|
<br />r178
<br />I e
<br /> -
<br />~~----- -._- ------- --- ---- -- ------- -----
<br /> 0-' _".- -.--------=--.-.~.-..-- ---.-_"-~--=------::-- ----- -- --:0-..,---,-- -=--_-:-.-_~-,---.--:-.~-..,.._~-~-___+~__,__--____,._- -_~ ____..____ - ~ -- -- - - -------
<br /> ..L. __ __ .
<br /> ---- - - ---~ ~ _ __ __ 4_
<br /> REPORTS Ot COMMITTEES II
<br /> . II I
<br />4 ,A REPORT OF THE .PUBLI C SAFETY COMMI,TTEE MEETI NG HELD ON JULY 28, 1954 - RE: BEER
<br /> LICENSE AND DISPENSER'S LICENSE APPLICATIONS FOR tOO'S, CAMPUS ,COFFEE SHOP AND ~ONES' tiNE II
<br /> tOODS WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: il
<br /> "PRESENT: COUNCILMEN CRUMBAKER, BOOTH, KOPPE, SIEGENTHALER, WATSON AND CONE; CITY II
<br /> MANAGER} CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY RECORDER. THE COMMITTEE MET ON JULY 28, 1954 TO CON- il
<br /> SIDER THREE APPLICATIONS FOR LIQUOR LICENSES. II
<br /> I . ,REQUEST 'FO~<;LASS "B" DISPENSf;,R'S LICENSE FOR FOO'S,764 WILLAMETTE STREET. THE 11
<br /> COMMITTEE DISCUSSED THIS REQUEST FOR GREATER PRIVILEGt BUT FELT THAT MORE I NF'ORMATI ON Ii
<br /> WAS NEEDED AND THEREFORE RECOMMENDS THAT THE AP~LICATION,BE RETAINED FOR FURTHER I N- ,I
<br /> VESTIGATION. II
<br /> I,
<br /> 'I
<br /> REQUEST FOR ~ PACKAGE STORE, CLASS A LICENSE - CAMPUS COFFEE SHOP, I,
<br /> 2. 894 EAST 13TH 'I
<br /> , . II
<br /> AVENUE. IT 1$ THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE THAT THE COUNCIL NOT
<br /> ENDORSE THE APPLICATION. "
<br /> . . ! e
<br /> 3. REQUEST FOR A RETAIL MALT BEVERAGE, CLASS B LICENSE - JONES' tiNE tOODS, q
<br /> 47 - , OTH II
<br /> . l'
<br /> AVENUE EAST - THECOMMITrEE NOTED THAT THIS APPLI~ATION ONLY ,INVOLVES A CHANGE OF OWNER- "
<br /> SHIP FROM LUCILLE PETERS JONES TO ROBERT ~. AN6 RUTH ANN SNEDDON FOR THE SAME TYPE .OF :1
<br /> "
<br /> LICENSE. I
<br /> 'I
<br /> I
<br /> IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION THAT THE COUNCIL GIVE APPROVAL BY ENDORSING THE APPLI~ ,I
<br /> CATION." I
<br /> . ,
<br /> I .. .. .
<br /> I IT, WAS MOVED BY MR. SIEGENTHALER, SECONDED BY MR. OWEN THAT THE REPORT OF THE PUBLIC "
<br /> SAFETY COMMITT~E BE ADOPTED. ,MOTION CARRIED. I,
<br /> I:
<br /> ,
<br />5 ' I A REPORT OF THE PUBLIC WORKS AND PUBLIC SAFETY ,COMMITTEES MEETI~G ~ELD ON AUGUS~ 4TH - Ii
<br /> I,
<br /> RE: REMOVAL OF DIVIDERS ON VILLARD; AUGUSTA STREET SEWER ASSESSMENT AND APPLICATION FOR Ii
<br /> SEGREGATION OF ASSESSMENT LIEN WAS SUBMITTEDAND'READ AS FOLLOWS: "
<br /> I!
<br /> ::
<br /> \ : "PRESENT: MAYOR JOHNSON; COUNCILME~ CRUMBAK~R, GODLOVE, KOPPE AND SIEGENTHALER; :1
<br /> I'
<br /> CITY MANAGER; CITY ATTORNEY; TRAFFIC ENGINEER AND THE CITY RECORDER. THE PUBLIC WORKS i:
<br /> 'I
<br /> . ,AND PUBLIC SAFETy.,COMMITTEES MADE A FIELD TRIP ON AUGUST 4TH AND MET AT NOO,N, FOLLOWING .'
<br /> THE. TRIP; TO 01 S.CUSS .VARI OUS MATTERS .AND FORMULATE RECOMMEt.lDATIONS. TO THE COUNCI L.
<br /> ACTION WAS TAKEN ON THE YOLLOWING THREE ITEMS: .
<br /> I . PE:T I: TI ON FOR REMOVAL OF' LANDSCAPED 0 I V I DERS ON. V I LLARD STREET' - BETWEEN tRANKL IN
<br /> I , BOULEVARD AND tAl RMOUNT BOULEVAR.D -, THE PETI TlON REQUESllNG REMOVAL OF THE LANDSC'APED
<br /> I
<br /> CENTER STRIP ON VI~LAR~ STREET AND PAVING OF THE CENTER STRIP WAS REFERRED TO .THE
<br /> PUBLIC WORKS AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEES. ALSO REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEES WERE
<br /> PETI TI ONS OBJECTING TO THE REMOVAL; 'OF THE CENT~R STRI PAND THE PAVI NG. THE REPORT
<br /> OF THE CI TY ENGI NEER. INDI CATED .THAT THE PETl,Tl ONS FAVOR I NG THE PROJECT REPRESENTED
<br /> i . APPROXI MATEL Y 11%10". THE' TOTAL rOOTI\GE ANDTIfE PETI TI ONS .OBJECTI NG TO THE PRQJECT
<br /> REPRESENTED ABQUT 43%. THE OWNERSHIP QF 46% OF THE FOOTAGE DID ~OT INDICATE THEIR
<br /> PREFERENCE. I
<br /> THE COMMI TTEES VI Ell/ED VI.LLARD STREET aETWEEN tRANKL'1 N BOULEVARD AND fAI RMOUNT '!
<br /> BOULEVARD AND DISCUSSE~ THE PEtiTIONS, TAK~NG INTO. ACCOUNT THE TABULATION PREPARED BY ;i
<br /> I
<br /> THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENt. IT IS THE 'RECOMMENDATIQN OF THE COMMITTEES THAT THE I
<br />I
<br /> i CQUNCIL DELAY ANY ACTIQN ON THE PROPQSED PROJECT.
<br />! AUGUSTA STREET SEWER ASSES5MENT- THE 'PROBLEM Q,F' LEVYI NG AN ASSESSMENT FOR A
<br />, 2..
<br />I SANI TARY SEW,ER AGAI NSTA PORTI ON OF THE PROPERTY BET\~EEN AUGUSTA STREET AND THE EAST
<br />I I'
<br /> CITY LIMITS WAS RELATED ay THE CITY MANAGER AND THE CITY ENGINEER. THE PROPERTY IN " e
<br /> II
<br /> QUESTION IS THE .I~C .FE~T DIREC~LY WEST OF THE EAST CITY LIMITS WHICH IS NOT AND WILL I,
<br /> I!
<br /> , NOT BE FpR SOME TIME 'IN A POSitiON TO. BENEFIT FROM THE SEWER. il
<br />! ." ~\ i:
<br /> ,
<br /> , AFTER ,SOME 01 SCU.SSI ON, IT IS THE .RECOMMENDATION or.THE PUBLI~ WORKS COMMITTEE "
<br />; ![
<br /> , THAT THE PRQP.ERTY IN QUESTI ON E!E ASSEsSED I N THE REGULAR MANNER; THAT THE OWNERSHI P
<br /> OF THESE :PR.OPERT I E,S BE NOli F I ED I N THE REGULI\R MANNER, BUT THAT SPECIAL CONSIDERATION
<br /> BE GIVEN BY THE COUNCIL TO. T.HIS PRQPERTY IF THE ASSESSMENT REMAINS UNPAID AT THE DATE
<br /> OF MATURITY OF THE DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT WARRANTS ISSUED ON THE PROJECT.
<br />, .
<br />I 3. ApPLICATION rOR SEGREGATIQN OF ASSESSMENT LIEN - THE PUBLIC WORKS CCMMITTEE CCN-
<br />, .
<br />I SIDERE.D AN :APPLI:CATION FORSEGREGATI ON QF AN ASSESSMENT LI EN 51 GNED BY DOLLY OMU D.
<br />I THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IS ON THE EAST SIDE OF HILYARD STREET BETWEEN 30TH AND 32ND AVENUES.
<br />,
<br /> IT IS THE DEsIRE'qr THE OMLIDS: TQ SELL OFF A PIECE ,ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 32ND
<br />! AND HILYARD STREETj OIMENSIONS 331' X 246', AND PAY UP THE COMPLETE ASSESSMENT ON THAT
<br />, PQRTI ON. .THI S P.RQPERTY IS VACANT LAND ~ITH NO. :IMPROVEMENTS QN IT. THE BALANCE OF THE
<br />I I
<br />I ASSESSMENT WH'I CH WOULD REMA IN WOULD BE APPROXI MATEL,Y $1,0.0.0.0.0 WHI CH WOULD BE SECURED Ii
<br />!
<br /> I BY THE BALANCE OF THE PRQPERTY, A LARGER TRACT, WITH A SERVICE STATION LQCATED ON IT.
<br /> I IT IS THE RECOMMENDATI~N OF THE RUBLIC WORKS ,COMMITTEE THAT .THE SEGREGATION BE
<br /> ,
<br /> ALLOWED." . .
<br /> e
<br />~
<br />
|