My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2C: Ratif. of IGR Actions
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 05/09/05 Mtg
>
Item 2C: Ratif. of IGR Actions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:33:48 PM
Creation date
5/4/2005 3:21:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/9/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT E <br /> <br /> MINUTES <br /> <br /> Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations <br /> McNutt Room--City Hall <br /> <br /> April 14, 2005 <br /> 9 a.m. <br /> <br />PRESENT: Gary Pap6, Chair; Bonny Bettman, Betty Taylor, Mary Walston, Jason Heuser, Lisa <br /> Klemp, Greg Rikhoff, City Manager's Office; Ellwood Cushman, Trent Spralding, Eugene <br /> Police Department; Kristi Hammitt, Larry Hill, Myrnie Daut, Patty Boyle, Central Services <br /> Department; Eric Jones, Scott Duckett, Sarah Medrey, Peggy Kepler, Tom Larson, Public <br /> Works Department; Kurt Yeiter, Susan Muir, Richie Weinman, Planning and Development <br /> Department; Jerome Lidz, City Attorney's Office. <br /> <br />1. Call to Order/Review Agenda <br /> <br />Mr. Pap6 called the meeting of the Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations to order. He thanked <br />staff and Ms. Taylor for their work at City Hall Day in Salem the previous day. Ms. Taylor said it <br />appeared progress could be made on the Forest Legacy Program issue. <br /> <br />2. Review Pending Legislation <br /> <br />Priority 1 Bills' <br /> <br />HB 3056 <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman questioned the recommended position to oppose House Bill (HB) 3056, related to urban <br />renewal districts, as it did not impact the City's existing urban renewal districts. Ms. Cutsogeorge said <br />during the council's discussion of amendments to the downtown district plan, there was discussion of the <br />potential of expanding the district in 2009. The bill could impact those plans. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman preferred to take a neutral position on the bill, given that the expansion date was pretty far out. <br />Ms. Brooks pointed out the bill gave the County veto authority over the formation of urban renewal districts. <br /> <br /> Ms. Taylor, seconded by Ms. Bettman, moved to change the status of the bill to Neutral. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap6 opposed the motion for the reasons stated by staff. <br /> <br /> The motion passed, 2:1; Mr. Pap6 voting no. <br /> <br />The committee agreed to the bill would be dropped from lobbying given the neutral status assigned it. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations April 7, 2005 Page 1 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.