Laserfiche WebLink
<br />44~ <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />THE SIGNS WERE HUNG 12f"EET. HOWEVER, DUE TO THEIR LOCATION ON. THE SERVICE STATION <br />LOTS THERE WILL BE NO BLANKETING OF OTHER SIGNS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH' SECTION 5C. THE <br />12 FEET MAY BE PERMISSABLE. <br /> <br />THE BOARD CONSIDERED THIS REQUEST, ALTHOUGH NOT.A SIGN BOARD' or APPEALS, AND <br />RECOMMENDED THAT THE SIGNS MEET THE CODE REQUIREMENTS. <br /> <br />THERE BEING No,rURTHER BUSINESS, MEETING WAS ADJOURNED."_ <br /> <br />L <br /> <br />IN CONNECTION WITH THE REPORT, A LETTER FROM THE EMERALD BAPTIST CHU~CH WAS SUBMITTED AND <br />READ AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />"WE WISH TO REFER YOU TO OUR LETTER OF APRIL 29TH 1955, ADDRESSED TO THE BOARD <br />OF ApPEALS, RE.LATI VE TO T:fiE ERECT I ON OF A CHURCH BUI LDI NG ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT <br />NI NETEENTH AND: PATTERSON STREETS. . AN ARCHI TECT HAS 'BEEN' RETAI NED AND PLANS SUBMI TTED" <br />FOR CONSI'DERATION. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />THESE PLANS WERE DEVELOPED, KEEPING IN MIND OUR DESIRE TO MAKE THE STRUCTURE PLEASING, <br />BEAUTrFUL, SAFE 'AND USEFUL~ YET WITHIN OUR MEANS. THE STRUCTURE PLANNE~ IS A SINGLE <br />STOR~ BUILDING WITH A, ONE-HALF BASEMENT. THE HEIGHT TO THE EAVES WILL BE ABOUT 20 ~EET, <br />WITH'A~~VERHANG OF ABOUT THREE rEET. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />HOWEVER, TO BUILD THIS STRUCTURE, WE REQUESTED THE ApPEAL BOARD TO GRANT A VARIANCE <br />OF THE SET BACK REQPIREMEN~S TO 20 FEET ON THE NORTH SIPE AND 22 FEET ON THE EAST SIDE, <br />TO PROV I DE THE NECESSARY SPACE TO MEET THE NEEDS OF A CITY CHURCH. . TH I S BOARD HAS <br />RECOMMENDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE VARIANCE BE GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE CONSENT OF <br />THE ADJOI NI-NG PROPERTY 'OWNERS. AT THE TI ME THI S BOARD MET WE UNDERSTOOD THAT THE <br />ADJOI NI NG PROPERTY OWNERS ON THE NORTH WERE WI LL'rNG TO GI VE THEI R CONSENT. HOWEVER, <br />WHEN WE WENT TO SECURE THE WRITTEN CONSENT WE LEARNED THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER ON THE, <br />EAST-REFUSED CONSENT AND tiAD TALKED THE OWNERS ON. THE NORTH INTO WITHDRAWING THEIR <br />CONSENT. <br /> <br />IN VIEW OF THIS NEW SITUATiON WE REQUEST' THAT THE COUNCIL GIVE CONSIDERATION TO <br />. ' . <br />OUR APPEAL ON THE BAS'I S or HARDSHI P AND NEED, AND FOR .THE FOLLOWI'NG REASONS: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I. ANY ~EDUCTION IN THE AVAILABLE SPACE WILL. SERIOUSLY HAR~'THE USEFULNESS ~F <br />THE PROPERTY AS A SITE FOR A CITY. CHURCH BUILDING. <br /> <br />2. THE~,E IS NO O-TliER PROPERTY AVAILABLE IN,THE'AREA,WHICH WILL MEET OUR NEEDS. <br /> <br />3. WITHOUT THE REQUESTED SET BACK'THE AVAILABLE SPACE"WOULD'BE REDUCED TO APPROXI- <br />MATELY 'FIFTY PER CENT OF THE PLANNED EDUCATIONAL UNIT. <br /> <br />IT IS OUR DESIRE'TOERECT A STRUCTURE WHICH WILL BE PLEASING IN APPEARANCE, <br />AT~RACTIV~ TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD,_ AND SAFE FOR BOTH CHILDREN AND ADULTS WHO WILL BE USING <br />THE BUILDING FOR MANY YEARS. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />IN VIEW OF THE PRECEDENT ALREADY ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY COUNCIL IN GRANTING SIMILAR <br />VARIANCE REQUESTS TO OTHER CHURCH GROUPS, WE EARNESTLY PETITION THAT WE BE GRANTED THIS <br />PRIV.ILEGE." <br /> <br />THE LETTER AND THE GENERAL SUBJECT WAS REFERRED BY THE MAYOR TO THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMI'TTEE. <br /> <br />!T WAS MOVED BY MR. KOPPE,. SECONDED BY MR. BOOTH THAT ITEM NUMBER ONE BE DELETED, AND] <br />THAT THE BALANCE OF THE REPORT OF THE BOARD OF ApPEALS BE ADOPTED. MOTION CARRIED; <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />A PET,TION TO REZONE THE PROPERTY AT 573 EAST BROADWAY WAS SUBMITTED BY ROBERT DAVIS. <br />HIS REQUEST IS TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE C-I CLASSIFICATION, RESTAU- <br />RANTS WITH ALL FOOD SERVED WITHIN THE PREMISES. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. KOPPE, SECONDED BY MR. GOOLOVE THAT THE PETITION BE REFERRED TO JHE. <br />CI'TY ATTORNEY FOR THE NECESSARY RESOLUTION, AND TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR CONSIDERATION <br />AT THEIR N~XT',MEETINg ON JUNE,7, 1955 WITH'THE REQUEST THAT THE COMMISSION MAKE AN IMMEDIATE <br />REPORT. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />12 PETITION FOR SIDEWALK ON-BOTH SIDES OF TAYLOR. STREET FRO~ 6TH TO 11TH AVENUES WAS SUB- <br />MI ITED. <br /> <br />THE PETITION WAS REFERRED TO THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE BY THE MAYOR. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />PETITION FROM CITIZENS RESIDING ON CHARNELTON STREET BETWEEN 29TH AND 30TH ~VENUES PRQ~ <br />TESTING THE PAVING OF CHARNELTON STREET THIS YEAR AND REQUESTING THAT IT B~ POSTPONED UNTIL <br />NEXT YEAR WAS SUBMITTED. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. KOPPE, SECONDED BY MR. GODLOVE THAT THE PETITION BE REFERRED TO THE <br />PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE AND THAT ANOTHER PETITION BE SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />e. <br /> <br />..... <br />