|
<br />~
<br />192
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />IT IS OUR,UNDERSTANDI.NG THATCITyCOUNC'ILiAPPROVAL: 'IS-,REQUIRED IN THI'S CASE' BECAUSE
<br />THE SIGN REGULATIONS FOR THE ZONING IN THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION DO NOT PERMIT ,THIS 'SIZE;
<br />SIGN. ENCLOSED IS A DRAWING SHOWING THE STRUCTURAL DETAILS AND AN ARCHITECTURAL VIEW OF
<br />THE PROPOSED SIGN AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PROPOSED AND PRESENT IDENTIFICATION
<br />SIGNS FOR THE STATION. VISIBILITY OF THE PRESENT SIGN AT THIS LOCATION HAS BECOME IM-
<br />PAIRED BY THE "tNSTALLATION OF OTHER-SIGNS IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY.-
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />.
<br />. ".,
<br />
<br />THIS IS ONE OF OUR MOST-IMPOR~ANT SERVICE STATION OUTLETS IN EUGENE; THEREFORE, WE-
<br />DESIRE TO INSTALL OUR LATEST TYPE SIGN TO BRING THIS STATION UP TO CURRENT STANDARDS FOR
<br />IDENTIFICATION. '
<br />
<br />:.j .
<br />
<br />ALL OF OUR NEW STATIONS ARE BEING DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED WiTH SIMILAR FIN SIGNS
<br />AND THESE 51 GNS 'ARE ;AN I NTEGRAL pART 'OF THE BUI LDI NG PARTI CULARLYBECAUSE THE SI GN COLUMN
<br />IS STRUCTURALLY CONNECTED TO THE CANOPY FRA~ING MEMBERS.
<br />
<br />WE NOTE THAT THERE ARE-OTHER SIGNS IN THIS VICINITY THAT 00 NOT CONFORM TO nfECURRENT
<br />ZONING REG~UATIONS AND THAT PROJtCT 'BEYOND THE PROPERTY LINE~ SHOUL~ YOU 'DESIRE ~O INSPECT
<br />A SIMILAR TYPE FIN SIGN, OUR STANDARD STATION LOCATED AT 7TH AND ALMADEN STREETS IN EUGENE
<br />IS EQUIPPED wl'TH A,SIMILAR r1H:SIGN.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />YOUR EARLY CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION IS SOLICITED."
<br />
<br />I TWAS MOVED- 'BY MR. BOOTH,' SECONDED' By,MR. KOPPE, THAT THI S COMMUNI,CATI ON BE REFERRED TO
<br />THE PUBLIC SAf'ETY COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED.'
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />16
<br />
<br />COMMUNICATION FROM CROW GRANGE, #450 - RE': OPPOSITION TO THE FLUORIDATION' OF WATER WAS
<br />SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS:
<br />
<br />"BE I T RESOLVED, THA'T CRCM GRA'NGE, #450, GOES ON RECORD AS -OPPOSI NG THE FLUORIDATION
<br />OF OUR PUBLfC WATER SUPPLIES: '-~"
<br />
<br />AND BE IT F'URTHER RESOLVED THAT COPIES OF THIS RESOLUTION BE SENT TO LANE COUNTY
<br />POMONA GRANGE,- OR"t:GON STATE GRANGE, 'THE' [UGENEC'I TY COUNCI L, AND TO THE EUGE'NE REGI STER-
<br />GUARD, COTTAGE GROVE- SENTINEL"SPRINGFIELDNEWS'AND'THE,JUNCTlON CITY TIMES..
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVE~ BY MR. BOOTH~ SECONDED' ByMR. KOPPE, ,THAT THE COMMUNICATION BE RECEIVED AND
<br />PLACED ON FILE. MOTION,CARRIED.
<br />
<br />17 COMMUNICATION F'ROM HART, SPENCER,: MCCULLOiH, ROCKWOO~'AND DAVIES, ATTORNEY~ -,RE: REQUEST
<br />ON BEHALF' OF OREGON ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY TO EXTEND THEIR SPUR TRACK WAS SUBMITTED AND READ'
<br />AS FOLLOWS:
<br />
<br />"AT THE PRESENT TIME' OREGON' ELECTRI CRAI LW'AY COMPANY, OUR'CLI ENT', IS' OPERATI NG A
<br />RAI LROAD SPUR' ,TRAC'K. ACROSS CERU;-I N STREETS I N THE CI TY OF EUGENE PURSUANT TO THE ORDI NANCE
<br />No. 9127, APPROVED BY THE MAYOR OF EUGENE ON THE 13TH DAY OF APRIL,' 1948'.
<br />
<br />THE RAILWAY COMPANY WISHES TO EXTEND THIS SPUR TRACK ALONG FIF'TH AVENUE WEST A
<br />DISTANCE OF 145~~FEET, AND ASKED US TO SUBMIT TO THE CI'TY OF EUGENE A PROPOS~D ORDINANCE
<br />GRANTING TO T~E RAILWAY COMPANY THE~IGHT' TO CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN THIS EXTENSION.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />WE DISCUSSED THI S MATTER WI TH MR. JOHN W. PENNI NGTON, CI TY ATTORNEY OF': THE CITY OF'
<br />EUGENE, ON THE ~ELEPHONE ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 23, 1956, AND HE SUGGESTED THAT WE FORWARD TO
<br />YOU THE PROPOSED ORD'INANCE.
<br />
<br />ACCORDINGLY, WE HAVE PREPARED AND ARE FORWARDING HEREWITH ORIGINAL AND TWO COPIES
<br />OF' BILL FOR PROPOSED ORDINANCE' GRANTING TO THE RAILWAy-COMPANY THE -RIGHT! TO CONSTRUCT AND
<br />MAINTAI N SUCH AN EXTENSION, TOGETHER WI TH THREE COPI ES OF MAP SHOWI NG THE LOCATI ON OF THE
<br />PROPOSED EXTENSION.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />WILL YOU PLEASE UNDERTAKE TO PUT THIS MATTER BEFORE THE COMMON-COUNCIL AT ITS NEXT
<br />MEET I NG AND WILL YOU P,LEASE NOT I FY 'US -AS- SOON AS I THE ORDI NANCE HAS BEE'N PASSED BY THE
<br />COMMON COUNCIL AND APPROVED BY THE MAYOR."
<br />
<br />I T WAS MOVED BY MR.' BOOTH, ,SECOND'ED BY MR. KOPPE, THAT TH I S COMMUNI CA TlON' BE REFERRED TO
<br />THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTE'E. MOTION CARRIED'-
<br />
<br />18 COMMUNICATION FROM ROBERT C. MCKAY - RE: CHANGING ,THE NAME OF RONALD STREET WAS SUBMITTED
<br />AND READ AS FOLLOWS :', . .
<br />
<br />"THI S I S TO I NFORM YOU OF TWO CONFLI CTI NG STREETS LOCATED I N THE NEWER SECTIONS OF
<br />THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE CI TY. "DONALD" AND "RONALD" STREETS. '
<br />j ,
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />As THEY ARE BOTH IN THE SAME FIRE DISTRICT, TO SAY NOTHI'NG OF 'P-OLICE, AMBULANCE,
<br />MAIL, DELIVERYMAN, ETCETERA, I BELIEVE THAT THE NAME OF RONALD STREET SHOULD BE CHANGED
<br />AT THIS TIME.
<br />
<br />..e
<br />
<br />ACCORDING TO YOUR SKETCH MAPS, I BELIEVE KINCAID STREET WILL BE EXTENDED TO CONNECT
<br />WITH RONALD. IF' THIS IS SO, I WOULD SUGGEST THAT IT WOULD ASSUME ITS NEW NAME NOW WHEN
<br />ONLY A LIMITED NUMBER OF PEOPLE ARE AFF'ECTED."
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />'-
<br />
|