Laserfiche WebLink
<br />".... 9 6 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />2/10/58 <br /> <br />,- --- _.._----~~-- -- ---- - -- ---- ~ -- ---- ------- -----~--.-- --- ---- --- ---- <br />- -- . - . - - -- -- --- .- <br /> <br />-~- ------ -- _.---------- <br />- - -_. - -- <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />ENGINEERS WITH RESPECT TO THE POSSIBILITY OF EXTENDING THE AMAZON CHANNEL <br />SOUTHERLY A DISTANCE OF APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WHICH WOULD CARRY THE CHANNEL <br />TO 24TH AVENUE IN AN ATTEMPT TO DETERMINE WHAT ADDITIONAL COSTS WOULD BE IN- <br />VOLVED IF SUCH EXTENSION WERE ACCOMPLISHED. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />By LETTER IT WAS INDICATED THAT THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS ESTIMATE THE ADDI- <br />TIONAL COST TO THE CITY OF EUGENE AFTER CERTAIN CREDITS WOULD BE $32,600. <br />THE CRED I TS WOULD BE OCCAS 10NED SINCE, THE CORPS OF ENG I NEERS WOULD NOT BE RE- <br />QUIRED TO CONSTRUCT A TRANSITION STRUCTURE AT THE 24TH AVENUE, BRJDGE, NOR <br />WINGWALLS AND CHANNEL PAVEMENT AT THE UPSTREAM END OF THE AUTHORIZED RECTANGULAR <br />CONCRETE CHANNEL. IT WAS FURTHER INDICATED THAT THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS HAS RE- <br />QUESTED THEY BE NOT,IFIED BY FEBRUARY 15, 1958 AS TO WHAT ACTION THE CITY WISHES <br />TO TAKE SO THAT THE WHOLE OF'THE PROJECT WOULD NOT BE HELD UP. No ACTION ON <br />THIS MATTER WAS REQUESTED AND NONE WAS TAKEN. <br /> <br />4. CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION TO THE COUNCIL, CONCERNING <br />URBAN RENEWAL STUDY - THE CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION WAS ASKED TO OPEN <br />THE 0 I SCUSS ION REGARD I NG A PROPOSED' URBAN RENEWAL ST,UDY PROGRAM FOR THE CITY. <br />IN HIS PRELIMINARY REMARKS HE INDICATED THERE'ARE A NUMBER Of POSSIBLE URBAN <br />RENEWAL PROJECTS IN THE CITY BUT THAT ONE SUCH AREA LOCATED GENERALLY EAST Of <br />THE PRESENT COURTHOU~E ,SITE AT 8TH AVENUE AND OAK STREET JS, IN THE OPINION <br />OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, PARTICULARLY SITUATED fOR A STUDY AND A POSSIBLE <br />URBAN RENEWAL PROGRAM. HE I NO I CATED THAT SUCH A PROGRAM WOULD CONTA,I N A NUM- <br />BER OF FACETS INCLUDING THE TRAFFIC PROBLEM AND THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC IN AND <br />AROUND THIS AREA, OfF-STREET PARKING, GENERAL AREA REJUVENATION, AS WELL AS <br />THE POSSI~ILITY FOR POTENTIAL PUBLIC BUILDINGS FOR ANUMBER Of AGENCIES. IT <br />WAS INDICATED THAT THE PLANNING,COMM'ISSI6N FEELS THAT AN UR~A~ RENEWAL PR6GRAM <br />COULD WELL BE USED AS A TOOL FOR PROPER PLANNING OF THE AREA AND THA! BY, ITS <br />USAGE THE fACILITIES OF THE fEDERAL GOVERNMENT ~RE MADE AVAILABLE TO URBAN <br />COMMUNITIES NOT ONLY IN EUGENE BUT ELSEWHERE. CERTAIN PRELIMINARY COST ESTI- <br />MATES AND ANTICIPATED RETURNS WERE EXPLAINED TO THE COMMITTEE WITH THE UNDER- <br />STANDING THAT THEY ARE ONLY ESTIMATES BASED ON SUCH KNOWN FACTS AS ARE AVAIL- <br />ABLE AND ON, VERBAL CONVERSATIONS WITH OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGE~CIES. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />THERE WAS A GREAT AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION IN THE COMMITTEE AND SOME INTERESTED <br />CITIZENS AND ORGANIZATION~ WITH RESPECT TO THE URGAN RENEWAL PROGRAM AN~ ITS <br />STUDY, AND I.T WAS RE-EMPHASIZED THAT AT ,THIS TIM,E THE CPMMITTEE IS CONSIDER- <br />ING ONLY THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR AN URBAN RENEWAL <br />STUDY AND THAT IT IS NOT COMMITTING ITSELF TO A COMPLETE URBAN RENEWAL PROGRAM. <br />IN THE DISCUSSION THERE WAS NO COMPLETE UNANIMITY OF OPINION AND A NUMBER OF <br />THOUGHTS CONCERNING THE PROGRAM WERE ADVANCED. <br /> <br />IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RECOMMEND fAVORABLE ACTION <br />ON THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR AN URBAN RENEWAL STUDY <br />PROGRAM. MOTION CARRIED WITH COUNCILMAN LINDEEN VOTING NAY.", <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED B't: MR. SHISLER SECONDED BY MR. EDMUNDS THAT THE REPORT o.F THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE <br />BE REFERRED BACK TO THE PUBLIC Wo.RKS ,COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED, BY MR. EDMUNDS SECON,DED BY MR. SHEARER THAT' ITEM 4 o.F THE REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE <br />OF THE WHOLE CONCERNING ,URBAN RENEWAL, PROGRAM STUDY BE PLACED LAST ON THE AGENDA. MOTION DEFEATED. <br /> <br />ITEMS I AND 2 OF THE REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE o.F THE WHOLE DID NOT REQUIRE COUNCIL ACTION. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. HARTMAN WITH RESPECT TO ITEM 3 o.F THE REPORT OF THE <br />COMMITTEE Of THE WHOLE Co.NCERNING EXTENSION OF AMAZON CHANNEL THAT THE CITY MANAGER BE, AUTHo.RIZED TO <br />NEGo.TIATE WITH THE CORPS o.F ENGINEERS FOR THE EXTENSION OF THE AMAZON CHANNEL 'A DiSTANCE OF APPROXI- <br />MATELY 700 FEET TO BRING THE LiNED CHANNEL TO 24TH AVENGE AT AN ESTIMATED COST O~ $3~,600. ROL~CALL <br />VOTE. ALL COUNCILMEN PRESENT VOTING AYE, MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR~ HARTMAN SECONDED BY MR. SHEARER THAT ITEM 4 OF THE REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE <br />OF THE WHOLE CQ.NCERNING URBAN RENEWAL PROGRAM STUDY BE ADOPTED. ROLLCALL VOTE. Mo.TION CARRIED, <br />WITH MR. EDMUNDS ABSTAINING AND MR. LINDEEN VOTING NAY. <br /> <br />REPORTS Of BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS <br /> <br />A PERMANENT REPORT Of THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 4, 1958 - RE: REZONING <br />REQUEST MRS. THEODORE STERN, POLK STREET; AMENDMENT TO ORD I NANCE #10941 J TRA ILER Ho.USE:Sj AND REQUEST <br />FOR ANNEXATION PAPE' AND FISCHER, WEST,'OF LAUREL HILL CEMETERYj WAS SUBMITTED'AN.D'~EAD AS fOLLOWS: <br /> <br />"As A PERMANENT REPORT, PURSUANT TO. THE RESo.LUTION OF THE COMMON C,OUNCIL <br />OF THt CITY o.F EUGENE, DIRECTING THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION TO HOLD A HEAR- <br />ING AND PREPARE A'REPORT UPON THE FOLLOWING REQUESTS FO.R REZONING, THE,' PLANNING, <br />COMMISSION HEREBY ADOPTS AS ITS PERMANENT REPORT THE FOLLOWING: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT THE FOLLOWING REQUEST FOR REZONING <br />WHICH WAS APPROVED AT THE JANUARY 7, 1958 MEETING, AND WHICH WAS REFERRED BACK <br />TO. THE PLANNING COMMISSION BY THE COUNCIL, BE TABLED UNTIL APRIL 1ST MEETING fOR <br />FURTHER STUDY: <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~J <br />