Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> r:::~~ <br /> qj) ".,~ ~ r:i <br /> e <br /> ,-- - - - -- --- - --~- -- --~ - . ~-- - . - - -, -, <br /> - - "I .- <br /> ; <br /> I REPORT Of THE TRAfrlC ENGINEER IN WHICH NO STOP SIGNS WERE RECOMMENDED fOR'THIS <br /> INTERSECTION. <br /> . <br /> 8 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE <br /> I . DISCUS~ION REGARDING PURCHASE OF BASE RADIO STATION fOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT - THE <br /> CITY MANAGER INDICATED THAT TWO BIDS HAD BEEN RECEIVED fOR A BASE STATION FOR THE <br /> FIRE DEPARTMENT, ONE BID fROM GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY AT A COST Of $995.00, AND <br /> THE SECOND BID fROM MOTOROLA COMPANY AT A.COST Of $1300.00. .1 T WAS fURTHER I NDI- <br /> CATED THAT THE SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE fOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT RADIO EQUIPMENT HAD <br /> BY LETTER RECOMMENDED THAT THE MOTOROLA EQUIPMENT BE PURCHASED, BASING SUCH RE- <br /> COMMENDATION ON THE fACT THAT SUCH EQUIPMENT WAS Of A LIKE KIND AS THAT ALREADY <br /> INSTALLED IN SOME Of THE VEHICLES USED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. THE COMMITTEE <br /> fELT THAT SINCE BOTH BIDS WERE ENTERED ON SPECifiCATIONS PREPARED BY THE CITY <br /> ADMINISTRATION AND WERE DEEMtD TO BE EQUAL, THE LOW BID SHOULD BE ACCEPTED AND <br /> IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY BE AWARDED THE BID fOR THE PUR- <br /> CHASE Of THE BASE STATION AT A COST Of $995.00. <br /> e 2. DISCUSSION REGARDING ZONING STUDY ON WILLAMETTE STREET - A REPRESENTATIVE Of THE <br /> COMMITTEE, SUGGESTED THAT A ZONING STUDY SHOULD BE MADE IN THE AREA ALONG WILLA- <br /> METTE STREET fROM 19TH TO 24TH AVENUES SINCE CONSIDERABLE .DISCUSSION HAS BEEN <br /> RAISED,ON THIS SUBJECT IN THE LAST MEETINGS Of THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE LAST MEET- <br /> ING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSI~N. THERE WAS LITTLE DISCUSSION ON THE SUBJECT, AND <br /> IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT A ZONING STUDY ON WILLAMETTE STREET fROM 19TH AVENUE TO <br /> I 24TH PLACE BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR FURTHER STUDY. <br /> 3. DISCUSSION REGARDING PAVING 9f'WILLAMETTE STREET. fROM 32ND AVENUE TO SOUTH CITY <br /> LIMITS - A.MEMBER OF THE COMMITTEE INDICATED THAT COMPLAINTS HAD BEEN RECEIVED <br /> AND IT HAD BEEN NOTED THAT WILLAMETTE STREET WAS IN POOR CONDITION FROM 32ND AVE- <br /> NUE TO THE SOUTH CITY LIMITS. SOME DISCUSSION WAS HAD ON THE POSSIBILITIES Of <br /> PAVING THIS STREET IN THE NEAR fUTURE. IT WAS INDICATED THAT THE CITY DOES NOT . <br /> HAVE ALL Of THE NECESSARY RIGHT-Of-WAY fOR THIS STREET AT THIS TIME, AND IT WOULD <br /> BE NECESSARY TO MAKE A SU~VEY Of THE STREET BEfORE ANY ACTION COULD BE TAKEN. THE <br /> SUBJECT Of THE SURVEY WAS BROADENED TO INCLUDE' 40TH AVENUE AND HILYARD STREET, <br /> AND IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEN~..DO THE NECESSARY,BASIC <br /> ENGINEERING TOWARD THE PAVING Of WILLAMETTE STREET fROM 32ND AVENUE TO SOUTH,CITY <br /> LIMITS, HILYARD STREET fROM 24TH AVENU~ SOUTH AND 40TH AVENUE fROM WILLAMETTE TO <br /> HILYARD STREET. <br /> 4. DISCUSSION'REGARDING,BUDGET COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION THAT MONEY AVAILABLE fOR <br /> STREET IMPROVEMENTS BE USED ON ARTERIAL STREETS - THE COMMITTEE DISCUSSED THE <br /> RECOMMENDATION MADE BY THE BUDGET COMMITTEE AND DURING THE DISCUSS10N ~T WAS <br /> POINTED OUT THAT THE CITY AT THIS TIME IS PROCEEDING ON THE TEN YEAR IMPROVEMENT <br /> PROGRAM AND THAT If THE PROGRAM IS TO BE' COMPLETED AS ORIGINALLY BROUGHT TO THE . <br /> VOTERS, IT WILL BE NECESSARY fOR fUNDS COMING IN fROM THE LEVY TO BE SPENT'IN <br /> ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROGRAM. . THE COMMITTEE 1NDICATED THEY WERE IN AGREEMENT WITH <br /> THE PROCEDURE WHICH HAD BEEN fOLLOWED AND RECOMMENDED. THAT THE POLICY REGARDING <br /> THE PAVING Of ARTERIAL STREETS CURRENTLY IN EXISTENCE BE CONTINUED. <br /> I . <br /> 5. DISCUSSION REGARDING BUDGET'COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING SEWER CONSTRUCTION <br /> TO SERVE THE WEST 11TH AVENUE AREA - DURING THE COURSE Of THE DISCUSSION IT WAS <br /> INDICATED AT THE PRESENT TIME If THE SEWER WERE TO BE BUILT ON A:GRAVITY fLOW A <br /> MAJOR TRUNK LINE WOULD HAVE TO BE RUN THROUGH THE BETHEL AREA WHICH IS NOT WITHIN <br /> THE CITY LIMITS. THE DIRECTOR Of PUBLIC WORKS INDICATED HE'THOUGHT IT BEST TO . <br /> CONSTRUCT A SEWER LINE AND A PUMP STATtON IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IN THE fUTURE If <br /> THE MAIN ARTERIAL LINE IS BUILT THROUGH THE BETHEL AREA, THE SYSTEM COULD BE CON- <br /> VERTED TO A' GRAVITY fLOW, BUT PENDING THE C~NSTRUCTION Of SUCH GRAVITY fLOW LINE <br /> e A PUMP STATION MIGHT BE USED TO ALLOW THE AREA TO BE SERVED WITH A SEWER AT THIS <br /> TIME. IT WAS INDICATED THAT If THIS LATTER PROCEDURE WERE fOLLOWED, SOME FINAN- <br /> CIAL LOSS WOULD OCCUR BUT THAT SOME PORTION Of SUCH A PUMP STATION COULD BE SAL- . <br /> VAGED. IT WAS LIKEWISE INDICATED IT WAS UNLIKELY THAT FEDERAL'AI.D COULD BE RE- <br /> CEIVED fOR SUCH A SEWER LINE SINCE FEDERAL AID IS AVAILABLE fOR ONL~ INTERCEPTOR <br /> LINES OR PUMPING STATIONS AND IS NOT AVAILABLE fOR COLLECTION SYSTEMS~ THE COM- <br /> MITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PREPARE A STUDY Of THE POSSI- <br /> BILITIES Of I NSTALLI NG SAN,I TARY SEWERS IN THE WEST 11TH AVENUE AREA ON AN ASSESS- <br /> MENT BASIS. <br /> t . <br /> 6. DISCUSSION ON WAYS AND MEANS Of RAISING MONEY FOR A NEW CITY HALL - THE BUDGET COM- <br /> MITTE~ RECOMMENDATI'ON'REGARDING VARIOUS WAYS Of RAISING MONEY fOR A NEW CITY HALL. <br /> WAS BROUGHT BEFORE THE COMMITTEE. IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT THE CITY HAS THREE POSSI- <br /> BLE SOURCES Of INCOME, UNE BEING fROM THE REAL. PROPERTY TAX, ONE fROM A BUSINESS <br /> TAX AND A THIRD fROM AN INCOME TAX If STATUTORY PROVISION IS ENACTED ALLOWING <br /> I MUNICIPALITIES TO ENTER THIS FIELD. THE. POSSI BI LI TY: Of INCREASING THE WATER USERS <br /> CHARGE FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE CITY WAS ALSO DISCUSSED. OTHER THOUGHTS WERE PRE- <br /> SENTED TO THE, COMMI TTEE, AND IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT ~HE FINANCE COMMITTEE OF THE. <br /> COUNCIL STUDY THE SITUATION AND T~ POSSIBLE METHODS OF RAISING fUNDS fOR A NEW <br /> C I TV' HALL. . <br /> 7. DISCUSSION REGARDING POSSIBILITY OF USING PRESENT LIBRARY BUILDING F,OR EXPANSION <br /> OF CITY OfFICES WHEN THE NEW LIBRARY BUILDING IS COMPLETED - SOME DISCUSSION WAS <br /> HAD AS TO WHETHER IT WOULD BE POSSIBLE TO USE THE EXISTING LIBRARY BUILDING FOR <br /> e CITY OfFICES AND/OR COUNCIL CHAMBERS WHEN THE LIBRARY MOVES TO ITS NEW LOCATION. <br /> THE MATTER WAS REFERRED TO THE CITY ATTORNEY fOR HIS OPINION AS TO WHETHER SUCH <br /> USAGE WAS POSSIBLE. " <br /> ....1 <br />