|
<br />r-- 206
<br />
<br />6/9/58
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />_______~____________4._____
<br />- - - . - - - - - - . - . -..,. --- - .-
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />,
<br />11
<br />'I
<br />j
<br />I
<br />j
<br />i
<br />i
<br />~
<br />!
<br />
<br />f
<br />
<br />I
<br />j
<br />1
<br />,
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />!
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />j
<br />I
<br />j
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />,
<br />I
<br />I !
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />!
<br />
<br />i
<br />I
<br />1
<br />i
<br />1
<br />,i
<br />,
<br />I
<br />I
<br />\
<br />
<br />t
<br />Ii
<br />~j
<br />
<br />HE FURTHER POINTED OUT THAT HIS ESTIMATES INCLUDED ONLY CON..ST,RUCTION COSTS AND NOT
<br />THAT OF ACQUIRING R,IGHTS-OF-W~Y. MR. FISCHER POINTED OUT THAT HIS ORGANIZATIO'N IN-
<br />TENDS TO CONSTRUCT SEVERAL HUNDRED FEET OF RAILROAD SPUR LINES WHICH WOULD INCREASE
<br />THE COST OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE SEWER IF DONE AT A LATER DATE AND STATED THAT HE
<br />WOULD APPRECIATE AN INDIC~TION OF THE COUNCIL'S fEELING REGARDING ,THE :CO~STRUCTION
<br />OF A SEWER LINE FOLLOWING ONE OF THE ABOVE ALTERNATES AS HIS ORGANIZAT,ION IS VERY
<br />ANXIOUS TO HAVE THE LINE CONSTRUCTED. HE LIKEWISE INDICATED THAT THEY WERE WILLING
<br />TO DEFRAY THE ENTIRE COST OF THE SEWER LINE CONSTRUCTION WITH THE CITY TO R,EPAY ITS
<br />S~ARE OF THE c6~r BX'WAY QF ASHO~f'T~R~ (ciAN.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />SOMEMEM~ERS OF THE; COMMITTEE INDICATED THAT ALTHOU,GH :THEY FAVOR A. STUD'( OF THE
<br />MATTER OF CONSTRUCtiNG A SEWER LINE TO SER~E THI.S AREA, THEY QUESTIONED WHETHER
<br />THI.S ,MORE RECENTLY ANNEXED AREA SHOULD BE B~I'!EfITED WITH SEWER SERVICE BEFORE SEWER
<br />SERVICE .IS P~OVIDED TO ~REASWHICH HAD BEEN ANNEXED TO THE CITY. ~OR ~OME T~ME.
<br />
<br />11
<br />I
<br />I
<br />J
<br />
<br />THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT
<br />AND THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
<br />OF ,RIGHTS-,O~~WA~ AND, ACCESS.
<br />
<br />A STUDY OF ALTERNAT~ #1 BE MADE AND THAT MR: FISCHER
<br />UNDERTAKE A FURTHER STUDY REGARDING THE ACQUISITION
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I . - - . - .
<br />2. DISCUSSION REGARDING PAYMENT OF BilL PRESENTED BY GODLOVE THE PLUMBER,-.TH~ COM-,
<br />MITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THIS IT~MBEHELD IN COMMtTTEE FO~,FURTHER DISCUS~ION~
<br />
<br />3. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER .#1, NEW LIBRARY BUILDING - MR. R.~BERT Le;MON,
<br />CHAIRMAN.~F THE LIBRARY BQARD, SUBMITTED TO T~E COMMitTEE CHANGE ORDER #1 ~HtCH
<br />AUTHORIZED THE CONTRACTOR ,TQ' EXCAVA1:E AN ADqlTIONAL, 1447 !'(,ARDS OF UNSTABLE ~ILT
<br />UNDERLYING THE BASEMENT FLOOR OF THE NEW LIBRARY BUIDDING AND,TO REPLACE THE SILT
<br />WITH BAR RUN GRAVEL AS SPECI,FIED BY THE ARCHI.TECTS. THIS .ADDITIONAL ,WOR~ WOLJLD
<br />INCREASE TH~ TOTAL CONTRA~T ~Y~4341 BASED.ON UNIT PRICES SUBMITTED BY T~E. CON- -:
<br />TRACTOR. THIS AMOUNT IS I~ EXCESS Of THE $2500 WHICH H~D BEEN AUTHORIZED FOR CHANGE
<br />ORDERS. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT CHANGE ORDER #1 AS OUTLINED ABOVE BE ~PPROVED.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />4. REPORT OF RECOMME~DATION,FOR SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT BY CORNELL,How~ND, HAYES, &Y2
<br />MERRYFIELD - MR. RALPH RODERICK, CONSULTING ENGINEER FOR CO~~ELL, HOWLAND, HAYE~ &
<br />MERRYFI~LD, PRESENTED EACH COMMITTEE MEMBER WITH A COpy OF THE PROPOSED ADDITIONS
<br />TO THE PRESENT ~EWAGE TREAT~ENT P~~NT. !N ORDER TO qETE~MINE THAT THE PROPOSED
<br />CHANGES WILL COMPLETE THE PLANT AS REQUIRED BY T~E OREGON STATE ,SANITARY ~UTHORITY,
<br />HE RECOMMENDED THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PILOT PLANT DURING THE SUMMER OF 1958 AT AN
<br />ESTIMATED COST OF $150Q. ,THfS COST MAY BE REDUCED !F FILTER ROCK CAN BE:~~QUIRED
<br />AND PRock~~t6'LOCA(~~AS~HIS tSTIMAlE IS BASED ON.THE SOURCE.OF SUPPLY Of,IHI.S~OCK
<br />BEING ROSEBURG.
<br />
<br />MR. RODE~ICK ESTIMATES TijE OPERATIONAL' COST OF THE; P~LOT PLANT AT 13500 WH,!C~ WOULD
<br />INCLUDE,PAYI~G A SANlTARyENGINe;ER OB ,CHEMIST TO CONDUCT TESTS THR~~GHOUT THE SUM-
<br />MER. HE' PO I NTED OUT --THAT"I -j-' '15- FEA$'I EiL,(' THAT THE FEDERAL GOVe;'~NMENT C~N PART lei PATE
<br />TO A MAXIMUM OF 30% OF ,THE OPERATIOr;l~L .COST BUT CANNOT PARTICIPATE IN THE CONSTRUC-
<br />TION COST.
<br />
<br />THE COMM I TT.EE REC.OMMENDED TH~T THE CITY MANAGE.R BE AUTHOR I ZED TO SPEND A MAX IMUMOF
<br />$5000 FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE:PILOT PLANT,WITH FUNDS TO BE USED FROM
<br />THE SEWAGE DISPOSAL FUND.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />5. DISCUSSION OF BIDS ON VARIOUS IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS OPENED JUNE 5, 1958 - THE TABULA-
<br />TION OF BIDS AS OPENED JUNE 5, 1958 FOR VARIOUS IMPROVEMENT P~OJECTS WAS ,REFERRED TO
<br />THE COUNCIL WITHOUT DISCUSSION OR RECOMMENDATION.
<br />
<br />6. DISCUSSION OF L,EASE TERMS FOR JET. fUEL STORAGE AT: MAHLON-$WEET,A'I RPORt' i,.lITH WEST --'
<br />COAST AIRLJNES - THE CITY RECORPER PRESENTED A CONTRA~T wi.flCH WEST COA"?T'A"I'RL'IN~S'
<br />HAS MADE,WITH THE.CITY OF LEWISTON, IPAijO"TO THE ~9MMITT~E. ,THE CIT! E~GINEER.
<br />POINTED OUT. THAT IT IS. NECESSARY TO RECEIVE THE APPROYAL QF THE C!VIL AERONAUTICS
<br />ADMINISTRATIO~OF,ANY CONTRACT CONCER~ING.JET FUELS. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ,THAT
<br />THE CITY OF EUGENE CONTRACT A TE~ YEARLEA?E,AGREEMENT WITH WEST> COAST AIRLINE~ AT
<br />2; PER SQUARE FOOT Of A8EA USED WITH OPTION AND C~NCELLATION~TIFICATION C~AUSES IN-
<br />CLUDEDAND BASICALLY SIMILAR TO THE ~EWISTON" JpAHO CONT~ACT, SUBJECT, TO CAA APPROVAL.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
<br />I. PROPERTY ACQUISITION WEST SIDE Of HILYARD STREET FROM 25TH TO 29TH AVENUE - THE PARKS
<br />& RECREATION,DEPARTMENT DESIReD TO,HAVE SlpEWALKS PLACED 9N THE WE~T SIDE OF H~LYARD
<br />STREET FROM 25TH TO 29TH AVENUE TO MAK~ IT EASIER TO plRECT PEOPLE TO THE,PARK AND
<br />SWIMMING POOL AREA AND FOR THE SAFETY OF CHILDRE~ GOI~G,TO AND: FROM THE PARK AREA.
<br />THE CITY RECORDER INplCATED,THAT DIFFICULTY HAD,BEENENCOUNTERED IN NEGOTIAT~NG FOR
<br />RIGHTS-OF-WAY WITH PROPERTY 9WNERS,AT 25TH AVENUE. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMEND~D THAT
<br />THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY. BE ACQUIRED AND THE SIDEWALK ,INSTALLED AT. A COST EQUAL, TO THE
<br />ASSESSMENT FOR THE SIDEWALK,=AND THAT THE SIDE~ALKBEA?SESSED BACK TO THE OWNE~S
<br />OF ABUTTING PROPERTY.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />. . . .
<br />2. VARIANCE FROM FRONT PROPERTY LINE SETBACK REQUESTED BY G. W. MILLETT, 320,SUNSET
<br />DRIVE - THE COMMITTEE VIEWED THE SITE OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE AT 320 SUNSET DRIVE
<br />AND IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT THE REQUESTED ~ETBACK IS IN LINE WITH ADJOIN.ING P~O~
<br />PERTIES.. THE COMMITTEE:,RECOMMENDED THE VARIANCE BE GRANTED) UPHOLDING THE ACTION
<br />
<br />OF THE BOARD OF ApPEALS.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
|