My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/28/1954 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1954
>
06/28/1954 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2007 2:02:15 AM
Creation date
11/2/2006 3:25:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/28/1954
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> rl0)n <br /> -< \ J <br /> ,C} _ <br /> e <br /> , <br /> I <br /> "THE CITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CONTINUE TO MOVE ALONG ACCORDING TO SCHEDULE. ON I I <br /> 17TH AVENUE fROM AGATE TO FAIRMOUNT BOULEVARD, ALL CURB AND GUTTERS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED ,I <br /> AND THE B~SE ROCK IS BEING PLACED ON THE SUB-BASE. THE 18TH AVENUE - WASHINGTON TO <br /> CHARNELTON" CUT-THROUGH IS NOW BEING EXCAVATED IN PREPARATION fOR THE SUB-BASE ROCK, CURB I' <br /> AND GUTTERS. ON VAN BUREN STREET BETWEEN 21ST AND 22ND AVENUE, THE CURB AND GUTTERS ARE Ii <br /> IN AND ON DONALD STREET, PEARL STREET TO 37TH AVENUE, THE CURB AND GUTTERS ARE 80% COM- II <br /> PLETED. THE OAK GROVE SEWER IS APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALf fiNISHED. <br /> I, <br /> 'I <br /> II <br /> i DURING THE LAST 30 DAYS, THE fOLLOWING" PROJECTS HAVE BEEN 99% OR MORE COMPLETED: i <br /> I Ii <br /> i <br /> PAVING IN THE ALLEY BETWEEN 12TH & 13TH - HILYARD TO ALDER STREET. I ~ <br /> I ALL ALLEYS IN THE BLOCK BOUNDED BY 7TH & 8TH AVENUES, PEARL TO HIGH STREET. . <br /> PAVING ON 21ST AVENUE fROM POTTER TO UNIVERSITY & EMERALD TO AGATE STREET. <br /> SANITARY SEWER ON 30TH AVENUE BETWEEN PORTLAND & OLIVE STREET. <br /> I AM IN RECEIPT Of SOME INTERESTING NEWSPAPER ARTICLES ON STREET WIDENING, ASPHALT <br /> PLANT OPERATI ON AN'D REZONI NG IN THE CITY Of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, fORWARDED BY V. E. <br /> JOHNSON, THE MAYOR; ALSO, WE' HAVE HAD SEVERAL INTERESTING POSTAL CARDS fROM DR. CRUMBAKER, e <br /> PRESIDENT Of THE COUNCIL. <br /> SENATOR Gu~ CbRDON HAS, ADVISED ME THAT THE AMAZON CREEK MODifiED PROJECT REPORT <br /> CLEARED THE BUREAU Of THE BUDGET ON JUNE 17TH AND WAS BEING RETURNED TO THE DEPARTMENT <br /> Of THE ARMY fOR SUBMISSION TO THE CONGRESS AND PROMISES TO SEE THAT IT IS SENT UP <br /> WITHOUT DELAY AND IN. TIME TO' BE CONSIDERED fOR INCLUSION" IN THE OMNIBUS AUTHORIZATION <br /> BILL. 1\ I: <br /> I <br /> " <br /> " ON ORDER Of THE MAYOR, THE REPORT Of THE CITY MANAGER WAS RECEIVED AND PLACED ON fiLE. <br /> REPORTS OF COMMITTEES <br /> I <br /> , <br /> 4 I A REPORT Of THE PUBLIC SAfETY COMMITTEE - RE: ApPLICATIONS fOR PACKAGE STORE, CLASS A <br /> 1 <br /> I LIQUOR LICENSES WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS fOLLOWS: <br /> i <br /> I I <br /> I "PRESENT: ACTING MAYOR'CRUMBAKER, COUNCILMEN GODLOVE AND SIEGENTHALER; CITY I' <br /> I ii <br /> I MANAGER AND CITY RECORDER. . . <br /> : I <br /> :1 <br /> THE PUBLIC SA~ETY COMMITTEE MET ON JUNE 18, 1954 TO CONSIDER TWO APPLICATIONS fOR ~"' <br /> PACKAGE STORE LIQUOR LICENSES. THE RECOMMENDATIONS ARE AS fOLLOWS: . <br /> I . PACKAGE STORE, CLASS "A" LICENSE, WILLIAM A. AND THELMA H. KERNUTT - THIS APPLICA- <br /> TION WAS DISCUSSED AGAIN. MR. STANLEY DARLING WAS HEARD IN BEHALf or MR. KERNUTT'S <br /> , APPLI CATION. SINCE THREE LETTERS ARE ON fiLE PROTESTING' THE GRANTING Of THIS LICENSE, <br /> Ii <br /> IT IS THE FEELING Of THE COMMITTEE THAT THE APPLICATION SHOULD BE HELD I NTH E Pu B L I C <br /> SAfETY fiLE fOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION. . <br /> , <br /> 2. PACKAGE STORE, CLASS "A" LICENSE, DONALD E. AND DEELLA MARIE WILSON - THIS APPLICA- <br /> TION, IT WAS NOTED, HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED BY THE CHIEf OF POLICE. THE REPORT Of INVES- <br /> TIGATION BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WAS READ AND DISCUSSED AND IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION <br /> Of THE COMMITTEE THAT THIS LICENSE ALSO BE RETAINED IN THE COMMITTEE fOR fURTHER STUDY." I <br /> IT WAS MOVED BY SIEGENTHALER, SECONDED BY GODLOVE THAT THE REPORT Of THE PUBLIC SAFETY <br /> COMMITTEE,BE'ADOPTED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> 5 A REPORT Of THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING HELD JUNE 23, 1954 - RE: TRAffiC ITEMS <br /> AND VARIANCE REQUEST..TO SIGN CODE WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS fOLLOWS: <br /> ."PRESENT: COUNCILMEN SIEGENTHALER AND CONE; CITY MANAGER; CITY TRAffiC ENGINEER e <br /> AND CITY RECORDER. THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MET ON JUNE 23RD TO INVESTIGATE A <br /> NUMBER Of TRAffiC ITEMS AND A REQUEST fOR A VARIANCE fROM THE SIGN CODE. THE AGENDA I NCLUD- <br /> ED THE fOLLOWING: <br /> , <br /> SIGN VARIANCE - UNIVERSITY ARMS APARTMENT HOTEL - THE LETTER REQUEST Of HUSBAND, FORT . , <br /> I . <br /> AND JOHNSON IN BEHALf Of UNIVERSITY ARMS WAS READ AND DISCUSSED. THE COMMITTEE I NVESTI- <br /> GATED FURTHER BY INSPECTING THE PREMISES AND THE INTERSECTION OF 11TH AND FERRY TO <br /> DETERMINE THE EfFECT OF THE SIGN INSTALLATIONS REQUESTED. <br /> . <br /> THE'COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE COUNCIL THAT THE VARIANCE BE GRANTED TO ERECT THE <br /> SIGN DESCRIBED ON TOP or THE BUILDING AT 1040 FERRY STREET PROVIDED OTHER RtQUIREMENTS <br /> fOR CONSTRUCTION ARE COMPLIED WITH. <br /> 1 IN CONNECTION WITH THE OTHER PART OF THE REQUEST WHICH IS fOR A DIRECTIONAL NEON <br /> SIGN ON ONE O. THE FOUR INTERSECTIONS Of II TH AND FERRY, IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE <br /> COMMITTEE THAT MORE SPECifiC I NFORMATI ON BE FURNI SHED SO' THAT THE COMMI TTEE AND TflE I <br /> COUNCIL MAY PASS JUDGMENT ON THE REQUEST. FOR INSTANCE, THE COMMITTEE WOULD LIKE TO <br /> KNOW EXACTLY WHERE IT IS PLANNED TO INSTALL THE SIGN, AND WHETHER IT IS THE PLAN TO HAVE <br /> I IT PROJECT OUT OVER THE SIDEWALK. IN OTHER WORDS, IT IS NECESSARY TO KNOW EXACTLY WHERE <br /> I <br /> IT IS PLANNED '(0 INSTALL THE SIGN, AND WHETHER IT IS THE PLAN TO HAVE IT PROJECT OUT OVER <br /> THE SIDEWALK. IN OTHER WORDS, IT IS NECESSARY TO KNOW EXACTLY WHERE THE SIGN IS TO BE <br /> AND HOW IT IS TO BE PLACED BEFORE IT CAN BE CONSIDERED rOR APPROVAL. ANOTHER ITEM or Ii <br /> IMPORTANCE IS THE NATURE O. THE SUPPORT FOR THE SIGN. Is IT A SOLID STRUCTURE O. THREE <br /> fEET IN WIDTH, OR IS IT A FRAME STRUCTURE WHICH WOULD PROVIDE FOR PROPER VISION AT THAT <br /> INTERSECTION'? e <br /> I - <br /> ~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.