Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r 4', 1 C) <br />'-'~!0 <br /> <br />----~-~--- ~--~-_. - <br />-., - - - - <br /> <br />THCCI TY' MAN"AGER, BE' REQUEST, READ ALOUD THE, PROPOSED, AMENDMENT AND A 01 SC'US~I ON <br />- fOLLOWED WI TH MESSR'S. - SIEGENTHALER AND HOWARD EXPLA I NI'NG THE REQUES,TOf T~E Ci TlZEN' S <br />COMMI TTH. THE MAYOR AND MEMBERS Of THE fl NANCE AND PUBL I C WORKS COM~fi hEE E:XPLAi NED <br />THE-CITY.'S paSITION'lN THE-MATTER. -_I,T WAsnlE COMMITTEE'SfEEL,IN~;fTHAT'ALI.. ARTERiAL <br />PROJECTS COMPLETED. THUS fAR SHOULD BE ASSESSED UNDER THE POLl CY~ I N'; EffECT~ AT' THE 1"1 ME <br />Of THE UNDERTAKING, AND THAT NOW WldH THE NEW UNifORM STREET,SPEClflCATIONS IN EffECT <br />THAT THERE IS NO NEED TO ESTABLISH A NEW PROCEDURE fOR THE fUTURE. <br /> <br />IT IS THEREfORE THE RECOMMENDATioN Of THE COMMITTEES TO THE COUNCIL THAT IT SHOULD <br />BE THE POSITION Of THE COUNCIL THAT ASSESSMENTS STAND AS NOW MADE O'N ALL ARTERIAL PROJECTS <br />COMPLETED, AND THAT NO ACTION BE TAKEN TO PRoeOSE A CHARTER AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE PRESENT <br />METHOD Of ASSESSMENT~rOR LOCAL iMPROVEMENTS." <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. BOOTH, SECONDED BY MR. GODLOVE THAT THE REPORT or THE PUBLIC WORKS AND <br />rVNANCE COMMITTEES BE ADOP~ED.~ ROLLCALL VOTE. MOTION CARRIED. fl9E COUNCILMEN V~TED "AYE" <br />AND TWO- VOTED "NO". THOSE VOTING "NO'~ WERE MESSRS. HARTMAN AND OWEN. <br /> <br />REPORTS Of BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS <br /> <br />10 A REPORT Of THE BOARD Of ApPEALS MEETING HELD ON MAY 4, 1955 - RE: REQUESTS fOR VARIANCES <br />fROM THE ZONI NG AND S'I'GN OROI NANCES WAS'SUBMI TTED AND READ - AS fOLLOWS:' <br /> <br />"THE BOARD OF" ApPEALS'HELD A REGULAR MEETING AT THE: CITY HALl-MAY:4, 1955 TO <br />CONSIDER THE fOLLOWING REQUESTS fOR VARIANCES fROM THE ZONING AND siGN ORDiNANCES. <br /> <br />MEIii1BERS PRESENT:: MR~,'VAAlER;:MR.'BALZHISER, MR. MORRIS, AND-'MR. GILLI''i..AN.'-'''~ <br /> <br />~I' .-,. ~- r' <br /> <br />I. REQUEST fROM MR. HOWARD NEEDHAM REPRESENTING THE EMERALD BAPTIST CHURCH fOR <br />WAIVER Of SET BACKS TO ACCOMMODA[E A CHURCH AND EDUCATIONAL PLANT AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER <br />Of 19TH AVENUE AND'PATTERSON, STREETS. ., <br /> <br />-.. I <br /> <br />ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS ARE 50 fOOT SET BACKS fROM INTERIOR PROPERTY LINES AND THE <br />WIDTH OF~ACLEYS MAY~BE INCLUDED I.N'THE SET BACK~ - -. <br /> <br />THIS PROPERTY IS BOUNDED ON THE EAST AND NORTH BY 14 fOOT ALLEYS, THEREBY, REDUCING <br />THE SET BACK TO 36 fEET ON THE PROPERTY. <br /> <br />THE REQUEST. Of THE CHURCH IS FOR A 20 fOOT,'SET'BACK ON THE .NORTH SIDE AND 22 fEET <br />ON THE EAST SIDE, BOTH TO':fNCLUDE THE,ALLEY WIDTH. OfF STREET PARKING fACILITIES HAVE <br />BEEN ARRANGED fOR WITH'SCHOOL DISTRICT No.4, fOR USE Of THE HiGH-SCHOOL PARKING AREA <br />ON P'ATTERSON STREET. n_ . . <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVE;D BY MR. GrLLILAN AND -SECONDED BY MR.-BALZHISER. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS <br />GRANTrNG',THE ,REQUEST 'FOR- SET'BACK -WAI VERS PROVIDI NG'THEADJOINI NG PROPERTY OWNERS PRE'SENT <br />LETTERS TO THE EffECT THAT THERE IS NO OBJECTION BY THEM TO A REDUCTfO~:Of THE.REQ6fRED <br />SET BACKS. <br /> <br />'2. COMMUNICATION fROM THE MARTIN SIGN-COMPANY TO WAIVE THE SIGN REQUIREMENTS Of <br />THE ZONING ORDINANet-TO PERMIT A SIGN:TO PROJECT OVER THE SiDEWALK;APPROXIMATELY SEVEN <br />fEET. <br /> <br />THE PROPOSED SIGN IS 8 fEET LONG'AND 2 FEET HIGH WITH THE WORD "MOTEL" TO BE ERECTED <br />AT 400 WEST 6TH AV~NUE FOR THE TOWN HOUSE MOTEL. THIS IS I~ THE C-I LIMITED COMMERflAL <br />DISTRICT. <br /> <br />THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT THE SIGN BE HUNG IN ACCORDANCE~WITH THE ORDINANCE REQUIRE- <br />MENTS. <br /> <br />3. REQUE$TOf -MARTIN SIGN COMPANy'ON BEHALf Of THE SECURITy,SIGN COMPANY fOR WAIVER <br />Of HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS FOR SIGNS. <br /> <br />:THERE ARE FOU~SIGNS FOR tHE AsioCIATED' OIL C~MPANY'STATI6NS IN EUGE~E. <br /> <br />THE SIGNS ARE CIRCULAR AND PLACED AT THE CORNER Of THE SERVICE STATIONS AND PROJECT <br />OVER THE SIDEWALK APPROXIMATELY SIX fEET AND HUNG 12 fEET ABOVE THE SIDEWALK. <br /> <br />IN ACCO~DANCE WITH THE Si"GN CODE REQUIREMENTS fOR HORIZONTAL SIGNS"THEY SHOULD 'BE <br />20 FEET ABOVE THE SIDEWALK" SECTI ON 5A, ORDI NANCE No~ 8281: <br /> <br />~'fOR THE PURPOSE - OF PREVENTI NG THE BLANKETI NG Of ONE 51 GN I;3Y ANOTHER, THE <br />, fOLLOWING TABLES REGULATING THE ~IZE O~ THE SIGN ACCORDING TO I-TS LOCATION SHALL <br />- - . <br />GOVERN. <br /> <br />,SECTION 5C. NO'SIGNSHACL BE CLOSER-THAN 12-INCHES TO A VERTICAL LINE PASSING <br />THROUGH THE-CURB UNLESS SUCH SIGN IS AT LEASf '12 FEET ABOVE THE SID~WAL~~" <br /> <br />IN APPLYING-TME~~ABLE tN SECTIONS 5A. fOR A HORIZONTAL SIGN WHICH PROJECTS MORE THAN <br />THREE FEET OVER THE 51DEWALK THE DI,STANCE fROM THE WALK TO THE 51 GN 15 20 fEET. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br />\ <br />I <br />II <br />If <br />'I <br />II <br />il <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br /> <br />I' <br />II <br />'I <br />!I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />jl <br />II <br />,I <br />II <br />II <br />II <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br />