|
<br />@~~
<br />Q.,j 6
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />/.
<br />
<br />A. REVIEW THE PREVIOUSLY PREPARED PL'ANsrOR UNiTARY rACILl'TlESIN ntESEARE'AS; MAKE
<br />SUCH CHANGES AS WOULD APPEAR DESIRABLt IN LIGHT or DEVELOPMENTS WHICH HAVE TAKEN PLAC!
<br />WITHIN THE ARE~' SIN~E THE ORIGINAL STUDY WAS CONDUCTED AND IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE'~RE~ENT
<br />LOCATION OF' SEWAGE TREATMENT FACILIT1ES.-
<br />
<br />B. PREPARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR BOTH GRAVITY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM AN~RA~
<br />SEWAGE PUMPING F'ACILITIES TO COLLECT AND TRANSPORT THE SEWAGE rROM THE AREAS TO THE
<br />SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT.
<br />
<br />C. ESTIMATE THE ADDED POPULATION WHICH CAN BE SERVED BY THE; EUGENE SEWAGE TREAT':'
<br />MENT PLANT BEF'ORE ADDITIONAL SEWAGE TREATMENT F'ACILITIES ARE REQUIRED AT THE TREATMENT
<br />PLANT.
<br />
<br />D. 'PREPARE UP-TO-DATE CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATES rOR SEWAGE COL~ECTION
<br />F'ACILITIES, RAW SEWAGE PUMPING STATIONS AND, SEWAGE TREATMENT EXPANSION REQUIRED F'OR
<br />THE AREAS IN QUESTION.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />E. PREPARE AND PRESENT A REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL SETTING FORTH THE RESULTS' OF'
<br />THE ENGINEERING STUDY AND ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS.
<br />
<br />WE WOULD PROPOSE~TO ACCOMPLISH THIS WORK AT OUR STANDARD PER DIEM RATES AT A TOTAL
<br />COST NOT TO EXCEED EIGHT HUNDRED AND FORTY DOLLARS ($840.00)
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />WE WILL BE GLAD TOMEET WITH YOU AND DISCUSS THE PROPOSED WORK AND ADJUST THE STUDY
<br />TO COMPLY W ITft CHANGES YOU OR THE C I TV COUNC I L MAY WISH TO MAKE."
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. BOOTH, SECONDED BY MR. KOPPE, THAT THIS COMMUNICATION BE REF'ERREDTO
<br />THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE AND THE,FINANCECOMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />13
<br />
<br />COMMUNICATION FROM DR. L. R. SORENSON, ~RESIDENT OF' EDISO~ SCHOOL PARENT TEACHER
<br />ASSOCIATION - RE: REQUEST TO PLACE FLUORIDATION ISSUE ON THE MAY PRIMARY ELECTION BALLOT WAS
<br />SUBMITTED AND READ AS F'OLLOWS:
<br />
<br />"AT THE LAST REGULAR MEET~NG OF' THE EDfSON SCHOOk PARENT TEACHERS ASSOCIATIONi' II WAS
<br />I'NSTRUCTED BY THE MEMBERSHIP OF OUR ORGANIZATION TO WRITE :YOU A 'LETTER ASKING THAT THE
<br />CITY COUNCIl.; TAKE ACTION :TO PLAtE THEF'LUORIDATI'ON ISSUE ON THE MAY,PRIMARY ELECTI'ON"~
<br />BALLOT SO THAT THE PEOPLE OF' THE CITY MIGHT VOTE ON THE PROBLEM. '
<br />
<br />I"
<br />
<br />THE MEMBERS OF OURORGANI ZAT ION, ,APPARENTL YCONCERNED OVER THE, I,MPORTANCE/OF' TH IS
<br />VITAL ISSUE, rPASSEDA UNANI MOUS RESOLUTION, ,RECOMMENDt:NG, ACTION BY YOUR ,GROUP 'SO 'THAT
<br />A DECISION MIGHT BE REACHED AT AN EARLY DATE.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />A MEMBER O~'OUR ORGANIZATION, .IN'PROPOS~NG!THE RESOLUTION, INDICATED THAT THE' r
<br />'RESUL TS'I N OBTAI'NI NG BETTER ',DENTAL 'HEAL TH'I,N 'OTHER .OREGON'C I'TrES AND THROUGHOUT . THE.
<br />NATION HAD BEEN QUITE SPECTACULAR. HE CITED STATISTICS F'ROM THE CITY OF' ASTORIA VHERE
<br />ELUORIDATION HAD BEEN IN OPERATION F'OR NEARLY EIGHT YEARS AND WHERE TOOTH DECAY IN
<br />CH I LDREN HAD BEErN GREATLY ,-REDUCED." I,T WAS AI;SO,-POI NTED :OUT, THAT MANY STATE AND COUNTY
<br />HEALT~ AUTHORITIES AS WELL AS THE AMERICAN_DEN~AL SOCIETYAND:MEMBERS OF 'THE MEDICAL
<br />PROFESSION HAD ENDORSED F'LUORIDATION.
<br />
<br />IN TH I'S LETTER, I DO NOT MEANT,O "SAY T:HA T OUR GROUP ENDORSED F'(.'UORI DA'TI'ON,' 'HOWEVER,
<br />IT IS POSSIBLE SUCH ADT/ON COULD-BE, TAKENLA'ER IF,:1:1 I'S WITHIN THE SCOPE OF' OUR CONST/TU-
<br />~ION. SEVERAL OF' OUR MEMBERSHIP ARE HOW INVESTIGATING WHETHER A PTA GROUP IS ABLE, UNDER
<br />ITS CONSTITUTION, TO TAKE A ST.AND ON A MATTER SUCH AS THIS. WE HOPE FOR A F'AVORABLE
<br />CONSIDERATION OF' OUR REQUEST."
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. 'HARTMAN, SECONDED BY MR. OwEN, THAT THIS COMMUNICATION BE RECEIVED AND
<br />PLACED ON F'ILE. ROLLCALL VOTE. MESSRS. BOOTH, KOPPE, WATSON, SHEARER AND SHISLER VOTING NAY.
<br />MR. GODLOVE ABSENT. MOTION DEFEATED.
<br />
<br />, '
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. KOPPE, SECONDED BY MR. SHEARER, THAT THIS COMMUNICATION BE REF'ERRtD
<br />TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />ORDINANCES
<br />
<br />14
<br />
<br />COUNC~L BILL No. 2050 - RE: LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR S.DEWALK ON WILLAMETTE ,STREET F'ROM'
<br />17TH TO 19TH AVENUES, INTRODUCED AND GIVEN F'IRST READING ON FEBRUARY 14, 1956 WAS BROUGHT ON
<br />FOR CONSI DERATI",ON'. THECI TV.' MANA'GER REPORTED; ONE WR:I TTENPROTEST. ON rl LE. ..1
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. BOOTH, SECONDED BY MR. XOPPE, THAT THE BILL BE READ THE SECOND TIME BY
<br />TITLE ONLY, WITH UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF' THE COUNCIL. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE BILL WAS
<br />READ THE SECOND TI ME' 'BY TI TLEONLY.
<br />
<br />, 1._' ~ ' t . t .' , ,
<br />
<br />":-:' i .~
<br />
<br />[~ '
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />I T WAS MOVED BY MR. BOOTH, SECONDED BY MR. KOPPE, THAT T.HE' RULES BE SUSPENDED AND THE BILL
<br />BE READ THE THIRD TIME BY TITLE ONLY, WITH UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF THE COUNCIL. MOTION CARRIED
<br />UNANIMOUSLY ANDrTHE BILLWA'S.READ'TiHE" THIRD TIME .BY T'ITLE' ONL:Y.: ':' ,_,
<br />
<br />y
<br />
<br />, T :
<br />
<br />'I 'T '(
<br />
<br />I.~ I .. ~
<br />
<br />-
<br />
<br />I T WAS MOVED BY MR. BOOTH, SECONDED B'Y MR. 'KOPPE," THAT THECOUNC'L B',LL BE APPROVED AND
<br />GIVEN F'INAL PASSAGE., ROLLCALL VOTE. ALL COUNCILMEN PRESENT VOTING AYE. MR. GODLOVE ABSENT.
<br />THE BILL WAS DECLARED PASSED AND NUMBERED 10747.
<br />
<br />~
<br />
|