10/14/1957 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.., 5 e 10/14/57 --~--- ----~--- ---.. ----~~~--_. -----------~_.- ------.---------------------------- .---- ----- - -~.- -- ---- -- ------ ----- ' . --~~_._-- _~~~~__~_n~_____ n~__~_ -_0--- - -- ---- --~- ---- - - -- -- - --- - - ---- ------- - -- --- r~ I PER CONSTRUCTION. 'To THE END THAT ANY MISUNDERSTANDING AND UNPLEASANTNESS MIGHT · I BE AVERTED, THE COMMISSIONERS REQUESTED A MEETING WITH THE COUNCIL AT AN EARLY DATE. I I AfTER SOME DISCUSSION IN WHICH IT WAS, SUGGESTED THAT TH~ COUNCIL MIGHT TAKE ACTION TO STAY THE INSTRUCTIONS TO ~HE CITY MANAGE~ REGARDING ENfORC~MENT Of THE BUILDING CODE, IT WAS RECOMM~NDED THAT THE CIT~ MANAGER DELAY ACTION AS INSTRUCTKDNBY THE , COMMON COUNC I L AT THE I R MEE'TI NG ON SEPTEMBER 23, 1957 WITH RESPECT TO THE ENfORCE- J I I MENT Of THE BUILDING CODE AND THAT SUCH ACTION BE STAYED UNTIL A MEETING COULD BE I I I HELD BETWEEN THE COUNCIL AND THE LANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. I I I 2. REQUEST BY CARTER OIL COMPANY fOR VARJANCES fOR SERVICE STATION TO BE LOCATED AT I I I THE NORTHWEST CORNER Of JEffERSON STREET AND ~TH AVENUE - A REQUEST fROM CARTER I I OIL COMPANY ASKING fOR A VARIANCE Of THE 40' SET BACK RESTRICTION TO ERECT fLOOD I I POLES AND fOR THE SET BACK AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE STREET fOR SIGN REQUIREMENTS AND fOR' PROPERTY LINE SET BACKS WAS PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE. THEIR REQUEST I I I I S TO (A) LOCATE fLOODLIGHT POLES AND IDENTlfICATIO~ SIGN AT PROPERTY LINES AT ! THE CORNERS Of THEIR PROPERTY ON WEST, 6TH AVENUE AND JEffERSON STREET, (B) TO USE e A STANDARD IDENTifiCATION SIGN HAVING AN AREA Of 29-1/2 SQUARE fEET WHERE THE I MAXIMUM SIGN UNDER THE ZONING IS 20 SQUARE fEET, AND (C) TO CONSTRUCT A CANOPY 6-1/2 fEET fROM THE fRONT YARD PROPER~Y LINE WHICH WOULD EXTEND INTO THE 40' SET BACK fROM THE CENTER Of JEffERSON STREET AND WEST 6TH AVENUE A DISTANCE Of 1/2 I fOOT. THE COMMITTEE GAVE SOME DISCUS~ION TO THE VAR$OUS REQUESTS Of CARTER OIL I COMPANY AND RECOMMENDED APPROVAL Of THE APPLICATION fOR VARIANCES AS INDICATED I ABOVE. I I I 3. REQUEST fROM MR. FRANK KINNEY, OREGON SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION, fOR QUITCLAIM DEED ,I TO EASEMENTS IN THE ORIGINAL PLAT Of SUNNy'HOLLOW - MR. FRANK KINNEY HAS REQUESTED I THAT CERTA I N EASEMENTS ALONG THE S I DEi LOT LINES Of LOTS 10 AND I I, LOTS 18 AND 19, I AND LOTS 20 AND 21 IN BLOCK 5 Of THE ORIGINAL PLAT Of SUNNY HOLLOW BE QUITCLAIMED ! I TO HIM SINCE IT APPEARS THAT THE PLAT~ A$ ORIGINALLY fiLED ERRONEOUSLY CONTAINED EASEMENTS fOR UTILITY PURPOSES ALONG THE SIDE LOT LINES, AND AS NEARLY AS CAN BE i DETERMINED THESE EASEMENTS HAVE NO VALuE AS THE AREA NOW STANDS. IT WAS EX- i I PLAINED THAT THE AREA HAD BEEN PROVIDED WITH A SEWER LINE AND THAT SUCH SEWER 1 I LINE WAS NOT CONSTRUCTED ON THE SIDE LOT EASEMENTS .BUT WAS CONSTRUCTED ON A 'I I SEPARATE EASEMENT 'ALONG THE 'REAR Of THE PROPERT I ES. THE COMMITTEE DISCUSSEiD THIS, I 1 VIEWED A MAP ON WHICH THE EASEMENTS AND CURRENT SEWER LINES WERE SHOWN, AND RE- I I COMMENDED THAT THE PROPER CITY OFFICIALS BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY I I ,I QUITCLAIM DEED FOR THE EASEMENT AREASi ALONG LOTS 10, I I, 18, 19,20 AND 21" I BLOCK 5, SUNNY HOLLOW ADDITION. I I I I AIRPORT COMMITTEE I I I. REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ON CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE MADE BY OLSON ELECTRIC I I I COMPANY ON AIRPORT HIGH INTENSITY LIGHTING CONTRACT - A REQUEST BY OLSON ELECTRIC I 1 I ,COMPANY FOR AN EXTENSION TO OCTOBER 30, 1957 ON THE HIGH INTENSITY LIGHTING SYSTEM I 1 CONTRACT AT MAHLON-SWEET AIRPORT WAS PRESENTED TOTHE COMMITTEE AND DISCUSSED BY THE COMMITTEE. IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT THE FIRM HAD NOT YET RECEIVED ONE 25 KVA I il ISOLATING ~RANSFORMER, WAS EXPECTING pEL IVERY ON OCTOBER 18, 1957, AND WOULD COM- I i PLETE THE JOB AS RAPIDLY AS POSSIBLE JHEREAFTER. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THE I I I I I REQUEST BE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE. I " I 2 I COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE j I. DISCUSSION REGARDING PROPOSED ORDINANCE ON THE FENCING OF SWIMMING POOLS, ETC. - I I I ,! THE'PROPOSED ORDINANCE WHICH WOULD REQUIRE THE FENCING OF SWIMMING POOLS AND THE I , I FENCING OR SCREENING OF. FISH PONDS, EXCAVATIONS, CESSPOOLS, WELLS, ETC., WAS AGAIN I DISCUSSED BY THE COMMITTEE.,' INCLUDED IN THE DISCUSSION WAS THE SUBJECT OF, THE, I " POSSIBLE' INCLUSION OF REQUIRING FENCING Of THE MILLRACE, ALTHOUGH IT WAS NOT fELT .' l !e THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE SHOULD INCLUDE A REQUIREMENT FOR MILLRACE FENCING. I I I I WITH RESPECT TO THE ORDINANCE UNDER STUDY REGARDING SWIMMING POOLS, EXCAVATIONS, I I I 1 FISH PONDS, ETC., IT WAS SUGGESTED,TH'AT THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE SHOULD NOT APPLY I AND THAT ADEQUATE TIME SHOULD BE GIVEN FOR THE FENCING Of SUCH AREAS. SOME REPRE- I I SENTATIVES Of THE COMMITTEE " I INDICATED THEY BELIEVED"THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO BE TOO EXTREME SINCE IT APPEARED TO BE A MATTER Of OVER REGULATtON Of INDIVIDUALS AND " I THEIR RIGHTS. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE ORDINANCE AS PROPOSED BE ADOPTED i I WITH THE EXCEPTION Of THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE AND THAT A SECTION BE SUBSTJTUTED fOR THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH THE ORDINANCE SIX MONTHS AfTER DATE I Of PASSAGE Of THE ORDINANCE.~ i I I IT WAS MOVED BY MR. WATSON SECONDED BY MR. SHEARER THAT THE REPORT OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE I BE ADOPTED. MOTION CARRIED.' I I I IT WAS MOVED BY MR.' SHISLER SECONDED BvMR. WATSON THAT THE REPORT Of THE AIRPORT COMMITTEE BE RE- I I I CEIVED AND PLACED ON fiLE. MOTION CARRIED. ! I ! I I IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. EDMUNDS THAT THE REPORT Of THE COMMITTEE Of THE WHOLE I I I BE APPROVED. MOTION DEfEATED. I I I I I - , e i I j Ii ! , ~ I: