My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/12/1953 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1953
>
01/12/1953 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 1:49:30 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 3:22:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/12/1953
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />r'2'7 6 ' <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />"THE BOARD OF ApPEALS HELD A MEETING JANUARY 8, 1953 AT THE CITY HALL TO CONSIDER <br />THE FOLLOWING REQUESTS fOR SETBACK, AND CONSTRUCTION VARIANCES'fROM THE ZONING ORDINANCE. <br /> <br />'/ <br /> <br />I. THE REVEREND WENDELL HAWLEY, PASTOR or THE FREE,'METHODIST CHURCH or EUGENE, HAS <br />REQUESTED WAIVER OF THE 50 FOOT INSIDE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION or A <br />CHURCH. THE PRO~OSED STR~CTURE IS TO BE BUILT AT'THE NbRTHtAST'CORNER OF 18T~ A~EN~E <br />AND POLK STREET ON TWO LOTS WHOSE PERIMETER DIMENSI'ON,S ARt f.22.6 FEET BY 133.46 FEEt. <br />IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE THIS STRUCTURE, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO WAIVE'-THE fRONTAGE <br />SETBACKS AS WELL AS THE INTERIOR REQUIREMENTS. <br /> <br />Si~CE 18TH AVENUE AND POLK S~REET ARE DESI~~ATED AS A~TE~IALS, THERE IS ~ SPE:f~~L <br />FRONTAGE SETBACK REQUIREO:OF 56 FEET FROM-THE CENTER LINES 6t SAID STREETS FOR FUTURE <br />WIDENING.' 'THEREFORE, T~E SETBACK ON 18t~ AVENUE wotiL6~E "21 FEET AND ON POLK StREET <br />IT wouuj BE 23 FEET. -IF THESE SETBACKS ARE MAI'NTA'I'NED, THE REQUIRED INTERI'OR 50 FOOT <br />SETBAC~'WOULD BE' REDUCED AS FOL(~WS: <br /> <br />29.6 FEET ON THE EAST S~OE. <br />34.6 FEET ON THE NORTH'SIDE. <br /> <br />, ~ <br /> <br />THE BOARD FELT THAT BY REDUCING THIS YARD AREA, THE INTENT OF THE ORDINANCE WO~LD <br />BE DEFEATED AS APPLIED TO OFF-STREET PARKING AND fURTHER, THE INTERSECTION IN QUESTION <br />IS 'ND W)LL BE HEAVI(Y TRAVE(LED AND 'FOR ~HIS RE~SON, tHE BOARD WAS RELUCTANT TO REDUCE <br />A LARGE PERCENTAGE OF THE INTERIOR AREA WHICH IS REQUIRED 'FOR 'OFF-STREET PARKI~G. <br /> <br />THEREfORE, THE BOARD DENIED THIS REQUEST WITH THE RECOMMENDATION THAT FURTHER <br />STUDY BE GIVEN THIS PROJECT AND ADDITIONAL LAND BE SECURED; <br /> <br />2~ MRS. C. M. REESE Of" 1680 Moss STREET HAS REQUESTED PERMISSION TO ADD A BATHROOM <br />TO HER ~~'STING APARTMENT -HOUSE. <br /> <br />THE APARTMENT HOUSE IN QUESTION IS A NON-CONFORMING OCCUPANCY AND AS SUCH, IT <br />CANNOT BE ENLARGED. <br /> <br />SINCE THIS ROOM IS TO' BE ADDED TO THE SOUTH SI:DE OF THE EXISTING 'STRUCTURE, AND <br />CONSTITUTES A SECOND STORY' ADDITION, BEING BUILT :ATOP AN' EXISTING UTILITY ROOM, THE <br />BOARD IN ITS INTERPRETATION OF THE ORDINANCE; DECIDED IT WAS A MATTER OF LAND USE AND <br />NOT WITHIN ITS JURISDICTION TO GRANT THE WAIVER OF EXPANDING THE NON-CONFORMING OCCUPANCY. <br /> <br />THEY THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THE CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER THIS REQUEST AND DECIDE WHETHER <br />MRS~ REESE BE ALLOWED TO EXPAND HER BUILDING. <br /> <br />THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, MEETING WAS ADJOURNED." <br /> <br />THE REPORT OF THE BOARD OF ApPEALS WAS REFERR80 BY MAYOR JOHNSON TO THE PUBLIC WORKS <br />COMMI TTEE. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />A PERMANENT REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION - RE: REQUESTED REZONING FOR GUSKE BROS.; <br />W. I REES; W.' C. LANDON; MI L TON -JAcks'ON, AND PAUL CAMPBEL'L~ FRANC I SEVERSON" MI L TON JACKSON <br />PROPERTIES WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />",' "As A PERMANENT REPORT, PURSUAN,T TO THE RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCI L or THE <br />alTY ot EUGENE, DIRECTING THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSIO~ ~O PREPARE A REPORT UPON CERTAIN <br />REQUESTS FOR REtLAS~IFICATIO~'bt'z6NING IN AREAS WiTHIN SAID CITY AND AMENDMENTS T6 THE <br />COMPREHENSIVE ZONIN'G OR'oINANCE, ORDINANC"r #918~, THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION HEREBY <br />ADOPTED AS ITS REPORT, THE FOLLOWING: <br /> <br />THE PLANNING COMMISS10N RECOMMENDS THAT THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION <br />OF ZONING OF PROPERTY IN THE CiTY-BE APPROVED: <br /> <br />GUSKE BROTHERS <br />LOTS 7,8 AND 9, eLOCK9 DRIVERTON ADDITION, NORTHEAST CORNER 1'9TH AVE" PATTERSON <br />STREET ' <br />REQUESTED CHA~GE FROM R-3 MULTIP(E'FAMILY RESIDENTIA( TO C-I~LIM1~ED COMMERCIAL' <br />DISTRICT <br /> <br />AN'o THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT THE FOLLOWING PET-ITIONS FOR RECLASSIFICATION: <br />Of ZONING OF PROPERTY IN THE CITY BE DENIED: <br /> <br />W.- I. REES <br />LOT 4 AND THE EAST 110 fEET OF LOTS 5 AND-6 IN eLOCK 8; DRIVERTON'S ADDITION, BEING <br />THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH AVENUE AND PATTERSON STREET. <br />REQUESTED CHANGE FROM R-3 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO C-I LIMITED COMMERCIAL <br />DISTRICT. <br /> <br />GUSKE BROTHERS <br />LOTS 8, 9, 17 AND 18 BLOCK 4, FRIENDLY ADDITION. WEST SIDE OF FRIENDLY STREET <br />BETWEEN 18TH PLACE AND 19TH AVENUE <br />REQUESTED CHANGE FROM RA OUTER RESIDENTIAL TO C-I LIMITED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />,I <br />II <br />II <br />I, <br />Ii <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />I' <br />~ 1 <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I! <br />'I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Ii <br />I' <br />:1 <br />II <br />ii <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />ii <br />ii <br />II <br />:1 <br />II <br />il <br />ii <br />II <br />~ I <br />" <br />ii <br />I' <br />II <br />I, <br />I' <br />i' <br />II <br />It <br />I' <br />II <br />" <br /> <br />Ii <br /> <br />,i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />il <br />, <br />I <br />!I <br />'[ <br />II <br />Ii <br />I' <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />-. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.