Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 179~ <br />e <br /> - --~ - - --~--- <br />-- ~_.- IT - , - - -------------- ---~------ -- ----- -" r~ <br /> I, <br /> d <br /> I! IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SIEGENTHALER, SECONDED BY MR. OWEN THAT ITEM No. 3 REGARDING TtiE <br />I i! <br /> !i APPROVAL FOR SEGREGATION OF ASSESSMENT BE SEGREGATED FROM THE REPORT. MOTl ON CARR I ED. <br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR~ SIEGENTHALER, SECONDED BY MR. OWEN J'HAT THE APPLI CATI ON BE REFERRED <br /> TO THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE AND THAT THE BALANCE OF THE REPORT BE ADOPTED. MOTlpN CARR I ED. <br />6 A REPORT OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 6, 1954 - RE: ApPLICATIONS <br /> FOR LIQUOR LICENSES; SIGN VARIANCE FOR UNIVERSITY ARMS; CONTRACT WITH STATE ON TRAFFIC SIGNALS; <br /> VARIOUS TRAfFIC REGUL,ATIONS WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: <br /> . .. <br /> "PRESENT:, MAYOR JOHNSQN; COUNC I LMEN SI EGENTHALER, GODLOVE AND CONE; CI TY MANAGER; <br /> CI TY ATTORNEr; TRAFF'I,C ENGI NEER AND THE CI TV RECORDER.. . <br /> . <br /> THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MET ON AUGUST 6, 1954 TO GIVE CONSIDERATION AND FORMU- <br /> LATE RECOMMENDATIONS ON VARIOUS MATTERS REFERRED TO IT. THE PUBLIC SAFETY MATTERS <br /> STUDIED WERE AS FOLLOWS: <br />e I . ApPLICATION FOR A PACKAGE STORE, CLASS A. LICENSE, EAST BROADWAY MARKET, 125 EAST <br /> BROADWAY - THE COMMITTEE WAS INFORMED THAT THIS APPLICATION FOR A PACKA9E STORE, CLASS i <br /> I <br /> A LICENSE WAS MADE NECESSARY BECAUSE OF THE CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP. THE NAME OF THE APPLI- , <br /> CANT IS JOHN SAMELUK, DBA EAST BROADWAY MARKET, 125 EAST BROADWAY, FORMERLY DOING <br /> BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME OF MCKAY'S MARKET. THE COMMI TTEE WAS I NfORMED THAT THE LI CENSE <br /> REQUESTED IS THE SAME TYPE OF LICENSE THAT WAS FORMERLY ISSUED TO MCKAY'S MARKET. IT <br /> IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE THAT THE COUNCIL GIVE APPROVAL <br />I TO THIS LICENSE APPLICATIO~. <br /> ,2. ApPLICATION fOR A CLASS B DISPENSER'S LICENSE FOR FOO'$, 764 WILLAMETTE STREEJ _ <br /> i! THE COMMITTEE.rURTHER INVESTIGATED THIS LfcENSE A~PLICATION AND WAS INFO~MED BY THE <br /> :, CITY MANAGER THAT.rHE APPLICANTS DESIRE THIS GREATER PRIVILEGE LICENSE TO PERMIT THE <br /> I <br /> Ii USE OF AN ORGAN OR,PIANO TO PROVIDE ENTERTAINMENT FOR ITS PATROt'S. AFTER SOME FURTHER <br /> " <br /> :, DISCUS~ION, THE COMMITTEE FELT THAT THE APPLICATION SHOULD BE APPROVED AND ~HERt~ORE <br /> RECOMMENDS THAT THE COUNCIL GIVE APPROVAL TO THE ENDORSEMENT OF THIS APPLICATION. <br /> 3. REQUEST OF ,UNIVERSITY ARMS APARTMENTS FOR ,A SIGN VARIANCE - THE COMMITTE.E fURTHER <br /> ,CONSIDERED THISRE9UEST.FOR A SIGN INSTALLATION IN THE LOT ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF <br /> 11TH AND FERRY STREETS, AND WAS INfORMED BY THE. CITY MANAGER THAT THE SIGN IS. TO BE <br />. SUPPORTED BY A 5-INCH STEEL POLE RATHER. THAN BY A SO~lp BASE AS SHOWN IN THE ORI91~AL <br /> SKETCH. . <br /> IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PUBLIC SAfETY COMMITTEE THAT PERMISSION BE GIVEN <br /> TO INSTALL THIS SIGN ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ,PROVIDING THAT THE SIGN DO~S NOT PROJECT OUT <br /> fURTHER THAN THE NORTH EDGE OF THE SIDEWALK. <br /> " <br /> " . . . <br /> I <br /> " 4. CONTRACT WITH THE STATE ON INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNA~S ON OAK STREET AT SIXTH <br /> AND SEVENTH AVENUES - THE COMMITTEE WAS INFORMED BY THE CITY MANAGER THAT THE QUALIFI- <br /> ii CATION INCLUDED IN, THE RESOLUTION ADOPTED JULY 26, 1954 LIMITING THE CITY'S CONTRIBUTION <br /> :1 <br /> I' TO $3,000.00 WAS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO THE STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT IN THAT I~ DID NOT CON- <br /> ;1 FORM TO THE EXISTING POLICY OF THE STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION I <br />I OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE THAT APPROVAL BE GIVEN TO THE RESOLUTION AS ORIGINALLY <br /> DRAWN IN WH~CH THE CITY WOULD BEAR ONE-HALF OF THE COST OF THE INSTALLATION ESTIMATED <br /> TO BE $3,000.00. IT IS A~SO A ~ECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE THAT IN THE FUTURE IN <br /> THESE JOINTLY .PONSORED PROJECTS, THAT IT BE STIPULATED THAT THE JOB BE AWARDED <br /> SUBJECT T~ THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY or EUGENE, AND THAT THE STATE HIGHWAY DE~ARTMENT BE <br /> " NOTIFIED OF THE REQUEST fOR SUCH A PROVISIO~ IN FUTURE CONTRACTS. <br /> " <br /> 5. REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF THE CENTER STRIP FROM VILLARD STREET BETWEEN FAIRMOUNT. I <br /> BOULEVARD AND FRANKLIN BOULEVARD - AT'A PREVIOUS MEETING, THE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC <br />e SAFETY COMMIJTEE DISCUSSED THIS REQUEST AND INSPECTED THE CENTER STRIP ON VILLARD STREET. <br /> IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION or THE COMMITTEE THAT ACTION ON THIS PROPOSED PROJECT BE DELAYED. <br /> 6. REQUEST rOR AcCURB CUT AT 13TH, FRANKLIN, AND VILLARD - IT WAS EXPLAINED TO THE <br /> COMMITTEE THAT A REQUEST HAD BEEN RECEIVED FOR A SERVICE ST~TION TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON <br /> THE SOUTHWEST,CORNER or FRANKLIN BOULEVARD AND VILLARD STREET. IT WAS EXPLAINED BY THE <br /> TRAFFIC ENGINEER THAT THIS CURB CUT AND THE NORTH ENTRA~CE TO THIS PROPOSED STATION <br /> WOULD BE DIRECTLY OPPOSITE WHERE 13TH AVENUE MERGES WITH FRANKLIN BOULEVARD, AND THAT <br /> POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS TRAVELING EAST ON FRANKLIN BOULEVARD WOULD HAVE TO TURN DIRECT~Y <br /> IN FRONT OF VEHICLES COMING OUT Of 13TH AVENUE)N ORDER TO GET INTO THIS STATION. <br /> .. <br /> THE COMMI TTEE INSPECTED THIS INTERSECTION AND THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT <br /> AND, AfTER DISCUSSION OF THE MATTER, IT WAS FELT THAT A CURB CUT AT THIS POINT. SHOULD <br /> NOT BE GRANTED. IT IS. THEREFORE THE RECOMMENDATION or THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE THAT <br /> THE REQUEST FOR A CURB CUT AT THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION BE DENIED ON THE BASIS THAT THE <br />I GRANTING OF IT WOULD CONTRIBUTE TOWARD A TRAffiC HAZARD WHICH IS ALREADY SERIOUS AT <br /> THIS INTERSECTION. . <br /> \ <br />e <br /> ~ <br />