My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2C: Ratif. of IGR Actions
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 05/09/05 Mtg
>
Item 2C: Ratif. of IGR Actions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:33:48 PM
Creation date
5/4/2005 3:21:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/9/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
election day seven days prior to the election; the bill would change that to no sooner than 8:30 a.m. the day <br />of the election. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asked who supported the bill. Ms. Brooks said that it was sponsored by representatives <br />Crummel, Thatcher, and Flores. She said organizations such as Common Cause might be in support of the <br />bill. She noted it had not been scheduled for a hearing at this time. Mr. Pap6 suggested the bill be held over <br />to the next meeting. Ms. Bettman and Ms. Taylor concurred. Ms. Walston indicated staff would consult <br />with County Clerk Annette Newingham regarding her position on the bill. <br /> <br />HB 3105 <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said the bill, which would direct the Department of Justice to distribute funds to local <br />governments for specific purposes related to methamphetamine, appeared to have a big budgetary impact on <br />the State's General Fund, and she questioned the funding split proposed for the City and County. Mr. <br />Cushman clarified that the funds allocated to the County would go to fill the gaps in prosecutorial staff, <br />which was currently a major problem. In addition, some of the funding was targeted toward treatment and <br />education. He acknowledged concerns about the source of the funding, which was why staff recommended <br />the City monitor the bill. <br /> <br />HB 3206 <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Bettman, Ms. Pomes said the bill would prohibit contracting agencies <br />from awarding contracts to nonresident educational service districts but would not limit the number of such <br />districts in the state. She believed it was aimed at a situation involving public improvements and public <br />works contracting in Portland, in which a Vancouver educational service district was contracted to do some <br />work for some Portland school districts. Ms. Pomes noted that the bill had been introduced on the behalf of <br />the General Associated Contractors. For some reason, personal services contracts were also included. She <br />said the bill would limit Eugene's ability to enter into a personal services district with an educational service <br />district outside Oregon. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman expressed appreciation for the clarification. <br /> <br />HB 3364 <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman suggested a higher priority be assigned to the bill, which created a crime of making a false <br />accusation of sexual abuse. Mr. Cushman noted the staff recommendation to oppose the bill, and indicated <br />it had not been scheduled for a hearing. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Pap~, moved to change the status of the bill to Priority 2. <br /> The motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />HB 3370 <br /> <br /> Ms. Taylor moved to change the status of the bill to Oppose. The motion died for lack of a <br /> second. <br /> <br />Mr. Cushman noted the current implied consent law did not include blood or urine tests; the bill merely <br /> <br />MINUTES--Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations April 7, 2005 Page 9 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.