Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Pryor commented that he was normally disinclined to address issues that were far away from <br />the business of the City. He said there were many issues that were appropriate in a larger forum that did <br />not involve the City, its jurisdiction, and what it had to do. He thought once in a while, an issue came <br />forward that, while not directly related to the City, was so important in its impact that the City should at <br />least take a stand. He stated that torture was reprehensible. He supported the resolution, but stressed that <br />he would not support every big issue that came before the council. He encouraged the council to reserve <br />such resolutions for very special instances given that the council had a lot of business to conduct for the <br />City. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion passed, 7:1; Councilor Solomon voting in <br /> opposition. <br /> <br />4. PUBLIC HEARING: <br /> Resolution 4831 Forming a Local Improvement District For Paving, Constructing Curbs and <br /> Gutters, Sidewalks, Pedestrian Medians, Street Lights, and Stormwater Drainage on River <br /> Avenue From 200 Feet East of River Road to 100 Feet West of Beltline Highway <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor asked Michclle Cahill, Principal Civil Engineer for the Public Works Department, to <br />provide a brief overview of thc proposed resolution. <br /> <br />Ms. Cahill stated that the public hearing was primarily to consider whether a local improvement district <br />(LID) should be formed for River Avenue. She reported that the initial hearing had been held by a <br />Hearings Official in the summer of 2004, and was continued before the council because of the number of <br />remonstrances received at that hearing. She said the Lane Board of County Commissioners reconsidered <br />its action of the summer of 2004 as well, and approved an order in February 2005, that authorized the City <br />to assess the ten unincorporated properties that had frontage on River Avenue. Additionally, she stated <br />that the contractor had agreed to hold to its original bid at the prices of the summer of last year. She <br />indicated that the street plan was consistent with the arterial collector street plan and with the County's <br />standards for an urban major collector. <br /> <br /> Ms. Cahill outlined the changes that had been made to the design standards for the project: sidewalk width <br /> was recommended to be changed from ten feet to five feet on a setback walk and six and a half feet for a <br /> curbside walk. She said in order to minimize the right-of-way action and conflicts to the trees, the City <br /> planned to "meander" the sidewalk. She indicated the third exception to the design standards was the <br /> inclusion of a turn lane at the west end of the project. She reminded the council that it was scheduled to <br /> take action on April 20, 2005. <br /> <br /> Mayor Piercy called for a five-minute break at 9:01 p.m. <br /> <br /> Upon reconvening, Mayor Piercy reviewed the remaining agenda and determined that it was unlikely that <br /> the council would take action on Agenda Item 7: Resolution 4832 Authorizing the City Manager to Make <br /> Application to the State of Oregon for Designation of a West Eugene Enterprise Zone. <br /> <br /> Mayor Piercy opened the public hearing and reviewed the rules for testimony. <br /> <br /> Anna Morrison, 125 East 8th Avenue, speaking on behalf of the Lane Board of County Commissioners, <br /> stated that on February 9, 2005, through Resolution and Order Number 05-2-9-5, the County <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 11, 2005 Page 11 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />