My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item C: MWMC IGA
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 05/09/05 WS
>
Item C: MWMC IGA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:19:14 PM
Creation date
5/4/2005 3:15:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/9/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
setting the regional wastewater user rates, and what authority the council has in the review and approval <br />of the implementation of the capital projects contained in the 2004 Facilities Plan. The MWMC <br />establishes regional wastewater user rates on an annual basis. These rates are part of the annual regional <br />wastewater program budget, which must be ratified by the governing bodies before they go into effect <br />(see Section 13 of the proposed IGA). The governing bodies, therefore, have approval authority over <br />the annual regional wastewater budget and associated user rates, with the exception of that portion of the <br />user rates necessary to meet bond covenants and to achieve and maintain an un-enhanced credit rating of <br />A for the commission' s bonds from at least one nationally recognized rating agency. <br /> <br />The annual review and approval authority of the governing bodies extends to the capital improvement <br />program as well, since the capital projects are listed in, and funded through, the annual regional <br />wastewater budget. Any of the governing bodies may object to the capital projects list in an annual <br />budget for the regional wastewater program, which would require written notification to the commission <br />of the specific reason for the objection and a request for reconsideration. Under Section 13 of the IGA, <br />if a governing body objects to the commission's decision after reconsideration, the governing body may <br />refer the matter to the general membership of the Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPC) for mediation <br />in accordance with any procedure adopted by MPC. Furthermore, the draft IGA calls for the MWMC <br />to update the 2004 Facilities Plan on a five-year frequency, with these scheduled updates to be submitted <br />to the governing bodies for review and approval at least 6 months in advance of the anticipated approval <br />date and accompanied by an estimate of the effect the update may have on sewer user charges and <br />system development charges. <br /> <br />Finally, during the work session a question was asked whether SDCs will fund the new capacity <br />necessary to serve growth in the service area. The 2004 Facilities Plan estimates a total of $144 million <br />(in 2004 dollars) in capital improvement needs over the next 20 years. According to CH2M Hill, $57.8 <br />million of this total is related to projects needed to serve projected growth in the service area during the <br />planning period. The rates derived from the adopted SDC methodology were calculated to raise this <br />amount of funding. For informational purposes, Attachment E includes a project list from the 2004 <br />Facilities Plan which identifies the funding allocation for each project based upon the percentage of the <br />project that is attributed to growth versus the percentage to be funded by existing users. <br /> <br />The council is now scheduled to hold public hearings on the ordinance and resolution related to the <br />amendments to the IGA and issuance of revenue bonds by MWMC, respectively. Final action on both <br />the ordinance and the resolution is scheduled for May 23, 2005. <br /> <br />Financial and/or Resource Considerations <br /> The regional wastewater program is supported by user fees, which are established annually by the <br /> MWMC and reviewed and ratified by the city councils of Eugene and Springfield, and the Lane <br /> County Board of Commissioners. Capital projects are also supported by revenue from systems <br /> development charges (SDCs). The proposed changes to the IGA do not directly affect these rates, <br /> but they improve and strengthen the agreement for the bond market and give the MWMC the ability <br /> to offer revenue bonds that will be competitive in the market. The most cost-effective financing for <br /> the regional wastewater projects is a combination of user fees, SDCs, and bond proceeds. Without <br /> the ability to obtain competitive bond rates, the commission would have to consider raising user <br /> rates in the next fiscal year, possibly by as much as 65%, to generate the necessary revenues. <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2005 Council Agendas\M050509\S050509C.doc <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.