 240 SQUARE FEET OR A TOTA.L OF 1794 SQUARE FEET WHICH DOES NOT EXCEED.THE 60% C 0 V ERA. G E ,I ALLOWED BY ORDINANCE. Ii THE BOARD REQUESTED MR. SIMS TO PRESENT A PLOT PLAN OF HIS PROPERTY SHOWING LOCATION I' I OF DUPLEX AND PROPOSED CA.RPORT AND IF, IT IS SHOW N A HARDSHIP EXISTS, THE BUILDING INSPECTOR il WAS AUTHORIZED TO GRANT THE WAIVER. MR. SIMS HAS PRESENTED A SKETCH AS REQUESTED AND IT !I WOULD BE POSSIBLE FOR MR. SIMS..TO MAINTAIN A THREE F-OOT SETBACK FOR SA.ID CARP-ORT, AN.Y GREATER!I SETBACK WOULD PUT THE CAR PORT I N FRONT OF BEDROOM WI NDOWS. THEREFORE, I TIS RECOMMENDED ,: THAT MR. SI MS BE .PERMI TTED TO CONSTRUCT HI S CARPORT ON THE THREE FOOT SETBACK WHI CH It/OULD II I :1 WAIVE FOUR FEET OF THE REQUIRED SETBACK., I TbiERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, MEETING WAS ADJOURNED. " II I II e . Ii I TWAS MOVED BY CRUMBAKER, SECONDE~ BY BOOTH THAT THE REPORT OF THE BOARD OF Apl?EALS BE ADOPTED. Mo T 1,0 N CAR R lED. I' II 7 A REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION - RE: REZONING JOHNSONj ELAINE GET.TY & MARTHA SELANDERj I EARL E. WARE, CHARLES BOYD AND JOHN C. BINTZj STENWI CK & KOKj F. K. BREWERj AND RALPH B. LAKE WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS.FOLLOWS: , "As A PERMANENT~EPORT, PURSUANT TO THE RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY ,I OF EUGENE, DIRECT1'NG THE CITy.PLANNING COMMISSION TO PREPARE A REPORT UPON CERTAIN REQUESTS II FOR RECLASSIFICATION OF ZONING IN AREAS WITHIN SAID CITY, T.HE CI TY P.LANNI NG COMMISSION HEREBY ADOPTS AS ITS REPORT, THE FOLLOWING: , I - THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR RECLASSI FI CA.TI ON OF ZONING OF PROPERTY IN THE C I, TY BE APPROVED: R. B. JOHNSON I THA.T PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY NOT CURRENTLY ZONED C-3 CENTRAL BUSINESS: e ~